Methods toward in vivo measurement of zebrafish epithelial and deep cell proliferation

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 103-117

  Campana, Matteo ^a   Maury, Benoit ^b   Dutreix, Marie ^c   Peyriéras, Nadine ^b   Sarti, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Automatic cell classification; Biomedical image processing; Cell density; Cell proliferation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY MEASUREMENTS; ANTICANCER DRUG; AUTOMATIC CELL CLASSIFICATION; AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION; BIO-MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING; CELL DENSITY; CLASSIFICATION ,; CLOUD OF POINT; DEEP CELLS; DEEP LAYER; DELAUNAY TRIANGULATION; DENSITY ESTIMATION; DENSITY ESTIMATOR; EMBRYONIC STAGES; EPITHELIAL CELLS; IN-VIVO; IN-VIVO MEASUREMENT; MINIMAL SURFACES; SCATTERED POINTS; ZEBRAFISH;

AUTOMATIC INDEXING; CELL PROLIFERATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; THICKNESS MEASUREMENT;

ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CELL DENSITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EPITHELIUM CELL; IMAGE PROCESSING; NONHUMAN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL COUNT; CELL PROLIFERATION; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EPITHELIUM; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 77952009254     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Megason S.G., Fraser S.E. Digitizing life at the level of the cell: high-performance laser-scanning microscopy and image analysis for in to imaging of development. Mech. Dev. 2003, 120:1407-1420.
2. Zon L.I., Peterson R.T. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 2005, 4:35-44.
3. Gratton E., Barry N.P., Beretta S., Celli A. Multiphoton fluorescence microscopy. Methods 2001, 25(1):103-110.
4. Frolkovic P., Mikula K., Peyriéras N., Sarti A. Cell counting and cell segmentation using advection-diffusion equations. Kybernetika 2007, 43:817-829.
5. Sell S. Stem cell origin of cancer and differentiation therapy. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2004, 51:1-28.
6. Kimmel C.B., Ballard W.W., Kimmel S.R., Ullmann B., Schilling T.F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 1995, 203:253-310.
7. Kane D.A., Warga R.M., Kimmel C.B. mitotic domains in the early embryo of the zebrafish. Nature 1992, 360:735-737.
8. Long F., Peng H., Liu X., Kim S., Myers G. Automatic Recognition of Cells (ARC) for 3D Images of C. elegans 2008, Springer Berlin-Heidelberg.
9. Theera-Umpon N., Dhompongsa S. Morphological granulometric features of nucleus in automatic bone marrow white blood cell classification. IEEE. Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2007, 11:353-359.
10. Stoyan D., Penttinen A. Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Statist. Sci. 2000, 15(1):61-78.
11. Morisita M. Estimation of population density by spacing method. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu. Univ. Ser. E 1954, 1:187-197.
12. Howard V., Reed M. Unbiased Stereology: Three-dimensional Measurement in Microscopy 1998, Oxford University Press.
13. L. Papaleo, Surface reconstruction: online mosaicing and modeling with uncertainty, PhD Thesis in Computer Science, Department of Computer Science, University of Genova, Italy, 2004.
14. Malpica N., de Solrzano C.O., Vaquero J.J., Santos A., Vallcorba I., Garca-Sagredo J.M., del Pozo F. Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. Cytometry 1997, 28:289-297.
15. Lockett S.J., Sudar D., Thompson C.T., Pinkel D., Gray J.W. Efficient, interactive, and three-dimensional segmentation of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections. Cytometry 1998, 31:275-286.
16. Solorzano C.O.D., Rodriguez E., Jones A., Pinkel D., Gray J., Sudar D., Lockett S. Segmentation of confocal microscope images of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections. J. Microsc. 1999, 193:212-226.
17. Sarti A., De Solorzano C.O., Lockett S., Malladi R. A geometric model for 3-D confocal image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2000, 47(12):1600-1609.
18. Padfield D., Rittscher J., Sebastian T., Thomas N., Roysam B. Spatios-temporal cell cycle analysis using 3d level set segmentation of unstained nuclei in line scan confocal fluorescence images. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro 2006, 1036-1039.
19. Wang X., He W., Metaxas D., Mathew R., White E. Cell segmentation and tracking using texture-adaptive snakes. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2007, 101-104.
20. Ortiz De Solorzano C., Malladi R., Lelivre S.A., Lockett S.J. Segmentation of nuclei and cells using membrane related protein markers. J. Microsc. 2001, 201:404-415.
21. Peng H. Bioimage informatics: a new area of engineering biology. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1827-1836.
22. Rizzi B., Campana M., Zanella C., Melani C., Cunderlik R., Kriv Z., Bourgine P., Mikula K., Pe-yrieras N., Sarti A. 3-d zebrafish embryo images filtering by nonlinear partial differential equations. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2007, 6252-6255.
23. Z. Kriva, K. Mikula, N. Peyriéras, B. Rizzi, A. Sarti, 3D early embryogenesis image filtering by nonlinear partial differential equations, Med. Image. Anal., under revision.
24. Sarti A., Malladi R., Sethian J.A. Subjective surfaces: a method for completing missing boundaries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 6258-6263.
25. Sarti A., Malladi R., Sethian J.A. Subjective surfaces: a geometric model for boundary completion. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2002, 46(3):201-221.
26. Caselles V., Kimmel R., Sapiro G., Sbert C. Minimal surfaces: a geometric three dimensional segmentation approach. Numer. Math. 1997, 77:423-451.
27. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, G. Sapiro, C. Sbert, Minimal surfaces based object segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 19 (4) (1997) 394-398. doi:10.1109/34.588023.
28. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1979, 9:62-66.
29. Ramsey F., Harrison K. A closer look at detectability. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2004, 11:73-84.
30. J.-D. Boissonnat, Geometric structures for three-dimensional shape representation, ACM Trans. Graph. 3 (4) (1984) 266-286. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/357346.357349.
31. Edelsbrunner H. Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry 1987, Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
32. Preparata F.P., Shamos M.I. Computational Geometry: An Introduction 1985, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
33. Paraview Parallel visualization application. URL http://paraview.org.
34. Campana M., Rizzi B., Melani C., Bourgine P., Peyriéras N., Sarti A. A framework for 4-d biomedical image processing visualization and analysis. Proceedings of the GRA 08-International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications 2008, 403-408.
35. Katanforoush A., Shahshahani M. Distributing points on the sphere. Exp. Math. 2003, 12:199-209.
36. Saff E., Kuijlaars A. Distributing many Points on a Sphere 1997, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.