Field assessment of photosynthetic characteristics in micropropagated and grafted wych elm (Ulmus glabra Huds.) trees

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 221-228

  Ďurkovič, Jaroslav ^a   Čaňová, Ingrid ^a   Priwitzer, Tibor ^b   Biroščíková, Mária ^c   Kapraľ, Pavol ^c   Saniga, Milan ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN ZVOLEN   (Slovakia)

^b FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Slovakia)

^c Lesy SR Forest Nursery Centre ari   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; CO2 assimilation rate; Leaf gas exchange; Micropropagation

Indexed keywords

ASSIMILATION RATE; CHLOROPHYLL A FLUORESCENCE; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; DIAMETER-AT-BREAST HEIGHTS; FIELD ASSESSMENT; FIELD TEST; FLUORESCENCE RATIO; GROWING SEASON; GROWTH PATTERNS; LEAF GAS EXCHANGE; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MICROPROPAGATION; PHOTOCHEMICAL EFFICIENCY; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CHARACTERISTICS; PHOTOSYNTHETIC PHOTON FLUX DENSITIES; PHOTOSYSTEM II; SPECIFIC LEAF AREA; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRANSPIRATION RATES;

CHLOROPHYLL; FLUORESCENCE; FORESTRY; GAS ABSORPTION; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PORPHYRINS; TISSUE CULTURE;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ABSORPTION; ASSIMILATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHLOROPHYLLS; FLUORESCENCE; FORESTRY; GAS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANTS; PROPAGATION; TISSUE CULTURE;

ULMUS; ULMUS GLABRA;

EID: 77952010137     PISSN: 01676857     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9680-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Becwar MR, Pullman GS (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). In: Jain SM, Gupta PK (eds) Somatic embryogenesis in woody plants, vol 3. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 287-301.
2. Ben Jouira H, Hassairi A, Bigot C, Dorion N (1998) Adventitious shoot production from strips of stem in the Dutch elm hybrid 'Commelin': plantlet regeneration and neomycin sensitivity. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 53: 153-160.
3. Benowicz A, Grossnickle SC, El-Kassaby YA (2002) Field assessment of Douglas-fir somatic and zygotic seedlings with respect to gas exchange, water relations, and frost hardiness. Can J Forest Res 32: 1822-1828.
4. Biroščíková M, Spišáková K, Lipták Š, Pichler V, Ďurkovič J (2004) Micropropagation of mature wych elm (Ulmus glabra Huds.). Plant Cell Rep 22: 640-644.
5. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf HR, Long SP, Baker NR, Öquist G, Schreiber U, Lechner EG (1989) Chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe of the photosynthetic competence of leaves in the field: a review of current instrumentation. Funct Ecol 3: 497-514.
6. Brasier C (1991) Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115: 151-161.
7. Cicák A (1998) Knowledge of leaf area distribution in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) spring shoots and possibility of its application in production ecology. Lesnictví-Forestry 44: 250-255.
8. Conde P, Loureiro J, Santos C (2004) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of Ulmus minor Mill. Plant Cell Rep 22: 632-639.
9. Conde P, Sousa A, Costa A, Santos C (2008) A protocol for Ulmus minor Mill micropropagation and acclimatization. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 92: 113-119.
10. Corchete MP, Diez JJ, Valle T (1993) Micropropagation of Ulmus pumila L. from mature trees. Plant Cell Rep 12: 534-536.
11. Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Ballester A (2002) Somatic embryogenesis in elm. Ann Bot 89: 637-644.
12. Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Ballester A (2003) Proliferation and maintenance of embryogenic capacity in elm embryogenic cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39: 394-401.
13. Fenning TM, Gartland KMA, Brasier CM (1993) Micropropagation and regeneration of English elm, Ulmus procera Salisbury. J Exp Bot 44: 1211-1217.
14. Gautheret RJ (1940) Nouvelles recherches sur le bouregeonnement du tissue cambial d'Ulmus campestris cultivé in vitro. CR Acad Sci 210: 744-746.
15. George MW, Tripepi RR (1994) Cytokinins, donor plants and time in culture affect shoot regenerative capacity of American elm leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39: 27-36.
16. Grossnickle SC, Major JE (1994a) Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. II. Stock quality assessment prior to field planting. Can J Forest Res 24: 1385-1396.
17. Grossnickle SC, Major JE (1994b) Interior spruce seedlings compared with emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. III. Physiological response and morphological development on a reforestation site. Can J Forest Res 24: 1397-1407.
18. Hammatt N (1999) Delayed flowering and reduced branching in micropropagated mature wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) compared with rooted cuttings and seedlings. Plant Cell Rep 18: 478-484.
19. Harvengt L, Meier-Dinkel A, Dumas E, Collin E (2004) Establishment of a cryopreserved gene bank of European elms. Can J Forest Res 34: 43-55.
20. Kapaun JA, Cheng Z-M (1997) Plant regeneration from leaf tissues of Siberian elm. HortScience 32: 301-303.
21. Krajňáková J, Longauer R (1996) Culture initiation, multiplication and identification of in vitro regenerants of resistant hybrid elms. Lesnictví-Forestry 42: 261-270.
22. Lloyd GB, McCown BH (1980) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 30: 421-427.
23. Malá J (2000) Micropropagation of mature elm trees in vitro. J Forest Sci 46: 260-264.
24. Malá J, Cvikrová M, Chalupa V (2007) Micropropagation of mature trees of Ulmus glabra, Ulmus minor and Ulmus laevis. In: Jain SM, Häggman H (eds) Protocols for micropropagation of woody trees and fruits. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 237-246.
25. Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51: 659-668.
26. Maynard CA (1994) Six-year field test results of micropropagated black cherry (Prunus serotina). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 30: 64-69.
27. Meziane D, Shipley B (2001) Direct and indirect relationships between specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen and leaf gas exchange. Effects of irradiance and nutrient supply. Ann Bot 88: 915-927.
28. Mohammed GH, Binder WD, Gillies SL (1995) Chlorophyll fluorescence: a review of its practical forestry applications and instrumentation. Scand J Forest Res 10: 383-410.
29. Newhouse AE, Schrodt F, Liang H, Maynard CA, Powell WA (2007) Transgenic American elm shows reduced Dutch elm disease symptoms and normal mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Cell Rep 26: 977-987.
30. Nsangou M, Greenwood M (1998) Physiological and morphological differences between somatic, in vitro germinated and normal seedlings of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Can J Forest Res 28: 1088-1092.
31. Panda D, Dash PK, Dhal NK, Rout NC (2006) Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and chlorophyll content in mangrove species grown in different salinity. Gen Appl Plant Physiol 32: 175-180.
32. Percival GC, Sheriffs CN (2002) Identification of drought-tolerant woody perennials using chlorophyll fluorescence. J Arboric 28: 215-223.
33. 2 fixation: a critical analysis of the methods used. Ann Bot 41: 789-800.
34. Rahman MS, Messina MG, Newton RJ (2003) Performance of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings and micropropagated plantlets on an east Texas site II. Water relations. Forest Ecol Manag 178: 257-270.
35. Schneck V, Ewald D (2001) Growth and performance of micropropagated hybrid larch clones. Silvae Genet 50: 240-243.
36. Smalley EB, Guries RP (1993) Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31: 325-352.
37. Thakur RC, Karnosky DF (2007) Micropropagation and germplasm conservation of Central Park Splendor Chinese elm (Ulmus parvifolia Jacq. 'A/Ross Central Park') trees. Plant Cell Rep 26: 1171-1177.
38. Viherä-Aarnio A, Ryynänen L (1995) Growth, crown structure and seed production of birch seedlings, grafts and micropropagated plants. Silva Fenn 29: 3-12.
39. Zimmerman RH, Miller SS (1991) Orchard growth and fruiting of micropropagated apple trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116: 780-785.