Rewrite techniques for performance optimization of schema matching processes

Advances in Database Technology - EDBT 2010 - 13th International Conference on Extending Database Technology, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 453-464

  Peukert, Eric ^a   Berthold, Henrike ^a   Rahm, Erhard ^b  

^a SAP RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Matching processes; Schema mapping; Schema matching

Indexed keywords

CURRENT MATCHING; DATA INTEGRATION; FILTER-BASED; MATCHING ALGORITHM; MATCHING PROCESS; MODEL MANAGEMENT; MODELING TOOL; ONTOLOGY ALIGNMENT; OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS; PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS; QUERY OPTIMIZATION; RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS; REWRITE RULES; SCHEMA MAPPINGS; SCHEMA MATCHING; SCHEMAS;

DATA HANDLING; DATA STRUCTURES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; TECHNOLOGY;

MAPPING;

EID: 77952267911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1739041.1739096     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. D. J. Abadi, A. Marcus, S. R. Madden, and K. Hollenbach. Scalable semantic web data management using vertical partitioning. Proc. VLDB, 2007.
2. R. Baxter, P. Christen, and T. Churches. A Comparison of Fast Blocking Methods for Record Linkage. ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation, 2003.
3. P. A. Bernstein and S. Melnik. Model management 2.0: manipulating richer mappings. Proc. SIGMOD, 2007.
4. P. A. Bernstein, S. Melnik, M. Petropoulos, and C. Quix. Industrial-strength schema matching. SIGMOD Rec., 33(4), 2004.
5. C. Caracciolo et al. Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2008. Third Int. Workshop on Ontology Matching, 2008.
6. H.-H. Do. Schema Matching and Mapping Based Data Integration. PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, 2005.
7. H. H. Do and E. Rahm. COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approach. In Proc. VLDB, 2002.
8. H. H. Do and E. Rahm. Matching large schemas: Approaches and evaluation. Inf. Syst., 32(6), 2007.
9. C. Drumm, M. Schmitt, H.-H. Do, and E. Rahm. Quickmig: automatic schema matching for data migration projects. Proc. CIKM, 2007.
10. F. Duchateau, Z. Bellahsene, and R. Coletta. A Flexible Approach for Planning Schema Matching Algorithms. Proc. OTM: On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, 2008.
11. F. Duchateau, Z. Bellahsène, M. Roantree, and M. Roche. An Indexing Structure for Automatic Schema Matching. SMDB-ICDE: International Workshop on Self-Managing Database Systems, 2007.
12. M. Ehrig and S. Staab. QOM - Quick Ontology Mapping. ISWC, 2004.
13. M. Ehrig, S. Staab, and Y. Sure. Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. WWW, 2005.
14. J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko. Ontology matching. Springer-Verlag, 2007.
15. J.-R. Falleri, M. Huchard, M. Lafourcade, and C. Nebut. Metamodel Matching for Automatic Model Transformation Generation. Proc. MoDELS, 2008.
16. L. Gravano et al. Approximate String Joins in a Database (Almost) for Free. Proc. VLDB, 2001.
17. P. A. V. Hall and G. R. Dowling. Approximate String Matching. ACM Comput. Surv., 12, 1980.
18. W. Hu and Y. Qu. Block Matching for Ontologies. ISWC, 2006.
19. W. Hu and Y. Qu. Falcon-AO: A practical ontology matching system. Web Semant., 6(3), 2008.
20. W. Hu, Y. Qu, and G. Cheng. Matching large ontologies: A divide-and-conquer approach. Data Knowl. Eng., 67(1), 2008.
21. Y. Lee, M. Sayyadian, A. Doan, and A. S. Rosenthal. etuner: tuning schema matching software using synthetic scenarios. The VLDB Journal, 16(1), 2007.
22. J. Li, J. Tang, Y. Li, and Q. Luo. RiMOM: A Dynamic Multistrategy Ontology Alignment Framework. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(8), 2009.
23. J. Madhavan, P. A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. Proc. VLDB, 2001.
24. S. Melnik, H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm. Similarity flooding: a versatile graph matching algorithm and its application to schema matching. Proc. ICDE, 2002.
25. M. Mochol, A. Jentzsch, and J. Euzenat. Applying an Analytic Method for Matching Approach Selection. The First International Workshop on Ontology Matching, 2006.
26. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 59, 2003.
27. L. Palopoli, G. Terracina, and D. Ursino. DIKE: a system supporting the semi-automatic construction of cooperative information systems from heterogeneous databases. Softw. Pract. Exper., 33, 2003.
28. H. Paulheim. On Applying Matching Tools to Large-scale Ontologies. The Third International Workshop on Ontology Matching, 2008.
29. E. Rahm and P. A. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 10, 2001.
30. K. Saleem, Z. Bellahsene, and E. Hunt. PORSCHE: Performance ORiented SCHEma mediation. Inf. Syst., 33, 2008.
31. P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches. Journal on Data Semantics IV, 2005.
32. M. Smiljanic, M. van Keulen, and W. Jonker. Using Element Clustering to Increase the Efficiency of XML Schema Matching. Proc. ICDE Workshops, 2006.
33. H. Tan and P. Lambrix. A Method for Recommending Ontology Alignment Strategies. ISWC/ASWC, 2007.
34. Yves R. Jean-Mary and M. R. Kabuka. Ontology matching with semantic verification. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web.