Standardizing and categorizing tree growth models

Sustainable Forest Management: Growth Models for Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 39-57

  Pretzsch, Hans ⁱ   Biber, Peter ^a   Dursky, Jan ^b   Von Gadow, Klaus ^c   Hasenauer, Hubert ^d   Kändler, Gerald ^e   Kenk, Georg ^e   Kublin, Edgar ^e   Nagel, Jürgen ^f   Pukkala, Timo ^g   Skovsgaard, Jens Peter ^h   Sodtke, Rainer ^a   Sterba, Hubert ^d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^e Forest Research Station Baden Württemberg   (Germany)

^f Forest Research Station Niedersachsen   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^h DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

ⁱ NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952320941     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31304-4_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Arney JD (1972) Computer simulation of Douglas-fir tree and stand growth. PhD Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, 79 pp
2. Assmann E (1953) Bestockungsdichte und Holzerzeugung. Forstwiss Centralbl 72(3/4):69-101
3. Assmann E (1956) Natürlicher Bestockungsgrad und Zuwachs. Forstwiss Centralbl 75:257-265
4. Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 507 pp
5. Assmann E, Franz F (1965) Vorläufige Fichten-Ertragstafel für Bayern. Forstwiss Centralbl 84(1):13-43
6. Bella IE (1971) A new competition model for individual trees. For Sci 17(3):364-372
7. Biber P (1996) Konstruktion eines einzelbaumorientierten Wachstumssimulators für Fichten-Buchen-Mischbestände im Solling. Ber Forschungsz Waldökosyst 142(A):252 pp
8. Brockhaus (1994) Die Enzyklopädie in 24 Bänden, 20th edn. Brockhaus, Leipzig
9. Brockhaus (1997) Die Enzyklopädie in 24 Bänden, 20th edn. Brockhaus, Leipzig
10. Burkhart HE, Farrar KD, Amateis RL, Daniels RF (1987) Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in loblolly pine plantations on cutover, site-prepared areas. Publ FWS-1-87. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 47 pp
11. Clutter JL, Bennett FA (1965) Diameter distributions in old-field slash pine plantations. Rep 13. Georgia Forestry Research Council, Atlanta, 9 pp
12. Daniels RF, Burkhart HE (1975) Simulation of individual tree growth and stand development in managed loblolly pine plantations. Publ FWS-5-75. Division of Forestry and Wildlife Research, Vancouver Polytechnic Institute and State University, Vancouver Polytechnic Institute and State University, Vancouver, 69 pp
13. Eckmüllner O, Fleck W (1989) Begleitdokumentation zum Wachstumssimulationsprogramm WASIM Version 1.0. Institut für Forstliche Ertragslehre, Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, 30 pp
14. Ek AR, Monserud RA (1974) Trials with program FOREST: growth and reproduction simulation for mixed species even- or uneven-aged forest stands. In: Fries J (ed) Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Res Notes 30. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, pp 56-73
15. Hasenauer H (1994) Ein Einzelbaumwachstumssimulator für ungleichaltrige Kiefern- und Buchen-Fichtenmischbestände. Forstliche Schriftenreihe Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, 152 pp
16. Hundeshagen JC (1837) Encyclopädie der Forstwissenschaft, 3rd edn. Laupp, Tübingen, 368 pp
17. Kahn M, Pretzsch H (1997) Das Wuchsmodell SILVA 2.1 - Parametrisierung für Rein- und Mischbestände aus Fichte und Buche. Allg Forst Jagdz 168(6/7):115-123
18. Kolström T (1993) Modelling the development of uneven aged stand of Picea abies. Scand J For Res 8:373-383
19. Lee Y (1967) Stand models for lodgepole pine and limits to their application. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 333 pp
20. Lin JY (1970) Growing space index and stand simulation of young western hemlock in Oregon. PhD Thesis. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 182 pp
21. Loiskekoski M, Halko L (ed) (2000) European list of criteria and most suitable quantitative indicators. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 16-17 June 1993, Helsinki. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland, http://www.mmm.fi/english/forestry/policy/minkonf/criteria. htm, accessed 28 Nov. 2000
22. Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:21-32
23. Ministerial Conference (1993) Resolution HI: general guidelines for the sustainable management of forests in Europe. Proc 2nd Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Helsinki, 5 pp
24. Mitchell KJ (1969) Simulation of the growth of even-aged stands of white spruce. Bull 75. School of Forestry, Yale University, 48 pp
25. Mitchell KJ (1975) Dynamics and simulated yield of Douglas-fir. For Sci Monogr 17:39 pp
26. Monserud RA (1975) Methodology for simulating Wisconsin northern hardwood stand dynamics. Univ Wis Diss Abstr 36(11):156 pp
27. Monserud RA, Sterba H (1996) A basal area increment model for even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For Ecol Manage 80:57-80
28. Munro DD (1974) Forest growth models - a prognosis. In: Fries J (ed) Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Res Notes 30. Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, dpp 7-21
29. Nagel J (1996) Anwendungsprogramm zur Bestandesbewertung und zur Prognose der Bestandesentwicklung. Forst Holz 51(3):76-78
30. Nagel J (1997) BWIN - Program for standard analysis and prognosis. User's manual for version 3.0. Niedersächsische Forstliche Versuchsanstalt, Göttingen
31. Nagel J (1999) Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zum schrittweisen Aufbau eines waldwachstumskundlichen Simulationssystems für Norddeutschland. Publ 128. Schriften aus der Forstliche Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsische Forstlliche Versuchanstalt, Sauerländer, Frankfurt/Main, 122 pp
32. Newnham RM (1964) The development of a stand model for Douglas-fir. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 201 pp
33. Popper KR (1984) Logik der Forschung. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 477 pp
34. Pretzsch H (1997) Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech - larch stands in Lower Saxony. For Ecol Manage 97:237-253
35. Pretzsch H (2001) Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Blackwell, Berlin, 341 pp
36. Pretzsch H, Dursky J (2001) Evaluierung von Waldwachstumssimulatoren auf Baum- und Bestandesebene. Allg Forst Jagdz 172(8/9):146-150
37. Pretzsch H, Kahn M (1995) Modelling growth of Bavarian mixed stands in a changing environment. Caring forthe forest: research in a changing world. Proc 20th IUFRO World Congress, 6-12 Aug, Tampere, Finland, pp 234-248
38. Pretzsch H, Biber P, Dursky J (2002a) The singletree based stand simulator SILVA. Construction, application and evaluation. For Ecol Manage 162:3-21
39. Pretzsch H, Biber P, Dursky J, Von Gadow K, Hasenauer H, Kändler G, Kenk G, Kublin E, Nagel J, Pukkala T, Skovsgaard JP, Sodtke R, Sterba H (2002b) Recommendations for standardized documentation and further development of forest growth simulators. Forstwiss Centralbl 121:138-151
40. Pukkala T (1987) Simulation model for natural regeneration of Pinus sylvestris. Picea abies, Betula pendula and Betula pubescens. Silva Fenn 21:37-53
41. Pukkala T, Miina J (1997) A method for stochastic multiobjective optimization of stand management. For Ecol Manage 98:189-203
42. Reineke LH (1933) Perfecting a stand-density index for even-aged forests. J Agric Res 46(7):627-638
43. Reynolds M, Burkhart H, Daniels R (1981) Procedures for statistical validation of stochastic simulation models. For Sci 27(2):349-364
44. Schwappach A (1889) Wachsthum und Ertrag normaler Kiefernbestände in der norddeutschen Tiefebene. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 72 pp
45. Schwappach A (1890) Wachstum und Ertrag normaler Fichtenbestände. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 100 pp
46. Sloboda B (1977) Kolmogorow-Suzuki und die stochastische Differentialgleichung als Beschreibungsmittel der Bestandesevolution. Proc IUFRO Congr Beiträge zur Zuwachsforschung, part 3, Mitt Forstl Bundes-Versuchsanst Wien 120:71-82
47. Suzuki T (1971) Forest transition as a stochastic process. Proc IUFRO Congr Beiträge zur Zuwachsforschung. Mitt Forstl Bundes-Versuchsanst Wien 91:69-86
48. Sterba H, Monserud R (1996) Validation of the single tree stand growth simulator PROGNAUS with permanent plot data. Proc IUFRO 20th World Congress, 6-12 Aug. 1995, Tampere, Finland, pp 36-49
49. Sterba H, Moser M, Monserud R (1995) Prognaus - ein Waldwachstumssimulator für Rein- und Mischbestände. Österreich Forstztg 5:19-20
50. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, 114 pp
51. Vanclay JK, Skovsgaard JP (1997) Evaluation for growth models. Ecol Model 98:1-12
52. Van Deusen PC, Biging GS (1985) STAG: a stand generator for mixed species stands, version 2.0. Res Note 11. Northern California Forest Yield Cooperative, Department of Forestry Research and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 25 pp
53. Von Gadow K (1987) Untersuchungen zur Konstruktion von Wuchsmodellen für schnellwüchsige Plantagenbaumarten. Forstl Forschungsberichte München 77:147 pp
54. Von Guttenberg A (1915) Wachstum und Ertrag der Fichte im Hochgebirge. Verlag Deuticke, Wien, Leipzig, 153 pp
55. Wensel LC, Daugerthy PJ (1984) CACTOS user's guide: the California conifer timber output simulator. Res Note 10. Northern California Forest Yield Cooperative, Department of Forestry Research and Management, University of California, Berkeley, 91 pp
56. Wensel LC, Koehler JR (1985) A tree growth projection system for Northern California coniferous forests. Res Note 12. Northern California Forest Yield Cooperative, Department of Forestry and Research Management, University of California, Berkeley, 30 pp
57. Wiedemann E (1949) Ertragstafeln der wichtigen Holzarten bei verschiedener Durchforstung. Schaper, Hannover, 100 pp
58. World Commission of Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Report of the World Commission of Environment and Development ("Brundtland Report"). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 374 pp
59. Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants XI). J Inst Polytechnics 14(Osaka City Univ, Ser D):107-129