The burdens of visual culture studies

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 5-12

  Bauerlein, Mark ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952204618     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/AEPR.106.1.5-12     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Chapman, Laura H. 2003. “Studies of the Mass Arts.” Studies in Art Education 44 (3): 23-45.
2. Dorfmann, Ariel, and Armand Mattelart. 1971. How to Read Donald Duck: Imperialist Ideology in the Disney Comic. Trans. David Kunzle. New York: International General.
3. Duncum, Paul. 2004. “Visual Culture Isn’t Just Visual: Multiliteracy, Multimodality, and Meaning.” Studies in Art Education 45 (3): 252-64.
4. Hayek, F. A. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies in the Abuse of Reason. New York: Free Press.
5. Knight, Wanda B., Karen Keifer-Boyd, and Patricia M. Amburgy. 2004. “Commentary: Revealing Power: A Visual Culture Orientation to Student-Teacher Relationships.” Studies in Arts Education 45 (4): 270-73.
6. Pauly, Nancy. 2004. “Interpreting Visual Culture as Cultural Narratives in Teacher Education.” Studies in Art Education 44 (3): 264-84.
7. Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1958. Collected Papers. Vol. 8. Ed. Arthur W. Burks.
8. Tavin, Kevin M. 2003. “Wrestling with Angels, Searching for Ghosts: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Visual Culture.” Studies in Arts Education 44 (3): 197-213.
9. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Visual Culture Cluster. http://www.visualculture. wisc.edu/whatisvisualculture.htm (accessed June 30, 2004).
10. Walker, J., and S. Chaplin. 1997. Visual Culture: An Introduction. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.