Simple stimuli, simple strategies

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 107, Issue 16, 2010, Pages

  Gentner, Timothy Q ^a   Fenn, Kimberly ^b   Margoliash, Daniel ^c   Nusbaum, Howard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; GRAMMAR; LEARNING; LETTER; LINGUISTICS; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STARLING;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FINCHES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; STARLINGS;

EID: 77952162752     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000501107     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Gentner TQ, Fenn KM, Margoliash D, Nusbaum HC (2006) Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature 440:1204-1207.
2. van Heijningen CAA, de Visser J, Zuidema W, ten Cate C (2009) Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20538-20543.
3. Cook RG, Wasserman EA (2006) Relational Discrimination Learning in Pigeons. Comparative Cognition: Experimental Explorations of Animal Intelligence, eds Wasserman EA and Zentall TR. (New York: Oxford University Press), pp 307-324.
4. Pothos EM (2007) Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychol Bull 133:227-244.