Relationship between feeding strategy, lying behavior patterns, and incidence of intramammary infection in dairy cows

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 93, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1987-1997

  DeVries, T J ^a   Dufour, S ^b   Scholl, D T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dairy cow; Feeding strategy; Intramammary infection; Lying behavior

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BOVINE MASTITIS; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; INCIDENCE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; TIME; BOVINAE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; PROCEDURES; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CATTLE; DAIRYING; FEEDING METHODS; FEMALE; INCIDENCE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

BOS;

EID: 77952062987     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2692     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barkema H.W., Van Der Ploeg J.D., Schukken Y.N., Lam T.J.G.M., Benedictus G., Brand A. Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and incidence rate of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:1655-1663.
2. Barnouin J., Chassagne M., Bazin S., Boichard D. Management practices from questionnaire surveys in herds with very low somatic cell score through a national mastitis program in France. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87:3989-3999.
3. Broll S., Glaser S., Kreienbrock L. Calculating sample size bounds for logistic regression. Prev. Vet. Med. 2002, 54:105-111.
4. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals 1993, Vol. 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
5. Cook N.B., Reinemann D. A toolbox for assessing cow, udder and teat hygiene. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council 2007, 31-43.
6. DeVries T.J., Beauchemin K.A., Dohme F., Schwartzkopf-Genswein K.S. Repeated ruminal acidosis challenges in lactating dairy cows at high and low risk for developing acidosis: Feeding, ruminating, and lying behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5067-5078.
7. DeVries T.J., Beauchemin K.A., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Dietary forage concentration affects the feed sorting behavior of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:5572-5579.
8. DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G. Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and lying patterns of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:625-631.
9. DeVries T.J., von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Beauchemin K.A. Frequency of feed delivery affects the behavior of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88:3553-3562.
10. Dohoo I., Martin W., Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research 2003, AVC Inc., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
11. Dufour S., Dohoo I., DeVries T., Scholl D. Improving mastitis control programs through identification of risk factors related to the incidence of subclinical intramammary infections in mastitis control-From science to practice. Of the Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Mastitis Control 2008, 211-218.
12. Dufour, S., H. W. Barkema, L. DesCôteaux, T. J. DeVries, I. R. Dohoo, K. Reyher, J.-P. Roy, and D. T. Scholl. 2010. Development and validation of a bilingual questionnaire for measuring udder health related management practices on dairy farms. Prev. Vet. Med. (accepted.).
13. Fregonesi J.A., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M. Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:3349-3354.
14. Harmon R.J., Eberhart R.J., Jasper D.E., Langlois B.E. Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection 1990, National Mastitis Council, Arlington, VA.
15. Hogan J.S., Gonzalez R.N., Harmon S.C., Nickerson S.P., Oliver J.W., Pankey J.W., Smith K.L. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis 1999, NMC Inc., Madison, WI. Revised ed.
16. Johansson B., Redbo I., Svennersten-Sjaunja K. Effect of feeding before, during and after milking on dairy cow behaviour and the hormone coritsol. Anim. Sci. 1999, 68:597-604.
17. McDonald J.S. Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: Changes between milking periods. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1975, 36:1241-1242.
18. Neijenhuis F., Barkema H.W., Hogeveen H., Noordhuizen J. Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2795-2804.
19. Neijenhuis F., Klungel G.H., Hogeveen H. Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84:2599-2606.
20. Olde Riekerink R.G.M., Barkema H.W., Kelton D.F., Scholl D.T. Incidence rate of clinical mastitis on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:1366-1377.
21. Peeler E.J., Green M.J., Fitzpatrick J.L., Morgan K.L., Green L.E. Risk factors associated with clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2000, 83:2464-2472.
22. Reyher K., Dufour S., Du Tremblay D., Barkema H., DesCôteaux L., DeVries T.J., Dohoo I.R., Roy J.-P., Scholl D.T. The National Cohort of Dairy Farms-A research platform for mastitis management, planning and control in Canada. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, Charlotte, NC 2009, 134-135.
23. Schultz T.A. Feeding affects post-milking cow activities. Calif. Agric. 1985, 39:29-30.
24. Schultze W.D., Bright S.C. Changes in penetrability of bovine papillary duct to endotoxin after milking. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1983, 44:2373-2375.
25. Shook G.E. Genetic improvement of mastitis through selection on somatic cell count. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 1993, 9:563-581.
26. Tyler J.W., Fox L.K., Parish S.M., Swain J., Johnson D.L., Grasseschi H.A., Gant R. Effect of feed availability on post-milking standing time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Res. 1997, 64:617-620.