Rank aggregation methods

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 555-570

  Lin, Shili ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS; BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS; BIOLOGICAL STUDIES; CLASS OF METHODS; GENE EXPRESSION MICROARRAY; INTERNET SEARCH ENGINE; MARKOV CHAIN; META-ANALYSIS; RANK AGGREGATION; REALISTIC SCENARIO; STATIONARY DISTRIBUTION; STOCHASTIC SEARCH; STOCHASTIC SEARCH ALGORITHMS; STOCHASTIC SEARCH METHODS;

GENE EXPRESSION; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ION BEAMS; MARKOV PROCESSES; SEARCH ENGINES; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

HEURISTIC METHODS;

EID: 77952064123     PISSN: 19395108     EISSN: 19390068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wics.111     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Conlon EM, Song JJ, Liu A. Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8: 80.
2. DeConde RP, Hawley S, Falcon S, Clegg N, Knudsen B, Etzioni R. Combining results of microarray experiments: a rank aggregation approach. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2006, 5: 15.
3. Fishel I, Kaufman A, Ruppin E. Meta-analysis of gene expression data: a predictor-based approach. Bioinformatics 2007, 23: 1599-1606.
4. Hall P, Schimek MG. Inference for the top-k rank list problem, Technical Report; 2009.
5. Lin S, Ding J. Integration of ranked lists via cross entropy Monte Carlo with applications to mRNA and microRNA studies. Biometrics 2009, 65: 9-18.
6. Liu HC, Chen CY, Liu YT, Chu CB, Liang DC, Shih LY, Lin CJ. Cross-generation and cross-laboratory predictions of Affymetrix microarrays by rank-based methods. J Biomed Inform 2008, 41: 570-579.
7. Tan AC, Naiman DQ, Xu L, Winslow RL, Geman D. Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 3896-3904.
8. Yuen T, Wurmbach E, Pfeffer RL, Ebersole BJ, Sealfon SC. Accuracy and calibration of commercial oligonucleotide and custom cDNA microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30: e48.
9. Choi JK, Yu U, Kim S, Yo OJ. Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics 2003, 19: i84-i90.
10. Xu L, Tan AC, Naiman DQ, Geman D, Winslow RL. Robust cancer marker genes emerge from direct integration of inter-study microarray data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21: 3905-3911.
11. Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 1927, 34: 273-286.
12. Dwork C, Kumar R, Naor M, Sivakumar D. Rank aggregation methods for the web. In: Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, New York; 2001, 613-622.
13. Thurstone LL. Rank order as a psychophysical method. J Exp Psychol 1931, 14: 187-201.
14. Thurstone LL. The Measurements of Values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1959.
15. Thurstone LL, Jones LV. The rational origin for measuring subjective values. J Am Stat Assoc 1957, 52: 458-471.
16. Bock RD, Jones LV. The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and Choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day; 1968.
17. Green PE, Tull DS. Research for Marketing Decisions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1978.
18. Conklin M, Lipovetsky S. Efficient assessment of self-explicated importance using latent class Thurstone scaling. In: The 10th Annual Advanced Research Techniques Forum. Santa Fe, New Mexico: American Marketing Association; 1999.
19. Mosteller F. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. Psychometrika 1951, 16: 203-218.
20. Daniels HE. Rank correlation and population models. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1950, 12: 171-181.
21. Glenn WA, David HA. Ties in paired-comparisons experiments using a modified Thurstone-Mosteller model. Biometrics 1960, 16: 86-109.
22. David HA. The Method of Paired Comparisons. 2nd ed. London: Griffin; 1988.
23. Stern H. Models for distributions on permutations. J Am Stat Assoc 1990, 85: 558-564.
24. Ennis DM, Johnson NL. Thurstone-Shepard similarity models as special cases of moment generating functions. Math Psychol 1993, 37: 104-110.
25. Maydeu-Olivares A. Thursonian modeling of ranking data via mean and covariance structure analysis. Psychometrika 1999, 64: 325-340.
26. Maydeu-Olivares A, Bockenholt U. Structural equation modeling of paired comparison and ranking data. Psychol Methods 2005, 10: 285-304.
27. Borda JC. Memoire sur les elections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Academie des Sciences; 1781.
28. Emerson P. Designing an All-Inclusive Democracy. Part 1: Collective Decision-making: The Modified Borda Count, MBC. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2007, 15-38. ISBN 978-3-540-33163-6 (Print) 978-3-540-33164-3 (Online).
29. Saari DG. Chaotic Elections! A Mathematician Looks at Voting. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 2001.
30. Young HP. Condorcet's theory of voting. Am Polit Sci Rev 1988, 82: 1231-1244.
31. Marden JI. Analyzing and modeling rank data. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 64. London: Chapman & Hall; 1995.
32. Kendall M. Rank Correlation Methods. 4th ed. London: Griffin; 1970.
33. Diaconis P, Graham RL. Spearman's footrule as a measure of disarray. J R Stat Soc B 1977, 39: 262-268.
34. Fagin R, Kumar R, Sivakumar D. Comparing top k lists. SIAM J Disc Math 2003, 17: 134-160.
35. Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP. The Cross-Entropy Method. A Unified Approach to Combinatorial Optimization, Monte-Carlo Simulation and Machine Learning. UK: Springer; 2004.
36. Margolin L. On the convergence of the cross-entropy method. Ann Oper Res 2005, 134: 201-214.
37. Liu Z, Lin S, Tan M. Genome-wide tagging SNPs with entropy-based Monte Carlo methods. J Comput Biol 2006, 13: 1606-1614.
38. Dhanasekaran SM, Barrette TR, Ghosh D, Shah R, Varambally S, Kurachi K, Pienta KJ, Rubin MS, Chinnaiyan AM. Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 2001, 412: 822-826.
39. Luo J, Duggan DJ, Chen Y, Sauvageot J, Ewing M, Bittner ML, Trent JM, Isaacs WB. Human prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: molecular dissection by gene expression profiling. Cancer Res 2001, 61: 4683-4688.
40. Singh D, Febbo PG, Ross K, Jackson DG, Manola J, Ladd C, Tamayo P, Renshaw AA, Amico AV, Richie JP, et al. Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior. Cancer Cell 2002, 1: 203-209.
41. True L, Coleman I, Hawley S, Huang A, Gifford D, Coleman R, Beer T, Gelman E, Datta M, Mostaghel E, et al. A molecular correlate to the gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 10991-10996.
42. Welsh JB, Sapinoso LM, Su AI, Kern SG, Wang-Rodriguez J, Moskaluk CA, Frierson HF Jr., Hampton GM. Analysis of gene expression identifies candidate markers and pharmacological targets in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2001, 61: 5974-5978.
43. McLachlan G, Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.