Crowdsourcing assessments for XML ranked retrieval

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5993 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 602-606

  Alonso, Omar ^a   Schenkel, Ralf ^a,b   Theobald, Martin ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; XML;

RANKED RETRIEVAL; RELEVANCE ASSESSMENTS; XML RETRIEVAL;

CROWDSOURCING;

EID: 77952314447     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_57     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Alonso, O., Mizzaro, S.: Can we get rid of TREC assessors? Using Mechanical Turk for relevance assessment. In: SIGIR IR Evaluation Workshop (2009)
2. Snow, R., et al.: Cheap and fast-but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: EMNLP (2008)
3. Piwowarski, B., Trotman, A., Lalmas, M.: Sound and complete relevance assessment for XML retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 27(1), 1-37 (2008)
4. Fuhr, N., Kamps, J., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Trotman, A.: Overview of the INEX 2007 Ad Hoc Track. In: Fuhr, N., Kamps, J., Lalmas, M., Trotman, A. (eds.) INEX 2007. LNCS, vol.4862, pp. 1-23. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
5. Denoyer, L., Gallinari, P.: The Wikipedia XML corpus. SIGIR Forum 40(1), 64-69 (2006)