Medial hip neck fracture: Influence of pre-operative delay on the quality of outcome: Results of data from the external in-hospital quality assurance within the framework of secondary;Mediale Schenkelhalsfraktur: Einfluss des Versorgungszeitpunkts auf die Ergebnisqualität: Ergebnisse der Daten der externen stationären Qualitätssicherung im Rahmen sekundärer Datennutzung

Unfallchirurg

Volumn 113, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 287-292

  Smektala, R ^a   Hahn, S ^b   Schrader P ^b   Bonnaire, F ^c   Schulze Raestrup, U ^d   Siebert, H ^e   Fischer, B ^b   Boy, O ^b  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung GmbH BQS   (Germany)

^c ACADEMIC TEACHING HOSPITAL DRESDEN FRIEDRICHSTADT   (Germany)

^d Abteilung Qualitätssicherung   (Germany)

^e Generalsekretar der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie E V Berlin   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complications; Hip fracture; In hospital mortality; Preoperative waiting time; Propensity score matched pairs controlled analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DECUBITUS; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT STUDIES; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRESSURE ULCER; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 77952189192     PISSN: 01775537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-009-1674-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Austin PC (2008) A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 27(12):2037-2049
2. Barsoum WK, Helfland R, Krebs V, Whinney C (2006) Managing perioperative risk in the hip fracture patient. Cleve Clin J Med 73 [suppl 1]:46-50
3. Bottle A, Aylin P (2006) Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study. BMJ 332(7547):947-951
4. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH (BQS 2007a) BQS-Qualitätsindikatorendatenbank 2006. http://www.bqs- qualitaetsindikatoren.de/2006 (Recherchedatum: 14.11.2008)
5. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH (BQS 2007b) BQS-Bundesauswertung 2006. http://www.bqs-outcome.de/Webs/bqs/outcome/2006/ ergebnisse/(Recherchedatum: 14.11.2008)
6. Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH (BQS 2007c) Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS-Qualitätsreport 2006. In: Veit C, Bauer J, Döbler K et al (Hrsg) Düsseldorf; 2007. http://www.bqs- qualitaetsreport.de/2006/ergebnisse/pdf/qr2006.pdf (Recherchedatum: 14.11.2008)
7. Chilov MN, Cameron ID, March LN (2003) Evidence-based guidelines for fixing broken hips: an update. MJA 179(9):489-493
8. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) (2008) Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie - Schenkelhalsfraktur des Erwachsenen. AWMF Leitlinien-Register Nr. 012/001, Entwicklungsstufe 2. http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/AWMF/ll/012-001.htm (Recherchedatum: 04.02.2009)
9. Elliott J, Beringer T, Kee F et al (2003) Predicting survival after treatment for fracture of the proximal femur and the effect of delays to surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 56:788-795
10. Gdalevich M, Cohen D, Yosef D, Tauber C (2004) Morbiduty and Mortality after hip fracture:the impact of operative delay. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:334-340
11. Grimes JP, Greory PM, Noveck H et al (2002) The effects of time to surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture. Am J Med 112:702-709
12. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB (1984) Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery and complication. Clin Orthop Res 186:45-56
13. Kirke PN, Sutton M, Burke H, Daly L (2002) Outcome of hip fracture in older Irish women: a 2-year follow up of subjects in a case-control study. Injury 33(5):387-391
14. Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE et al (2002) Mortality, disability and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(10):1644-1650
15. McGuire KJ, Bernstein J, Polsky D, Silber JH (2004) Delays until surgery after hip fracture increases mortality. Clin Orthop Res 428:294-301
16. March LM, Chamberlain AC, Cameron ID et al (1999) How best to fix a broken hip. MJA 170:489-494
17. Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM (2005) Early mortality after hip fracture:is delay before surgery important? JBJS 87-A:483-489
18. Orosz GM, Hannan EL, Magaziner J et al (2002) Hip fracture in older patient: reasons for delay in hospitalization and timing of surgical repair. JAGS 50:1336-1340
19. Obertacke U, Nast-Kolb D (2000) Besonderheiten des Unfalls, der Verletzung und der chirurgischen Versorgung im höheren Lebensalter. Unfallchirurg 103:227-239
20. Manninger J, Kazar GY, Fekete E et al (1985) Avoidance of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, following fractures of the femoral neck, by early reduction and internal fixation. Injury 16(7):437-448
21. Orosz GM, Magaziner J, Hannan EL et al (2004) Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes. JAMA 291(14):1738-1743
22. Parker MJ, Pryor GA (1992) The timing of surgery for proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74-B(2):203-205
23. Petersen MB, Jorgensen HL, Hansen K, Duus BR (2006) Factors affecting postoperative mortality of patients with displaced femoral neck fracture. Injury 37(8):705-711
24. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL. 2008. http://www.R-project.org (Recherchedatum: 04.02.2009)
25. Roberts SE, Goldacre MJ (2003) Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968-1998: database study. BMJ 327(7418):771-775
26. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41-55
27. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Prevention and management of hip fracture in older people. SIGN Publication 56. October 2002. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/56/ (Recherchedatum: 04.02.2009)
28. Sekhon JS (2008) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Software VV(II):1-47
29. Smektala R, Grams A, Pientka L, Schulze Raestrup U (2008) Leitlinie oder Landrecht bei der Schenkelhalsfraktur? Eine Analyse der Versorgungssituation Nordrhein-Westfalen. Dtsch Ärztebl 105(16):295-302
30. Stoddart J, Horne G, Devane P (2002) Influence of preoperative medical status and delay to surgery on death following a hip fracture. ANZ J Surg 72(6):405-407
31. Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ et al (1995) Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77(10):1551-1556