Proofs and hypotheses

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 79-86

  Jahnke, Hans Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952094698     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-006-0006-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216-238). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
2. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Boero, P., Mariotti, M. A., P., Ferri, F. & Garuti, R. (1997). 'Approaching geometry theorems in contexts: from history and epistemology to cognition'. In Proceedings of the 21st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Lahti), (Vol. 1, pp. 180-195).
3. Bell, A. (1976). A study of pupils' proof-explanations in mathematical situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics 7, 23-40.
4. Coe, R., & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and constructs of advanced mathematics students. British Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 41-53.
5. Duhem, P. (1978). Ziel und Struktur der physikalischen Theorien. Reprint of the first German edition 1908: Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
6. Einstein, A. (1921). Geometrie und Erfahrung. Sitzungsberichte der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (1. Halbband), 123-130.
7. Fishbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 9-24.
8. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.
9. Hanna, G. (1989). Proofs that prove and proofs that explain. In Proceedings of the thirteenth conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics Education (Vol. II, pp. 45-51). Paris: PME.
10. Hanna, G., & Jahnke, H.N. (1996). Proof and proving. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-908). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Hanna, G., & Jahnke, H. N. (2002). Arguments from Physics in Mathematical Proofs: an Educational Perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22, 38-45.
12. Harel, G. & L. Sowder (1998). Students'proof and schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (Eds.) Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
13. Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2007). Curriculum change and geometrical reasoning. In P. Boero (Ed.), The concept of mathematical proof (to appear).
14. Herget, W. & Torres-Skoumal, M. (2007). Picture (Im)Perfect Mathematics! In W. Blum et al. (Eds.), Applications and Modelling in Mathematics Education. New ICMI Studies Series no. 10. New York: Springer (to appear).
15. Jahnke, H. N. (1978). Zum Verhä ltnis von Wissensentwicklung und Begründung in der Mathematik-Beweisen als didaktisches Problem. Bielefeld: Universitä t Bielefeld.
16. Jahnke, H. N. (2005). A genetic approach to proof. A genetic approach to proof. In M. Bosch (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME IV), (pp. 428-437). Sant Feliu de Guíxols.
17. Kirsch, A. (1979). Beispiele für prämathematische Beweise. In W. Dörfler & R. Fischer (Eds.), Beweisen im Mathematikunterricht (pp. 261-274). Klagenfurt: Hölder-Pichler-Temspsky.
18. Steiner, H.G. (1968). Examples of exercises in mathematization on the Secondary School Level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1/2), 181-201.
19. Wittmann, E.C., & Müller, G. (1988). Wann ist ein Beweis ein Beweis. In: P. Bender (Ed.), Mathematikdidaktik: Theorie und Praxis. Festschrift für Heinrich Winter (pp. 237-257). Berlin: Cornelsen.