Bolete diversity in two relict forests of the Mexican beech (Fagus grandifolia var. Mexican; Fagaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 893-898

  Rodríguez Ramírez, Ernesto Ch ^a   Moreno, Claudia E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE HIDALGO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Beta diversity; Boletaceae; Community ecology; Conservation; Fagaceae; Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana; Hidalgo; Mexico; Montane cloud forest; Species richness

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECTOMYCORRHIZA; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FUNGUS; MONTANE FOREST; RELICT COMMUNITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES RICHNESS;

HIDALGO; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

BOLETACEAE; FAGACEAE; FAGUS; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA VAR. MEXICANA; FUNGI;

EID: 77952329472     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900284     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baselga, A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 134-143.
2. Baselga, A., A. Jiménez-Valverde, and G. Niccolini. 2007. A multiple-site similarity measure independent of richness. Biology Letters 3: 642-645.
3. Chao, A., R. L. Chazdon, R. K. Colwell, and T.-J. Shen. 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecology Letters 8: 148-159.
4. Clarke, K. R., and R. N. Gorley. 2001. PRIMER v5: User manual/ tutorial. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
5. Clarke, K. R., and M. Warwick. 1994. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
6. Colwell, R. K. 2006. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 8.0. Website http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates. University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
7. Colwell, R. K., and J. A. Coddington. 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 345: 101-118.
8. Estrada-Martínez, E., G. Guzmán, D. Cibrián, and R. Ortega. 2009. Contribución al conocimiento etnomicológico de los hongos comestibles silvestres de mercados regionales y comunidades de la Sierra Nevada (México). Interciencia 34: 25-33.
9. Fang, J., and M. J. Lechowicz. 2006. Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1804-1819.
10. García-Jiménez, J., and F. Garza-Ocañas. 2001. Conocimiento de los hongos de la familia Boletaceae de M é xico. Ciencia UANL 4: 336-343.
11. Gehring, C. A., T. C. Theimer, T. G. Whitham, and P. Keim. 1998. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure of pinyon pines growing in two environmental extremes. Ecology 79: 1562-1572.
12. Halling, R. E., T. W. Osmundson, and M.-A. Neves. 2008. Pacific boletes: Implications for biogeographic relationships. Mycological Research 112: 437-447.
13. Henderson, P. A., and R. M. H. Seaby. 2002. Species diversity and richness III, version 3.0.2. Pisces Conservation, Lymington, Hampshire, UK.
14. Ishida, T. A., K. Nara, and T. Hogetsu. 2007. Host effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities: Insight from eight host species in mixed conifer-broadleaf forests. New Phytologist 174: 430-440.
15. Mueller, G. M., J. P. Schmit, S. M. Huhndorf, L. Ryvarden, T. E. O'Dell, D. J. Lodge, P. R. Leacock, et al. 2004. Recommended protocols for sampling macrofungi. In G. M. Mueller, G. F. Bills, and M. S. Foster [eds.], Biodiversity of fungi: Inventory and monitoring methods, 168-171. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
16. Newton, A. C., and J. M. Haigh. 1998. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Britain: A test of the species - area relation, and the role of host specificity. New Phytologist 138: 619-627.
17. Ortiz-Santana, B., D. J. Lodge, T. J. Baroni, and E. E. Both. 2007. Boletes from Belize and the Dominican Republic. Fungal Diversity 27: 247-416.
18. Osono, T., and H. Takeda. 2006. Fungal decomposition of Abies needle and Betula leaf litter. Mycologia 98: 172-179.
19. Peay, K. G., T. D. Bruns, P. G. Kennedy, S. E. Bergemann, and M. Garbelotto. 2007. A strong species-area relationship for eukaryotic soil microbes: Island size matters for ectomycorrhizal fungi. Ecology Letters 10: 470-480.
20. Pérez, P. M. 1999. Las hayas de México: Monografía de Fagus grandifolia spp. mexicana. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Chapingo, México.
21. Rodríguez-Ramírez, E. Ch. 2007. Taxonomía de la familia Boletaceae, en los bosques templados de Zacualtip á n, Hidalgo, México. B.Sc. thesis, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Hidalgo, Mexico.
22. Rodríguez-Ramírez, E. Ch. 2009. Diversidad de la familia Boletaceae en dos bosques de Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana en el estado de Hidalgo, México. M.Sc. thesis, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Hidalgo, Mexico.
23. Rzedowski, J. 1993. Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In T. P. Ramamoorthy, R. Bye, A. Lot, and J. Fa [eds.], Biological diversity of Mexico: Origins and distribution, 129-144. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. Smith, M. E., and D. H. Pfister. 2009. Tuberculate ectomycorrhizae of angiosperms: The interaction between Boletus rubropunctus (Boletaceae) and Quercus species (Fagaceae) in the United States and Mexico. American Journal of Botany 96: 1665-1675.
25. Téllez-Valdés, O., P. Dávila-Aranda, and R. Lira-Saade. 2006. The effects of climate change on the long-term conservation of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana, an important species of the cloud forest in eastern Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 1095-1107.
26. Thomas, B. 2003. Boletus manicus Heim. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 35: 393-394.
27. Unterseher, M., P. Otto, and W. Morawetz. 2005. Species richness and substrate specificity of lignicolous fungi in the canopy of a template, mixed deciduous forest. Mycological Progress 4: 117-132.
28. Velázquez, A. J., F. Mas, and J. L. Palacio. 2002. Análisis del cambio de uso del suelo. Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAT, México, D.F., Mexico.
29. Williams-Linera, G., M. Duvell, and C. Alvarez-Aquino. 2000. A relict population of Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana at the Acatlan Volcano, Mexico: Structure, phenology, litterfall and dendroecology. Journal of Biogeography 27: 1297-1309.
30. Williams-Linera, G., A. Rowden, and A. C. Newton. 2003. Distribution and stand characteristics of relict populations of Mexican beech (Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana). Biological Conservation 109: 27-36.