Karl Mannheim's "problem of Generations" - 80 years after;Karl mannheims "problem der generationen" - 80 jahre danach forum

Zeitschrift fur Familienforschung

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 203-221

  Becker, Henk A ^a  

^a NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cohort generations; Generational research in family research; Partial generations; Specific generations; Typological generations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952073783     PISSN: 14372940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Amato, P. R. & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Armitage, P., Berry, G. & Matthews, J. N. S. (2002). Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Attias-Donfut, C. (1988). Sociologie des générations: l'empreinte du temps. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
4. Baker, K. L., Dalton R. J. & Hildebrandt, K. (1981). Germany transformed. Political culture and the new politics. London: Harvard University Press.
5. Baltes, P. B. & Mayer, K. U. (1999). The Berlin Aging Study, Aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Barry, B. (1989). Theories of justice. London: Harvester - Wheatsheaf.
7. Becker, H. A. (1992). Generaties en hun Kansen. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
8. Becker, H. A. (1998). Generationen in West- und Ostdeutschland nach der Vereinigung. In H. Meulemann, ( Hrsg.), Werte und nationale Identität im vereinten Deutschland. Erklärungsansätze der Umfrageforschung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 285-290.
9. Becker, H. A. (2000a). Sociological research on discontinuous change. In: G.C. Kinloch, & R. P. Mohan, (Eds), Ideology and the social sciences. Westport: Greenwood Press, pp. 153-184).
10. Becker, H. A. (2000b). Discontinuous change and generational contracts. In: S. Arber & C. Attias-Donfut. (Eds), The myth of generational conflict, The family and state in ageing societies, London: Routledge, pp. 114-132.
11. Becker, H. A. (2008). Generations in European science and society. In: H. A. Becker & J. J. F. Schroots, (Eds), The research potentials of senior scientists and scholars. Utrecht: IGITUR, pp. 41-73.
12. Becker, H. A. & Sanders, K. (2006). Innovations in meta-analysis and social impact analysis relevant for tech mining. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, pp. 966-980.
13. Becker, R. ( Hrsg.) (1997). Generationen und sozialer Wandel: Generationsdynamik, Generationenbeziehungen und Differenzierung von Generationen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
14. Bertram, H. (1992) (Hrsg.). Die Familie in den neuen Bundesländern: Stabilität und Wandel in der gesellschaftlichen Umbruchsituation. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
15. Blossfeld, H. P. & Nuthmann, R. (1991). Transition from youth to adulthood as a cohort process in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: H-A: Becker (Ed.), Life histories and generations. Utrecht: ISOR, pp. 183-217.
16. Blossfeld, H. P. & Hamerle, A. (1991). Advantages of event history analysis for life course research. .In: H. A. Becker (Ed.), Life histories and generations. Utrecht: ISOR, pp. 519-546.
17. Blossfeld, H. P. & Prein, G. (1998) (Eds). Rational choice theory and large-scale data analysis. Colorado: Westview Press.
18. Blossfeld, H. P., Hamerle, A. & Mayer K. U. (1986). Ereignisanalyse: Statistische Theorie und Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
19. Bontekoning, A. C. (2007). Generaties in Organisaties. Ridderkerk: Labyrint.
20. Braungart, R. G. & Braungart M. M. (1993). Life course and generational politics. Lanham: University Press of America.
21. Ciroth, A. & Becker H.A. (2006). Validation - The missing link in life cycle assessment. Towards pragmatic LCAs. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, 5, pp. 295-297.
22. Coupland, D. C. (1991). Generation X: Tales for an accelerated culture. New York: ABC Press.
23. Courgeau, D. & Lelièvre E. (1992). Event history analysis in demography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24. Danieli, Y. (1998) (Ed.). International handbook of multigenerational legacies of trauma. New York: Plenum Press.
25. De Waard, F. (2000). Over Tweelingen gesproken. Soesterberg: Aspekt.
26. Diepstraten I., Ester P. & Vinken H. (1999). Talkin 'bout my generation. Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences, 35, 2, pp. 91-109.
27. Docampo Rama, M. (2001). Technology generations handling complex user interfaces. Maastricht: Shaker.
28. Dykstra P. A. (2006: De toekomst van de familiesociologie in Nederland. In: G. Engbersen & J. de Haan (Hrsg). Balans en Toekomst van de Sociologie. Amsterdam: Pallas, S. 224-238.
29. Felling,A., Peters J. & Schreuder O. (1983). Burgerlijk en onburgerlijk Nederland, een national onderzoek naar waardenoriëntaties op de drempel van de jaren tachtig. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
30. Fogt, H. (1982). Politische Generationen: Empirische Bedeutung und theoretisches Modell. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
31. Freeman, S. (2003) (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Halman, L., Luijkx R., & Van Zundert M. (2005) Atlas of European values, Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
33. Herrmann, U. (2006). Was ist eine "Generation"? Methodologische und begriffsgeschichtliche Explorationen zu einem Idealtypus. In: A. Schüle., T. Ahbe & R. Gries (Hrsg.), Die DDR aus generationengeschichtlicher Perspektive, Eine Inventur. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
34. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton: University Press.
35. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. Inglehart, R. & Abramson P. R. (1993). Affluence and intergenerational change: Period effects and birth cohort effects. In: H. A. Becker & P. L. J. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 71-114.
37. Iwema, J., Becker H. A. & Sanders K. (1997). Transitions into independence. A comparison of cohorts born since 1930 in The Netherlands. European Sociological Review, Vol. 13, 2, pp. 117-137. (Pubitemid 127374156)
38. Koch, A. (1993). An economic analysis of marital dissolution in West Germany. In: H. A. Becker & P. L. J. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 583-602.
39. Kohli, M. & Szydlik M. (2000). Einleitung. In: M. Kohli & M. Szydlik (Hrsg.), Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 7-18.
40. Kohli, M. (2007). Familienpolitik als Lebenslauf- und Generationenpolitik. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg. 36, Heft 5, S. 396-400.
41. Kohli, M. & Künemund, H. (2000) (Hrsg.), Die zweite Lebenshälfte - Ergebnisse des Alters- Surveys. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
42. Laslett, P. & Fishkin J. S. (1992) (Eds). Justice between age groups and generations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43. Littwin, S. (1986). The postponed generation, Why youth are growing up later. New York: William Morrow.
44. Lutz, W. (1991) (Ed.). Future demographic trends in Europe and North America, What can we assume today? London: Academic Press.
45. Mannheim, K. (1928/1929) Das Problem der Generationen. Kölner Vierteljahreshefte für Soziologie, 7 (1928), S. 157-185
46. Kölner Vierteljahreshefte für Soziologie, und (1929), S. 309-330.
47. Matthes, J. (1985) Karl Mannheims "Problem der Generationen" neu gelesen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14, S. 363-372.
48. Mayer, K. U. (1994). The postponed generation: Economic, political, social and cultural determinants of changes in life course regimes. In: H. A. Becker & P. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations. Utrecht: ISOR, pp. 47-63.
49. Meulemann, H. (1993). The social and personal costs of prolonged study. In: H. A. Becker & P. L. J. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 425-436.
50. Moed, H. E., Glänzel, W. & Schmoch, U. (2004) (Eds). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T Systems. London: Kluwer.
51. Nickel, B. & Schmidt, P. (1993). Child or career? Determining influences on East- and West- German juveniles' intention to decide for an abortion. In: H. A. Becker & P. L. J. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 643-656.
52. Niethammer, L. (2006). Generation und Geist. Eine Station auf Karl Mannheims Weg zur Wissenssoziologie. In: A. Schüle, T. Ahbe & R. Gries (Hrsg.): Die DDR aus generationengeschichtlicher Perspektive. Eine Inventur. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, S. 47-65.
53. Norris P. & Inglehart R. (2004). Sacred and secular. Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Opp, K. D., Voss P. & Gern, C. (1995). Origins of a spontaneous revolution. East Germany in 1989. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
55. Pinder, W. (1926). Das Problem der Generationen in der Kunstgeschichte Europas. Berlin: Frankfurter Verlags-Anstalt.
56. Ravelli, A. C. J. (1999). Prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine and glucose tolerance and obesity at age 50. Amsterdam: Thesis.
57. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Reich, C. A., (1970). The greening of America. New York: Bantam.
59. Remmling, G. W. (1975). The sociology of Karl Mannheim. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
60. Roof, W. C. (1993). A generation of seekers, the spiritual journeys of the baby boom generation. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
61. Rothman K. S., Greenland S. & Lash T. (2008 (Eds). Modern epidemiology. London: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
62. Saint-Étienne, C. (1993). Génération Sacrificiée, les 20-45 ans. Paris: Plon.
63. Sanders, K. & Becker, H. A. (1994): The transition from education to work and social independence: A comparison between the United States, The Netherlands, West Germany, and the United Kingdom. European Sociological Review, Vol. 10, No 2, pp. 135-154.
64. Schelsky, H. (1957): Die Skeptische Generation. Frankfurt: Ullstein.
65. Schroots, J. J. F. (2008). The Janus model of life-course dynamics. Utrecht: IGITUR.
66. Van de Goor, A. G. & Becker H. A. (2000). Technology generations in The Netherlands, A sociological analysis. Maastricht: Shaker.
67. Verhoeven, W. Jansen, W. & Dessens, J. (2005). Income attainment during transformation processes, A meta-analysis of the market transition theory. European Sociological Review, Volume 21, No. 3, pp. 201-226.
68. Weymann, A. (2000). Sozaler Wandel, Generationsverhältnisse und Technikgenerationen. In: M. Kohli. & M. Szydlik (Hrsg.), Generationen in Familie und Gesellschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, S. 36-58.
69. Weymann, A. & Sackmann, R. (1993). Modernization and the generational structure: Technological innovation and technology generations in East and West Germany. In: H. A. Becker & P. L. J. Hermkens (Eds), Solidarity of generations: Demographic, economic and social change, and its consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, pp. 721-744.
70. Woldring, H. E. S. (1986). Karl Mannheim. The development of his thought. Assen: Van Gorkum.
71. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.