The forensic use of mobile phone flasher boxes

Digital Investigation

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 168-178

  Jonkers, Kevin ^a  

^a Fox IT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flasher box; Forensic tool; Forensic validation; Memory acquisition; Mobile phone forensics

Indexed keywords

MOBILE PHONES; TELEPHONE SETS;

FLASHER BOXES; FORENSIC TOOLS; FORENSIC VALIDATION; MEMORY ACQUISITIONS; MOBILE PHONE FORENSICS;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES;

EID: 77952112123     PISSN: 17422876     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2010.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). Good practice guide for computer based evidence. http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/gpg_computer_based_evidence_v3.pdf [accessed 04.06.08]
2. Al-Zarouni M. Introduction to mobile phone flasher devices and considerations for their use in mobile phone forensics. http://scissec.scis.ecu.edu.au/conference_proceedings/2007/forensics/15_Al-Zarouni%20-%20Introduction%20to%20Mobile%20Phone%20Flasher%20Devices%20and%20Considerations%20for%20their%20Use%20in%20Mobile%20Phone%20Forensics.pdf [accessed 15.01.08]
3. Baggili I., Mislan R., and Rogers M. Mobile phone forensics tool testing - a database driven approach. International Journal of Digital Evidence 6 2 (2007)
4. Breeuwsma M., de Jongh M., Klaver C., van derKnijff R., and Roeloffs M. Forensic data recovery from flash memory. Small Scale Digital Device Forensics Journal 1 1 (June 2007) 1-17
5. Carrier B. Defining digital forensic examination and analysis tools using abstraction layers. International Journal of Digital Evidence 1 4 (2003)
6. Casey E. What does "forensically sound" really mean?. Digital Investigation 4 2 (June 2007) 49-50
7. Farmer D., and Venema W. Forensic discovery (2006), Addison Wesley Professional [Second Printing]
8. Gerber M., and Leeson J. Formalization of computer input and output - the Hadley model. Digital Investigation 1 3 (September 2004) 214-224
9. McCarthy Paul. Forensic analysis of mobile phones. Master's thesis, University of South Africa. http://esm.cis.unisa.edu.au/new_esml/resources/publications/forensic%20analysis%20of%20mobile%20phones.pdf; October 2005 [accessed 05.01.08].
10. Micro systemation. XACT system. http://www.msab.com/en/mobile-forensic-products/XACT-mobile-forensic-application/ [accessed 17.12.08]
11. MultiCom. Multicom webshop. http://www.multi-com.pl [accessed 22.12.08]
12. NIST. General test methodology for computer forensic tools. Technical report 1.9 (November 2001), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). http://www.cftt.nist.gov/Test%20Methodology%207.doc [accessed 19.02.08]
13. NIST. GSM mobile device and associated media tool specification. Draft 3 (December 2007), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). http://www.cftt.nist.gov/Mobile_Device_and_Associated_Media_Tool_Requirements_for_GSM_devices.pdf [accessed 19.02.08]
14. Pan Lei, Batten Lynn. Reproducibility of digital evidence in forensic investigations. In: Proceedings of the 2005 digital forensic research workshop; 2005.
15. Sanderson forensics. Pmexplorer. http://www.sandersonforensics.com/content.asp?page=373 [accessed 17.12.08]
16. In: James S.H., and Nordby J.J. (Eds). Forensic science - an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. 2nd ed. (2005), Taylor & Francis
17. The Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE). Proposed standards for the exchange of digital evidence. http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/fsc/backissu/april2000/swgde.htm [accessed 04.06.08]
18. Willassen S. Forensic analysis of mobile phone internal memory. Advances in Digital Forensics 194 (2006) 191-204