Dimension reduction in human functioning and disability outcomes research: Graphical models versus principal components analysis

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1000-1010

  Reinhardt, Jan D ^a,b,c,d   Fellinghauer, Bernd A G ^a,e   Strobl, Ralf ^c,d   Stucki, Gerold ^a,b  

^a SWISS PARAPLEGIC RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUCERNE   (Switzerland)

^c SPF   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dimension reduction; Disability; Graphical models; Human functioning; ICF; PCA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 77952215218     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638281003775410     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: WHO Press; 2001.
2. Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S. The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet 2006;368:1219-1221.
3. Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Ustun TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1173-1187.
4. Nagi S. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlov AR, editors. Disability in America: a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1991. pp 309-327.
5. Cantor N, Sanderson CA. Life task participation and wellbeing: the importance of taking part in daily life. In: Kahnemann D, Diener E, Schwarz N, editors. Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 1999. pp 230-243.
6. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with healthrelated quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995;273:59-65.
7. Strobl R, Stucki G, Grill E, Müller M, Mansmann U. Graphical models illustrated complex associations between variables describing human functioning. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:922-933.
8. Reinhardt JD, Mansmann U, Fellinghauer BAG, Strobl R, Grill E, von Elm E, Stucki G. Functioning and Disability in People Living with Spinal Cord Injury in High- and Low- Resource Countries: A Comparative Analysis of 14 countries. 2010. in preparation.
9. Reinhardt JD, Mansmann U, Fellinghauer BAG, Strobl R, Grill E, von Elm E, Stucki G. Functioning and Disability in People Living with Spinal Cord Injury in High- and Low-Resource Countries: A Comparative Analysis of 14 countries. 5/2010. Manuscript.
10. Dunteman G. Principal components analysis. New York: Sage; 1989.
11. Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science 2004;303:799-805.
12. Hood L, Heath JR, Phelps ME, Lin B. Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine Science. 2004;306:640-643.
13. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
14. Burke W. Genomics as a probe for disease biology. N Engl J Med 2003;349:969-974.
15. Goh K-I, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási A-L. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:8685-8690.
16. Biering-Sorensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue SW, Post MW, Montero F, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord 2006;44:541-546.
17. King G, Honaker J, Joseph A, Scheve K. Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. Am Polit Sci Rev 2001;95:49-69. (Pubitemid 33390251)
18. Meinshausen N, Buehlmann P. High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the LASSO. Ann Stat 2006;34: 1436-1462.
19. Breimann L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 1996;24: 123-240.
20. Jackson J. A user's guide to principal components analysis. New York: Wiley; 2003.
21. Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer; 2002.
22. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:141-151.
23. O'Connor BP. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAPtest. Behav Res MethInstrumComput 2000;32:396-402.
24. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009.
25. N.N. SPSS for Windows. Rel. 17.0.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2008.
26. Kayes N, McPerson K. Measuring what matters: does 'objectivity' necessarily mean good science? Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1018-1026.
27. Stucki G, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Cieza A. ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008;44:315-328.
28. Goldenfeld N, Kadanoff LP. Simple lessons from complexity. Science 1999;284:87.
29. Levack W, Kayes N, Fadyl J. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:986-1006.