Accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in quantitative assessment of low density coronary stenosis-a motion phantom study

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 542-548

  Toepker, Michael ^a,c   Schlett, Christopher L ^a   Irlbeck, Thomas ^a   Mahabadi, Amir A ^a   Bamberg, Fabian ^a   Leidecker, Christiane ^b   Donnelly, Patrick ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Coronary vessel phantom; Dual source computed tomography; Noncalcified plaque; Simulated motion; Stenosis quantification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; MOTION; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHY, DUAL-ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77952309905     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1587-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation 68:939-950
2. Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 311:1333-1339
3. Varnauskas E (1988) Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med 319:332-337
4. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, Fisher LD, Takaro T et al (1994) Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 344:563-570
5. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, Edwards FH, Ewy GA et al (2004) ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). Circulation 110:1168-1176
6. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, Ferencik M, Jang IK et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638-2643
7. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Sirol M et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672-677
8. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482-1487
9. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557
10. Rieber J, Meissner O, Babaryka G, Reim S, Oswald M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for the detection and characterization of atherosclerotic plaque composition in ex-vivo coronary specimens: a comparison with histology. Coron Artery Dis 17:425-430
11. Husmann L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Scheffel H, Valenta I et al (2008) Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition: plaque composition and accuracy of cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:895-904
12. Sarwar A, Rieber J, Mooyaart EA, Seneviratne SK, Houser SL et al (2008) Calcified plaque: measurement of area at thin-section flat-panel CT and 64-section multidetector CT and comparison with histopathologic findings. Radiology 249:301-306
13. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron- beam CT. Radiology 216:457-463
14. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dualsource CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256-268
15. Ferencik M, Chan RC, Achenbach S, Lisauskas JB, Houser SL et al (2006) Arterial wall imaging: evaluation with 16-section multidetector CT in blood vessel phantoms and ex vivo coronary arteries. Radiology 240:708-716
16. Funabashi N, Kobayashi Y, Perlroth M, Rubin GD (2003) Coronary artery: quantitative evaluation of normal diameter determined with electron-beam CT compared with cine coronary angiography initial experience. Radiology 226:263-271
17. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147-154
18. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109:14-17 (Pubitemid 38056013)
19. Moselewski F, Ropers D, Pohle K, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M et al (2004) Comparison of measurement of crosssectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 94:1294-1297
20. Dodd JD, Rieber J, Pomerantsev E, Chaithiraphan V, Achenbach S et al (2008) Quantification of nonculprit coronary lesions: comparison of cardiac 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:432-438
21. Rist C, Nikolaou K, Flohr T, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Becker CR (2006) High-resolution ex vivo imaging of coronary artery stents using 64-slice computed tomography-initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1564-1569 (Pubitemid 43871829)
22. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U et al (2006) Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 97:343-348
23. Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S, Pesenti-Rossi D, Daoud B et al (2006) Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-fourslice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:871-876
24. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H (2004) Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo 176:1803-1810
25. Dewey M, Rutsch W, Schnapauff D, Teige F, Hamm B (2007) Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography. Invest Radiol 42:78-84 (Pubitemid 46104887)
26. Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S, Sato K, Tanami Y et al (2005) Quantitative evaluation of coronary arterial stenosis using 16-slice multidetectorrow computed tomography: preliminary evaluation of phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:382-386
27. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U, Nieman K et al (2005) Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 96:784-787
28. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J et al (2005) Flatpanel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40:8-13