A comparison of permutation and parametric testing for between group effective connectivity differences using DCM

NeuroImage

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 509-515

  Goulden, Nia ^a   McKie, Shane ^a   Suckling, John ^b   Williams, Stephen Ross ^a   Anderson, Ian Muir ^a   William Deakin, John Francis ^a   Elliott, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUSAL MODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DYNAMIC CAUSAL MODELING; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PARAMETRIC TEST; PERMUTATION TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT T TEST; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EMOTION; METHODOLOGY; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPRESSION; EMOTIONS; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 77952298604     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.059     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bausell, R.B., Li, Y.F., 2002. Power Analysis for Experimental Research. Cambridge University Press.
2. Berger, V.W., 2000. Pros and cons of permutation tests in clinical trials. Stat. Med. 19, 1319-1328.
3. Bitan, T., Burman, D.D., Lu, D., Cone, N.E., Gitelman, D.R., Mesulam, M.M., Booth, J.R., 2006. Weaker top-down modulation from the left inferior frontal gyrus in children. Neuroimage 33, 991-998.
4. Bitan, T., Cheon, J., Lu, D., Burman, D.D., Gitelman, D.R., Mesulam, M.M., Booth, J.R., 2007. Developmental changes in activation and effective connectivity in phonological processing. Neuroimage 38, 564-575.
5. Brammer, M.J., Bullmore, E.T., Simmons, A., Williams, S.C., Grasby, P.M., Howard, R.J., Woodruff, P.W., Rabe-Hesketh, S, 1997. Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 15, 763-770.
6. Buchel, C., Friston, K.J., 1997. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb. Cortex. 7, 768-778.
7. Cao, F., Bitan, T., Booth, J.R., 2008. Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain. Lang.
8. Catani, M., Jones, D.K., Donato, R., Ffytche, D.H., 2003. Occipito-temporal connections in the human brain. Brain 126, 2093-2107.
9. Cavada, C., Company, T., Tejedor, J., Cruz-Rizzolo, R.J., Reinoso-Suarez, F., 2000. The anatomical connections of the macaque monkey orbitofrontal cortex. A review. Cereb. Cortex. 10, 220-242.
10. Cohen, J., 1976. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Academic Press.
11. de Marco, G., de Bonis, M., Vrignaud, P., Henry-Feugeas, M.C., Peretti, I., 2006. Changes in effective connectivity during incidental and intentional perception of fearful faces. Neuroimage 30, 1030-1037.
12. Edgington, E.S., 1969. Approximate randomization tests. J. Psychol. 72, 143-149.
13. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., 1976. Pictures of Facial Affect. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
14. Fairhall, S.L., Ishai, A., 2007. Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2400-2406.
15. Friston, K.J., Harrison, L., Penny, W., 2003. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273-1302.
16. Ghashghaei, H.T., Barbas, H, 2002. Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 115, 1261-1279.
17. Good, P., 2005. Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses. Springer.
18. Hallahan, M., Rosenthal, R., 1996. Statistical power: concepts, procedures, and applications. Behav. Res. Ther. 34, 489-499.
19. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I., 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 223-233.
20. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., Gobbini, M.I., 2002. Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 59-67.
21. Hayasaka, S., Nichols, T.E., 2004. Combining voxel intensity and cluster extent with permutation test framework. Neuroimage 23, 54-63.
22. Horwitz, B., 2003. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage 19, 466-470.
23. Iidaka, T., Omori, M., Murata, T., Kosaka, H., Yonekura, Y., Okada, T., Sadato, N., 2001. Neural interaction of the amygdala with the prefrontal and temporal cortices in the processing of facial expressions as revealed by fMRI. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 1035-1047.
24. Iwai, E., Yukie, M., 1987. Amygdalofugal and amygdalopetal connections with modalityspecific visual cortical areas in macaques (Macaca fuscata, M. mulatta, and M. fascicularis). J. Comp. Neurol. 261, 362-387.
25. Lindley, D.V., Novick, M.R., 1981. The role of exchangeability in inference. Ann. Stat. 9, 45-58.
26. Ludbrook, J., Dudley, H., 1998. Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. Am. Stat. 52, 127-132.
27. Nichols, T.E., Holmes, A.P., 2002. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 1-25.
28. Rockland, K.S., Van Hoesen, G.W., 1994. Direct temporal-occipital feedback connections to striate cortex (V1) in the macaque monkey. Cereb. Cortex 4, 300-313.
29. Stefanacci, L., Amaral, D.G., 2000. Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: a retrograde tracing study. J. Comp. Neurol. 421, 52-79.
30. Suckling, J., Bullmore, E., 2004. Permutation tests for factorially designed neuroimaging experiments. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22, 193-205.
31. Suckling, J., Davis, M.H., Ooi, C., Wink, A.M., Fadili, J., Salvador, R., Welchew, D., Sendur, L., Maxim, V., Bullmore, E.T., 2006. Permutation testing of orthogonal factorial effects in a language-processing experiment using fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 27, 425-433.
32. Thirion, B., Pinel, P., Meriaux, S., Roche, A., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.B., 2007. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. Neuroimage 35, 105-120.
33. Webster, M.J., Bachevalier, J., Ungerleider, L.G., 1994. Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cereb. Cortex 4, 470-483.