|
Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 391-392
|
Post hoc magnetic resonance imaging cannot justify the conclusions of WHIMS
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONJUGATED ESTROGEN;
CONJUGATED ESTROGEN PLUS MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE;
ESTROGEN;
ESTROGEN PLUS GESTAGEN;
GESTAGEN;
MEDROXYPROGESTERONE;
PLACEBO;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
AGING;
BRAIN SIZE;
CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL STUDY;
COGNITION;
COGNITIVE DEFECT;
DEMENTIA;
EDITORIAL;
FRONTAL LOBE;
FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
HIPPOCAMPUS;
HORMONAL THERAPY;
LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM;
MEMORY;
MENOPAUSE;
NEUROTOXICITY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
POSTMENOPAUSE;
PRIMARY PREVENTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
RISK FACTOR;
RISK REDUCTION;
WOMEN'S HEALTH;
WOMEN'S HEALTH INITIATIVE MEMORY STUDY;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BRAIN;
COGNITION DISORDERS;
DEMENTIA;
ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
ESTROGENS, CONJUGATED (USP);
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE;
|
EID: 77952121747
PISSN: 09513590
EISSN: 14730766
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3109/09513591003630229 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (8)
|