Design rule hierarchies and parallelism in software development tasks

ASE2009 - 24th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 197-208

  Wong, Sunny ^a   Cai, Yuanfang ^a   Valetto, Giuseppe ^a   Simeonov, Georgi ^a   Sethi, Kanwarpreet ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Project management; Software architecture

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATION PROJECTS; CONCURRENT DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN MODELS; DESIGN RULES; DEVELOPMENT TASKS; MAILING LISTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE MODULES; SOFTWARE PROJECT; SOURCE CODES; TECHNICAL COMMUNICATIONS;

ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DESIGN; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 77952168167     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2009.53     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. D. L. Parnas, "On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules," Communications of the ACM, vol.15, no.12, pp. 1053-1058, Dec. 1972.
2. M. E. Conway, "How do committees invent?" Datamation, vol.14, no.4, pp. 28-31, 1968.
3. M. Cataldo, P. Wagstrom, J. D. Herbsleb, and K. M. Carley, "Identification of coordination requirements: Implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools," in Proc. ACM Conf on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Nov. 2006, pp. 353-362.
4. J. D. Herbsleb and A. Mockus, "Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering," in Proc. 11th ACM SIGSOFT Intl Symp on the Foundations of Soft Eng, Sep. 2003, pp. 138-1137
5. C. R. B. de Souza, D. Redmiles, L.-T. Cheng, D. Millen, and J. Patterson, "How a good software practice thwarts collaboration: The multiple roles of APIs in software development," in Proc. 12th ACM SIGSOFT Intl Symp on the Foundations of Soft Eng, Nov. 2004, pp. 221-230.
6. C. R. B. de Souza, S. Quirk, E. Trainer, and D. Redmiles, "Supporting collaborative software development through the visualization of socio-technical dependencies," in Proc. Intl ACM SIGGROUP Conf on Supporting Group Work, 2007, pp. 147-156.
7. C. Amrit and J. van Hillegersberg, "Detecting coordination problems in collaborative software development environments," Information Systems Management, vol.25, no.1, pp. 57-70, 2008.
8. C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules, Vol.1: The Power of Modularity. MIT Press, 2000.
9. M. Cataldo, J. D. Herbsleb, and K. M. Carley, "Sociotechnical congruence: A framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity," in Proc. 2nd Intl Symp on Empirical Soft Eng and Measurement, Oct. 2008, pp. 2-11.
10. Y. Cai, "Modularity in design: Formal modeling and automated analysis," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, Aug. 2006.
11. Y. Cai and K. Sullivan, "Simon: A tool for logical design space modeling and analysis," in Proc. 20th IEEE/ACM Intl Conf on Automated Soft Eng, Nov. 2005, pp. 329-332.
12. -, "Modularity analysis of logical design models," in Proc. 21st IEEE/ACM Intl Conf on Automated Soft Eng, Sep. 2006, pp. 91-102.
13. S. Wong and Y. Cai, "Predicting change impact from logical models," in Proc. 25th IEEE Intl Conf on Soft Maintenance, Sep. 2009.
14. Lattix Inc., "The Lattix approach whitepaper," http://www.lattix.com, 2004.
15. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. M. Vlissides, Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Nov. 1994.
16. A. Egyed, W. Shen, and K. Wang, "Maintaining life perspectives during the refinement of UML class structures," in Proc. 8th Intl Conf on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, Apr. 2005, pp. 310-325.
17. N. Sangal, E. Jordan, V. Sinha, and D. Jackson, "Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture," in Proc. 20th ACM SIGPLAN Conf on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, Oct. 2005, pp. 167-176.
18. K. Sullivan, W. G. Griswold, Y. Cai, and B. Hallen, "The structure and value of modularity in software design," in Proc. 8th ACM SIGSOFT Intl Symp on the Foundations of Soft Eng, Sep. 2001, pp. 99-108. (Pubitemid 35466915)
19. K. Sethi, Y. Cai, S. Wong, A. Garcia, and C. Sant'Anna, "From retrospect to prospect: Assessing modularity and stability from software architecture," in Proc. 8th Working IEEE/IFIP Intl Conf on Software Architecture, Sep. 2009.
20. E. W. Dijkstra, "The structure of the "THE" - multiprogramming system," Communications of the ACM, vol.11, no.5, pp. 341-346, May 1968.
21. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
22. D. L. Parnas, "Designing software for ease of extension and contraction," Transactions on Soft Eng, vol.5, no.2, pp. 128-138, Mar. 1979.
23. P. Jalote and G. Jain, "Assigning tasks in a 24-hour soft development model," in Proc. 11th Asia-Pacific Soft Eng Conf, Dec. 2004, pp. 309-315.
24. L. C. Briand, Y. Labiche, and Y. Wang, "An investigation of graph-based class integration test order strategies," Transactions on Soft Eng, vol.29, no.7, pp. 594-607, Jul. 2003.