Cardiac CT angiography

Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 236-239

  Truong, Quynh A ^a   Siegel, Emily ^a   Cannon, Christopher P ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AORTA DISSECTION; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; BYPASS SURGERY; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DOSIMETRY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FATALITY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEART CYCLE; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEART MOVEMENT; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; IONIZING RADIATION; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUNG EMBOLISM; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MORTALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NOTE; PASSIVE SMOKING; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SEATBELT; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; THORAX PAIN; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 77952185371     PISSN: 15306550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3909/ricm0513     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761-1791.
2. Einstein AJ. Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:545-547.
3. Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Prospective ECG-triggered sequential scan protocol for coronary dual-source CT angiography: initial experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:231-239.
4. Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305.
5. George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:174-182.
6. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056-1065.
7. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA. 2007;298:317-323.
8. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340-2348.
9. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191-197.
10. Schindera ST, Nelson RC, Yoshizumi T, et al. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2009;16;997-1002.
11. Stolzmann P, Leschka S, Scheffel H, et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;249:71-80.
12. Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML, et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535-546.
13. Mori S, Nishizawa K, Kondo C, et al. Effective doses in subjects undergoing computed tomography cardiac imaging with the 256-multislice CT scanner. Eur J Radiol. 2008;65:442-448.