Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns

British Dental Journal

Volumn 208, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Sonmez, D ^a   Duruturk, L ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; DENTAL ALLOY; STAINLESS STEEL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MOLAR; PROGNOSIS; PULPOTOMY; STAINLESS STEEL; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 77952189797     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.446     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Massler M. Preventive endodontics: vital pulp therapy. Dent Clin North Am 1967; Nov: 663-673.
2. Kopel H M. Considerations for the direct pulp capping procedure in primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child 1992; 59: 141-149.
3. Waterhouse P J, Nunn J H, Whitworth J M. An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley's formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 32-36.
4. Waterhouse P J, Nunn J H, Whitworth J M, Soames J V. Primary molar pulp therapy - histological evaluation of failure. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10: 313-321.
5. Fuks A B. Current concepts in vital primary pulp therapy. Eur J Pediatr Dent 2002; 3: 115-120.
6. Stanley H R, Pameijer C H. Dentistry's friend: calcium hydroxide. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 1-3.
7. Guelmann M, Fair J, Turner C, Courts F J. The success of emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 217-220.
8. Camp J H. Pulp therapy for primary and young permanent teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1984; 28: 651-668.
9. McDonald R E, Avery D R, Dean J A. Treatment of deep caries, vital pulp exposure and pulpless teeth. In McDonald R E, Avery D R (eds) Dentistry for the child and the adolescent. 7th ed. pp 413-437. St.Louis: Mosby, 2000.
10. Davina A B. A conservative approach to the pulpotomy in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 103-105.
11. El-Kalla I H, Garcia-Godoy F. Fracture strength of adhesively restored pulpotomized primary molars. ASCD J Dent Child 1999; 66: 238-242.
12. Droter J A. Pulp therapy in primary teeth. J Dent Child 1967; 34: 507-510.
13. Starkey P E. Management of deep caries and pulpally involved teeth in children. In Goldman H M (ed) Current therapy in dentistry. pp 896-932. St Louis: Mosby, 1968.
14. Croll T P, Killian C M. Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy and stainless steel crown restoration of a primary molar. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 383-388.
15. Seale N S. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 501-505.
16. Guelmann M, McIlwain M E, Primosch R E. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 24-27.
17. Doyle W A, McDonald R E, Mitchell D F. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide in pulpotomy. ASDC J Dent Child 1962; 29: 86-97.
18. Heilig J, Yates J, Siksin M, McKnight J, Turner J. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy for primary teeth: a clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108: 775-777.
19. Mathewson R J, Primosch R E. Pulp treatment. In Mathewson R J, Primosch R E (eds) Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry. 3rd ed. pp 257-280. Chicago: Quintessence, 1995.
20. Fishman S A, Udin R D, Good D L, Rodef F. Success of electrofulguration pulpotomies covered by zinc oxide and eugenol or calcium hydroxide: a clinical study. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 385-390.
21. Gruythuysen R J, Weerheijm K L. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light-cured cavity sealing material after two years. ASDC J Dent Child 1997; 64: 251-253.
22. Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks A B. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 15-18.
23. Sasaki H, Ogawa T, Koreeda M, Ozaki T, Sobue S, Ooshima T. Electrocoagulation extends the indication of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in the primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 275-278.
24. Agamy H A, Bakery N S, Mounir M M, Avery D R. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp-capping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 302-309.
25. Schroeder U. A 2-year follow-up of primary molars pulpotomized with a gentle technique and capped with calcium hydroxide. Scand J Dent Res 1978; 86: 273-278
26. Schroeder U, Szpringer-Nodzak M, Janicha J, Wacinska M, Budny J, Mlosek K. A one-year follow-up of partial pulpotomy and calcium hydroxide capping in primary molars. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 304-306.
27. Goldberg F, Massone E J, Spielberg C. Evaluation of the dentinal bridge after pulpotomy and calcium hydroxide dressing. J Endod 1984; 10: 318-320.
28. Özata F, Pişkin B, Erdilek N, Aktener O, Tuncer A V. Comparison of calcium hydroxide and formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth in lambs: preliminary study. J Endod 1987; 13: 328-335.
29. Fadavi S, Anderson A W. A comparison of the pulpal response to freeze dried bone, calcium hydroxide and zinc oxide-eugenol in primary teeth in two cynomolgus monkeys. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 52-56.
30. Osborne J W, Summitt J B, Roberts H W. The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 439-447.
31. Markovic D, Zivojinovic V, Vucetic M. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005; 6: 133-138.
32. Troutman K C, Reisbick M H, Berson R B, Good D L, Gutmann J l. Pulp therapy. In Stewart R E, Barber T K, Toutman K C, Wei SHY (eds) Pediatric dentistry: scientific foundations and clinical practice. pp 908-941. St. Louis: Mosby Company, 1982.
33. Holan G, Fuks A B, Keltz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless still crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 212-216.
34. Via W F Jr. Evaluation of deciduous molars treated by pulpotomy and calcium hydroxide. J Am Dent Assoc 1955; 50: 34-43.
35. Eidelman E, Touma B, Ulmansky M. Pulp pathology in deciduous teeth: clinical and histological correlations. Isr J Med Sci 1968; 4: 1244-1248.
36. Fuks A B. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 571-596.
37. Hobson P. Pulp treatment of deciduous teeth. 1. Factors affecting diagnosis and treatment. Br Dent J 1970; 128: 232-238.
38. Rayner J A, Southam I I. Pulp changes in deciduous teeth associated with deep carious dentin. J Dent 1979; 7: 39-42.
39. Farooq N S, Coll J A, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278-286.
40. Holland I S, Walls A W, Wallwork M A, Murray J J. The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. Br Dent J 1986; 161: 255-258.
41. Camp J H, Barrett E J, Pulver F. Pediatric endodontics: endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. In Cohen S, Burns R C (eds) Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. pp 797-816. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002.
42. Cvec M. A clinical report on partial pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide in permanent incisors with complicated crown fractures. J Endod 1978; 4: 232-237.
43. Pereira J C, Stanley H R. Pulp capping: influence of the exposure site on pulp healing - histologic and radiographic study in dogs' pulp. J Endod 1981; 7: 213-223.
44. Greeley M C B. Pulp therapy for the primary and the young permanent dentition. In Forrester D C, Wagner M L, Fleming J (eds) Pediatric dental medicine. pp 456-460. Philedelphia; Lea & Febiger, 1981.
45. Magnusson B O. Pulpotomy in primary molars: long-term clinical and histological evaluation. Int Endod J 1980; 13: 143-155.
46. Cox C F, Bergenholtz G, Fitzgerald M et al. Capping of the dental pulp mechanically exposed to the oral microfl ora - a 5 week observation of wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 327-339.
47. Mejare I. Pulpotomy of primary molars with coronal or total pulpitis using formocresol technique. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87: 208-216.
48. Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks A B. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 129-136.
49. Browne R M, Tobias R S. Microbial microleakage and pulpal infl ammation: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986; 2: 177-183.
50. Pashley E L, Tao L, Pashley D H. The sealing properties of temporary filling materials. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60: 292-297.
51. Stanley H R. Pulp capping: conserving the dental pulp - can it be done? Is it worth it? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 628-639.
52. Braff M H. A comparison between stainless steel crowns and multi-surface amalgams in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child 1975; 42: 474-478.
53. Roberts J F, Sheriff M. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 237-244.
54. Randall R C. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 489-500.
55. Al-Zayer M A, Straffon L H, Feigal R J, Welch K B. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2003; 25: 29-36.
56. Fuks A B, Jones P C, Michaeli Y, Bimstein E. Pulp response to collagen and gluteraldehyde in pulpotomized primary teeth of baboons. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 142-150.