Does monocular visual space contain planes?

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 134, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 40-47

  Koenderink, Jan J ^a,d   Albertazzi, Liliana ^b   van Doorn, Andrea J ^c   van Ee, Raymond ^d   van de Grind, Wim A ^e   Kappers, Astrid M L ^d   Lappin, Joe S ^f   Farley Norman, J ^g   Phillips, Flip ^h   Pont, Sylvia C ^c   Richards, Whitman A ⁱ   Todd, James T ^j   Verstraten, Frans A J ^e   de Vries, Sjoerd ^k  

^a Stijn) Oomes, A H J   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

ⁱ MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^j OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k TNO   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Monocular stereopsis; Visual space

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; LEARNING; MONOCULAR VISION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 77952237183     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bennett M.K. Affine and projective geometry 1995, Wiley, New York.
2. Berger M. A panoramic view of Riemannian geometry 2007, Springer, New York, (Note 1.1.3.1. and Section 6.1.4, pp. 231-233).
3. Blank A.A. The Luneburg theory of binocular visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1953, 43:717-721.
4. Buseman H. Geometry of geodesics 1955, Academic Press, New York.
5. Enright J.T. Paradoxical monocular stereopsis and perspective vergence. Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments 1991, 567-576. Taylor & Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA, USA. S.R. Ellis (Ed.).
6. Foley J. Desarguesian property in visual space. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1964, 54:684-692.
7. Helmholtz H.von Über die Thatsachen, die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. Göttinger Nachrichten 1868, 15:193-221.
8. Hoffman, D. (in press). The interface theory of perception: Natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction. In S. Dickinson, M. Tarr, A. Leonardis, B. Schiele (Eds.), Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. The structure of visual spaces. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 2008, 31:171-187.
10. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Todd J.T. Wide distribution of local sign in the normal population. Psychological Research 2009, 73:14-22.
11. Luneburg R.K. Mathematical analysis of binocular vision 1947, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
12. Moulton F.R. A simple non-desarguesian plane geometry. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1902, 3:192-195.
13. Norman J.F., Crabtree C.E., Clayton A.M., Norman H.F. The perception of distances and spatial relationships in natural outdoor environments. Perception 2005, 34:1315-1324.
14. Yaglom I.M. A simple non-Euclidean geometry and its physical basis: An elementary account of Galilean geometry and the Galilean principle of relativity 1979, Springer, New York, (translated from the Russian by A. Shenitzer).