Evaluating the efficiency of top liberal arts colleges

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 266-293

  Eckles, James E ^a,b  

^a RHODES COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency; Liberal arts; Peer comparison; Production frontier

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952098297     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-009-9157-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Afonso, A., & Santos, M. (2008). A DEA approach to the relative efficiency of Portuguese public universities. Journal of Portuguese Management Studies, 13(1), 67-87.
2. Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2008). Graduation rates and accountability: Regressions versus production frontiers. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 80-106.
3. Avkiran, N. K. (1999). An application reference for data envelopment analysis in branch banking: Helping the novice researcher. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(5), 206-220.
4. Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1(35), 57-80.
5. Bougnol, M. L., & Dula, J. H. (2006). Validating DEA as a ranking tool: An application of DEA to assess performance in higher education. Annals of Operations Research, 145, 339-365.
6. Bowen, H. R., & Douglass, G. K. (1971). Efficiency in liberal education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Breu, T. M., & Raab, R. L. (1994). Efficiency and perceived quality of the nation's "top 25" national universities and national liberal arts colleges: An application of data envelopment analysis to higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 28(1), 33-46.
8. Capaldi, E. D., Lombardi, J. V., Abbey, C. W., & Craig, D. D. (2008). The top American research universities. The center for measuring university performance. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2, 429-444.
10. Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2. 1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. CEPA working paper 96/08. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Armidale, Australia: University of New England.
11. Coelli, T. (1998). A multi-stage methodology for the solution of orientated DEA Models. Operations Research Letters, 23(3-5), 143-149.
12. Colbert, A., Levary, R. R., & Shaner, M. C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(3), 656-669.
13. Council for Aid to Education. (2008). 2006-2007 institutional report. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.
14. Duc-Le, T. (1987). Estimating the cost of a bachelor's degree: An institutional cost analysis. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
15. Duffy, B. (Ed.). (September 1, 2008). America's best colleges. U. S. News and World Report (special issue).
16. Ferrari, G., & Laureti, T. (2005). Evaluating technical efficiency of human capital formation in the Italian university: Evidence from Florence. Statistical Methods and Applications, 14(2), 243-270.
17. Koshal, R. K., & Koshal, M. (2000). Do liberal arts colleges exhibit economies of scale and scope? Education Economics, 8(3), 209-220.
18. Lindsay, A. W. (1982). Institutional performance in higher education: The efficiency dimension. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 175-199.
19. Massy, W. F. (1990). A paradigm for research on higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education handbook of theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 1-34). New York: Agathon Press.
20. Naitonal Association of College and University Business Officers. (2009). NACUBO home-research-benchmarking resources-data resource details. Retrieved Feb 25, 2009, from http://www. nacubo. org/x8319. xml.
21. National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities. (2008). U-CAN: University and college accountability network-free. Easy. Retrieved Aug 30, 2008, from http://www. ucan-network. org.
22. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). The integrated postsecondary education data system-glossary. Retrieved Aug 30, 2008, from http://www. nces. ed. gov/ipeds/glossary/?charindex=G.
23. National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Detail for land improvements-end of year. Retrieved Aug 30, 2008, from http://nces. ed. gov/IPEDSPAS/showVarDetail. asp?varNumber=60636& surveyYear=06.
24. National Commission on Accountability in Higher Education. (2005). Accountability for better results: A national imperative for higher education. Boulder, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
25. National Survey of Student Engagement. (2007). Experiences that matter: Enhancing student learning and success, annual report 2007. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Bloomington.
26. Pascarella, E., Wolniak, G., Seifert, T., Cruce, T., & Blaich, C. (2005). Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence on impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3).
27. Sarrico, C. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2000). Using DEA for planning in UK universities-an institutional perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(7), 789-800.
28. Seifert, T. A., Goodman, K. M., Linday, N., Jorgensen, J. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., et al. (2008). The effects of liberal arts experiences on liberal arts outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 107-125.
29. Shavelson, R. J., & Huang, L. (2006). Collegiate learning assessment: Conceptual framework. Retrieved Aug 30, 2008, from http://www. cae. org/content/pdf/CLA. ConceptualFramework. pdf.
30. U. S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U. S. higher education. Retrieved Aug 30, 2008, from http://www. ed. gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report. pdf.
31. Winston, G. C., & Yen, I. C. (1995). Costs, prices, subsidies, and aid in U. S. higher education. Discussion paper no. 32. Williamstown, MA: Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education.