Understanding and using near-misses properties through a double-step conceptual structure

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 237-247

  Cavalieri, S ^a   Ghislandi, W M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Behaviour; Error detection; Feedback systems; Near miss; Safety; Set theory

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; DOUBLE-STEP; EXPLICIT MODELS; FEEDBACK SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES; MAJOR ACCIDENTS; MANAGERIAL PRACTICES; MODEL-BASED;

ACCIDENTS; SET THEORY;

ERROR DETECTION;

EID: 77952091046     PISSN: 09565515     EISSN: 15728145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-008-0193-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Adams E.E. (1995) Total quality safety management. An introduction. American Society of Safety Engineers, Des Plaines
2. M.P. Barroso J.R. Wilson 2000 Human error and disturbance occurrence in manufacturing systems (HEDOMS): A framework and a toolkit for practical analysis Cognition Technology & Work 2 51 61 10.1007/s101110050027
3. Baselga A. (1984) Seguridad en el Trabajo. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo, Madrid
4. V.M. Bier W. Yi 1995 The performance of precursor-based estimators for rare event frequencies Reliability Engineering and System Safety 50 241 251 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00097-6
5. Bird F.E., Germain G.L. (1966) Damage control. American Management Assoc. Inc, New York
6. Bird F.E., Germain G.L. (1996) Practical loss control leadership. Det Norske Veritas, Loganville
7. A. Cantarella 1997 Incident investigation: Critical to the safety effort Professional Safety 42 10
8. Heinrich H.W. (1931) Industrial accident prevention. McGraw-Hill, New York
9. S. Jones C. Kirchsteiger W. Bjerke 1999 The importance of near-miss reporting to further improve safety performance Journal of Loss Prevention in the process industries 12 59 67 10.1016/S0950-4230(98)00038-2
10. Kletz T. (2001) An engineer's view of human error. IChemE, Rugby
11. J.E. Labelle 2000 What do accidents truly cost? Professional Safety 45 38 42
12. B. Lake 1998 Accidentally on purpose Risk and Insurance 9 43 44
13. Luthans F., Kreitner R. (1985) Organizational behavior modification and beyond. Scott Foresman, Glenview
14. L.M. Morrison 2004 Best practices in incident investigation in the chemical process industry with examples from the industry sector and specifically from Nova Chemicals Journal of Hazardous Materials 111 161 166 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.051 (Pubitemid 38844553)
15. National Safety Council. (2001) Accident prevention manual. National Safety Council, Itasca
16. Rasmussen J. (1976) Outlines of a hybrid model of the process operator. In: Sheridan T.B., Johannsen G. (eds) Monitoring behaviour and supervisory control. Plenum Press, New York
17. Reason J.T. (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Reason J.T. (1991) Too little and too late. In: Schaaf T.W., Lucas D.A., Hale A.R. (eds) Near-miss reporting as a safety tool. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
19. M.A.M. Saldaña S.G. Herrero M.A.M. del Campo D.O. Ritzel 2003 Assessing definitions and concepts within the safety profession The International Electronic Journal of Health Education 6 1 9
20. Seveso II. (1997). Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major accident hazard involving dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 10 13, Luxembourg.
21. Sutherland V.J., Makin P.J., Cox C.J. (2000) The management of safety. SAGE Publications, London
22. Tye J. (1976) Accident ratio study. British Safety Council, London
23. van der Schaaf, T. W. (1992). Near-miss reporting in the chemical process industry. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindoven.
24. T.W. van der Schaaf 1995 Near-miss reporting in the chemical process industry: An overview Microelectronic Reliability 35 1233 1243 10.1016/0026-2714(95)99374-R
25. L. Wright T.W. van der Schaaf 2004 Accident versus near miss causation: A critical review of the literature, an empirical test in the UK railway domain, and their implications for other sectors Journal of Hazardous Materials 111 105 110 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.049 (Pubitemid 38844545)