Effect of parathion-methyl on amazonian fish and freshwater invertebrates: A comparison of sensitivity with temperate data

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 765-771

  Rico, Andreu ^a   Geber Corrêa, Rachel ^b   Campos, Paola S ^b   Garcia, Marcos V B ^c   Waichman, Andrea V ^b   Van Den Brink, Paul J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^c EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARATHION METHYL;

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; ENDEMIC SPECIES; FISH; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; INSECTICIDE; INVERTEBRATE; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; POLLUTION EFFECT; TOXICITY;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FISH; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; FRESHWATER SPECIES; LC 50; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ACUTE TOXICITY TESTS; ANIMALS; BRAZIL; FISHES; FRESH WATER; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INSECTICIDES; INVERTEBRATES; LETHAL DOSE 50; METHYL PARATHION; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

AMAZONIA;

ARTHROPODA; INVERTEBRATA;

EID: 77952093263     PISSN: 00904341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-009-9409-5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. T Aldenberg JS Jaworska 2000 Uncertainty of hazardous concentrations and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 46 1 18 10.1006/eesa.1999.1869 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXjtVWktL0%3D (Pubitemid 30331813)
2. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) (2001) Toxicological profile for methyl parathion. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA
3. LE Castillo E De la Cruz C Ruepert 1997 Ecotoxicology and pesticides in tropical aquatic ecosystems of Central America Environ Toxicol Chem 16 41 51 10.1002/etc.5620160104 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmtl2msw%3D%3D
4. MA Daam SJH Crum PJ Van den Brink AJA Nogueira 2008 Fate and effects of the insecticide chlorpyrifos in outdoor plankton-dominated microcosms in Thailand Environ Toxicol Chem 27 2530 2538 10.1897/07-628.1 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1cXhsVaiur%2FK
5. MA Daam K Satapornvanit PJ Van den Brink AJA Nogueira 2009 Sensitivity of macroinvertebrates to carbendazim under semi-field conditions in Thailand: implications for the use of temperate toxicity data in a tropical risk assessment of fungicides Chemosphere 74 1187 1194 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11. 040 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXitVygsb4%3D
6. De Zwart D (2002) Observed regularities in species sensitivity distributions for aquatic species. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWI, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 133-154
7. SD Dyer SE Belanger GJ Carr 1997 An initial evaluation of the use of Euro/North American fish species for tropical effects assessments Chemosphere 35 2767 2781 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00273-7 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXntFOit7o%3D (Pubitemid 27494283)
8. W Henriques RD Jeffers TE Lacher Jr RJ Kendall 1997 Agrochemical use on banana plantations in Latin America: perspectives on ecological risk Environ Toxicol Chem 16 1 91 99 10.1002/etc.5620160110
9. KWH Kwok KMY Leung GSG Lui VKH Chu PKS Lam D Morritt L Maltby TCM Brock PJ Van den Brink MStJ Warne M Crane 2007 Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species' acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors Integr Environ Assess Manage 3 49 67 10.1002/ieam.5630030105 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhvFyqs7c%3D
10. TE Lacher Jr MI Goldstein 1997 Tropical ecotoxicology: status and needs Environ Toxicol Chem 16 100 111 10.1002/etc.5620160111 1:CAS:528: DyaK2sXmtl2mug%3D%3D
11. L Maltby N Blake TCM Brock PJ Van den Brink 2005 Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: the importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems Environ Toxicol Chem 24 379 388 10.1897/04-025R.1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXivVGntrw%3D (Pubitemid 40128345)
12. MC Newman DR Ownby LCA Mezin DC Powell 2000 Applying species sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: assumptions of distribution type and sufficient number of species Environ Toxicol Chem 19 2 508 515 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhsF2hsbw%3D
13. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1992) Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment. OECD Environment Monograph 92. Environment Directorate, OECD, Paris
14. PAN (Pesticide Action Network) (2009) Pesticide database. http://www.pesticideinfo.org. Accessed June 2009
15. EC Peters NJ Gassman JC Firman RH Richmond EA Power 1997 Ecotoxicology of tropical marine ecosystems Environ Toxicol Chem 16 12 40 10.1002/etc.5620160103 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXmtl2msg%3D%3D
16. Posthuma L, Suter GW II, Traas TP (2002) Species-sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL
17. J Römbke AV Waichman MVB Garcia 2008 Risk assessment of pesticides for soils of the Central Amazon, Brazil: comparing outcomes with temperate and tropical data Integr Environ Assess Manage 4 1 94 104 10.1897/IEAM-2007-052.1
18. AFW Schroer D Belgers TCM Brock AM Matser SJ Maund PJ Van den Brink 2004 Comparison of laboratory single species and field population-level effects of the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin on freshwater invertebrates Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 46 324 335 10.1007/s00244-003-2315-3 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2cXjtFKit7s%3D
19. R Schulz MT Moore ER Bennet JL Farris S Smith Jr CM Cooper 2003 Methyl parathion toxicity in vegetated and non vegetated wetland mesocosms Environ Toxicol Chem 22 6 1262 1268 10.1002/etc.5620220611 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXnsVGhu7Y%3D
20. SYSTAT (2007) SYSTAT software. SYSTAT Inc., Chicago
21. ToxRat (Toxicity Response Analysis and Testing) (2003) ToxRat Solutions GmbH. Aachen, Germany
22. Van Vlaardingen PLA, Traas TP, Wintersen AM, Aldenberg T (2004) ETX 2.0. A program to calculate hazardous concentrations and fraction affected, based on normality distributed toxicity data. Report No. 601501028/2004. RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
23. RPA Van Wijngaarden TCM Brock PJ Van den Brink 2005 Threshold levels for effects of insecticides in freshwater ecosystems: a review Ecotoxicology 14 355 380 10.1007/s10646-004-6371-x (Pubitemid 40576939)
24. DJ Versteeg SE Belanger GJ Carr 1999 Understanding single-species and model ecosystem sensitivity: data-based comparison Environ Toxicol Chem 6 1329 1346
25. AV Waichman J Römbke MOA Ribeiro NCS Nina 2002 Use and fate of pesticides in the Amazon state, Brazil: risk to human health and the environment Environ Sci Pollut Res 9 423 428 10.1007/BF02987596
26. AV Waichman E Eve NCS Nina 2007 Do farmers understand the information displayed on pesticide product labels? A key question to reduce pesticides exposure and risk of poisoning in the Brazilian Amazon Crop Protect 26 576 583 10.1016/j.cropro.2006.05.011 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVCjt7s%3D (Pubitemid 46136674)
27. JR Wheeler EPM Grist KMY Leung D Morritt M Crane 2002 Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice Marine Pollut Bull 45 192 202 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00327-7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xms1Kisrc%3D
28. WHO (World Health Organization) (2004) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification. WHO, Geneva