Estimating the effect of individual time preferences on the use of disease screening

Southern Economic Journal

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1005-1031

  David Bradford, W ^a   Zoller, James ^b   Silvestri, Gerard A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952169501     PISSN: 00384038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.1005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ades, Philip, Thomas E. Kottke, Nancy Houston Miller, John C. McGrath, N. Burgess Record, and Sandra S. Record. 2002. Task Force #3: Getting results: Who, where, how? Journal of the American College of Cardiology 40(4): 615-630
2. Ai, C., and E. Norton. 2003. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters 80(1): 123-129 (Pubitemid 36598410)
3. Becker, G., and K. Murphy. 1988. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96(4): 675-700.
4. Berger, M., and J. Leigh. 1989. Schooling, self-selection, and health. Journal of Human Resources 24(3): 433-455
5. Boardman, A., D. Greenberg, A. Vining, and D. Weimer. 1996. Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practices. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Bradford, W. David, Andrew N. Kleit, Marie A. Krausel-Wood, and Richard N. Re. 2004. Double-bounded dichotomous choice method to assess willingness to pay for telemedicine. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 10(6): 325-330
7. Cameron, T., and M. James. 1987. Efficient estimation methods for use with "closed ended" contingent valuation survey data. Review of Economics and Statistics 69: 269-276
8. Coller, M., and M. Williams. 1999. Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics 2(l): 107-127
9. Diamond, Peter, and Jerry Hausman. 1994. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic-Perspectives 8(4): 45-64.
10. Ehrlich, I., and H. Chuma. 1990. A model of the demand for longevity and the value of life extension. Journal of Political Economy 98(4): 761-782
11. Farrell, P., and V. Fuchs. 1982. Schooling and health: The cigarette connection. Journal of Health Economics l(3): 217-230
12. Frederick, Shane, George Loewenstein, and Ted O'Donoghue. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature XL: 351-401.
13. Giorgianni, S., J. Grana, and J. Keith. 2003. Heart disease: An all-out attack. Pfizer Journal 7(4): 1-49.
14. Greene, William H. 2002. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Grossman, M. 1972. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy 80(2): 223-255
16. Grossman, M. 2000. The human capital model. In Handbook of health economics, edited by A. Culyer and J. Newhouse. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
17. Grossman, M., and R. Kaestner. 1997. Effects of education on health. In The social benefits of education, edited by J. Behrman and N. Stacey. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 69-123.
18. Hanemann, M. 1985. Some issues in continuous-and discrete response contingent valuation studies. Northeast Journal of Agricultural Economics 14(1): 5-13.
19. Hanemann, M., J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen. 1991. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4): 1255-1263
20. Harrison, G., M. Lau, and M. Williams. 2002. Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark. American Economic Review 92(5): 1606-1617
21. Kanninen, B. 1993. Optimal experimental design for double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Economics 69(2): 138-146
22. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). 2004. Practice guidelines in oncology screening. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
23. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). 2001. Third report of the national cholesterol education program expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel iii). Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Health, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.
24. Ockene, Ira S., Laura L. Hayman, Richard C. Pasternak, Eleanor Schron, and Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob. 2002. Task Force #4: Adherence issues and behavior changes: Achieving a long-term solution. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 40(4): 365-383
25. Picone, Gabriel, Frank Sloan, and D. Taylor. 2004. Effects of risk and time preference and expected longevity on demand for medical tests. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(l): 39-53.
26. Terza, Joseph V., Anirban Basu, and Paul J. Rathouz. 2008. Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics 27(3): 531-543
27. Tudiver, F., and E. Fuller-Thompson. 1999. Who has screening mammography: Results from the 1994-1995 national population health survey. Canadian Family Physician 45: 1901-1907
28. Van Doorslaer, E. 1987. Health, knowledge, and the demand for medical care: An econometric analysis. Maastricht, The Netherlands: van Gorcum and Comp.
29. Wagstaff, A. 1986. The demand for health: Some new empirical evidence. Journal of Health Economics 5(2): 195-233. (Pubitemid 16004913)
30. Wagstaff, A. 1993. The demand for health: An empirical reformulation of the Grossman model. Health Economics 2(2): 189-198
31. Warner,J.,andS.Pleeter.2001.Thepersonaldiscountrate: Evidencefrommilitarydownsizingprograms.AmericanEconomicReview91(l):33-53. (Pubitemid33594469)
32. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Zweifel, P., and F. Breyer. 1997. Health economics. New York: Oxford University Press.