Invasive and flexible: Niche shift in the drosophilid Zaprionus indianus (Insecta, Diptera)

Biological Invasions

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1231-1241

  da Mata, Renata Alves ^a   Tidon, Rosana ^b   Côrtes, Lara Gomes ^c   de Marco Jr , Paulo ^c   Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^c  

^a EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ecological niche modeling; Invasion biology; Invasive species; Maxent; Rapid adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FLY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NICHE PARTITIONING;

AFRICA; INDIA; UNITED STATES;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILIDAE; INSECTA; ZAPRIONUS INDIANUS;

EID: 77952291252     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9542-0     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Allouche O, Steinitz O, Rotem D, Rosenfeld A, Kadmon R (2008) Incorporating distance constraints into species distribution models. J Appl Ecol 45: 599-609.
2. Araujo MB, Guisan A (2006) Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J Biogeogr 33: 1677-1688.
3. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 42-47.
4. Araújo MB, Pearson RG (2005) Equilibrium of species' distributions with climate. Ecography 28: 693-695.
5. Atkinson WD (1979) A comparison of the reproductive strategies of domestic species of Drosophila. J Anim Ecol 48: 53-64.
6. Bächli G (2008) TaxoDros: The database on taxonomy of Drosophilidae. Available at http://taxodros. unizh. ch/. Accessed September 2008.
7. Broennimann O, Treier UA, Muller-Scharer H et al (2007) Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecol Lett 10: 701-709.
8. Chassagnard MT, Kraaijeveld AR (1991) The occurrence of Zaprionus sensu stricto in the Palearctic region (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 27: 495-496.
9. Chassagnard MT, Tsacas L (1993) The subgenus Zaprionus s. str. Definition of species groups and revision of the Vittiger subgroup (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 29: 173-194.
10. Chen P, Wiley EO, Menyset KM (2007) Ecological niche modelling as a predictive tool: silver and bighead carps in North America. Biol Invasions 9: 43-51.
11. David JR, Allemand R, van Herrewege J et al (1983) Ecophysiology: abiotic factors. In: Ashburner M, Carson HL, Thompson JN (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York, pp 105-170.
12. David JR, Araripe LO, Bitner-Mathe BC et al (2006) Quantitative trait analysis and geographic variability of natural populations of Zaprionus indianus, a recent invader in Brazil. Heredity 96: 53-62.
13. DeMarco P, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2008) Spatial analysis improves species distribution modelling during range expansion. Biol Lett 4: 577-580.
14. Dietz H, Edwards PJ (2006) Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87: 1359-1367.
15. Ehrlich PR (1986) Which animal will invade? In: Mooney HA, Drake JA (eds) Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer, New York, pp 79-95.
16. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
17. Farber O, Kadmon R (2003) Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecol Model 160: 115-130.
18. Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin JF, Sanders NJ et al (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16: 24-33.
19. Fitzpatrick MC, Dunn RR, Sanders NJ (2008) Data set matter, but so do evolution and ecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17: 562-565.
20. Gilchrist GW, Huey RB, Serra L (2001) Rapid evolution of wing size clines in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 112: 273-286.
21. Giovanelli JGR, Haddad CFB, Alexandrino J (2008) Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil. Biol Invasions 10: 585-590.
22. GISP (2008) The global invasive species programme. Available at http://www. gisp. org/. Accessed Sept 2008.
23. Goñi B, Fresia P, Calvino M et al (2001) First record of Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in southern localities of Uruguay. Drosoph Inf Serv 84: 61-65.
24. Grossfield J (1978) Non sexual behaviour of Drosophila. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York, pp 1-126.
25. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135: 147-186.
26. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25: 1965-1978.
27. Huey R, Gilchrist G, Hendry A (2005) Using invasive species to study evolution. In: Sax D, Stachowicz J, Gaines D (eds) Species invasions: insights into ecology, evolution & biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 139-184.
28. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
29. Jong G, Bochdanovits Z (2003) Latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster: body size, allozyme frequencies, inversion frequencies, and the insulin-signalling pathway. J Genet 82: 207-223.
30. Karan D, Moreteau B, David JR (1999) Growth temperature and reaction norms of morphometrical traits in a tropical drosophilid: Zaprionus indianus. Heredity 83: 398-407.
31. Karan D, Dubey S, Moreteau B et al (2000) Geographical clines for quantitative traits in natural populations of a tropical drosophilid: Zaprionus indianus. Genetica 108: 91-100.
32. Lambrinos JG (2004) How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85: 2061-2070.
33. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
34. Lobo JM, Jimenez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17: 145-151.
35. Losos JB (2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett 11: 995-1007.
36. Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M et al (2009) Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modeling. Diver Distr 15: 59-69.
37. Meynard CN, Quinn JF (2007) Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J Biogeogr 34: 1455-1469.
38. Nava DE, Nascimento AM, Stein CP et al (2007) Biology, thermal requirements, and estimation of the number of generations of Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) for the main fig producing regions of Brazil. Fla Entomol 90: 495-501.
39. Parkash R, Yadav JP (1993) Geographical clinal variation at 7 esterase-coding loci in Indian populations of Zaprionus indianus. Hereditas 119: 161-170.
40. Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O et al (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 149-158.
41. Peterson AT (2003) Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol 78: 419-433.
42. Peterson AT (2007) Why not why where: the need for more complex models of simpler environmental spaces. Ecol Model 203: 527-530.
43. Peterson AT, Nakazawa Y (2008) Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17: 135-144.
44. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA (2001) Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling: new approaches from bioinformatics attack a pressing problem. Bioscience 51: 363-371.
45. Peterson AT, Soberon J, Sanchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265-1267.
46. Peterson AT, Papes M, Eaton M (2007) Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. Ecography 30: 550-560.
47. Peterson AT, Papes M, Soberon J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Model 213: 63-72.
48. Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161-175.
49. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231-259.
50. Roura-Pascual N, Brotons L, Peterson AT, Thuiller W (2009) Consensual predictions of potential distributional areas for invasive species: a case study of Argentine ants in the Iberian peninsula. Biol Invasions 11: 1017-1031.
51. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS et al (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32: 305-332.
52. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH et al (2007) Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 465-471.
53. Segurado P, Araújo MB (2004) An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J Biogeogr 31: 1555-1568.
54. Silva NM, Fantinel CD, Valente VLS et al (2005) Population dynamics of the invasive species Zaprionus indianus (Gupta) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in communities of drosophilids of Porto Alegre city, southern of Brazil. Neotrop Entoml 34: 363-374.
55. Soberon J (2007) Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol Lett 10: 1115-1123.
56. Steiner FM, Schlick-Steiner BC, VanDerWal J et al (2008) Combined modelling of distribution and niche in invasion biology: a case study of two invasive Tetramorium ant species. Divers Distrib 14: 538-545.
57. Stockwell DRB, Noble IR (1992) Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: A robust and informative method of data analysis. Math Comput Simul 33: 385-390.
58. Throckmorton LH (1975) The phylogeny, ecology, and geography of Drosophila. Invertebrates of genetic interest. Plenum Press, New York, pp 421-469.
59. Thuiller W (2007) Biodiversity-climate change and the ecologist. Nature 448: 550-552.
60. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pysek P et al (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Chang Biol 11: 2234-2250.
61. Tidon R, Leite DF, Leão BFD (2003) Impact of the colonization of Zaprionus (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in different ecosystems of the Neotropical region: 2 years after the invasion. Biol Conserv 112: 299-305.
62. Tsoar A, Allouche O, Steinitz O et al (2007) A comparative evaluation of presence only methods for modelling species distribution. Diver Distrib 13: 397-405.
63. van Der Linde K, Steck GJ, Hibbard K et al (2006) First records of Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae), a pest species on commercial fruits from Panama and the United States of America. Fla Entomol 89: 402-404.
64. Vilela CR (1999) Is Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae) currently colonizing the Neotropical region? Drosoph Inf Serv 82: 37-39.
65. Whitney KD, Gabler CA (2008) Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Divers Distrib 14: 569-580.
66. Wiens JJ, Graham CH (2005) Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36: 519-539.