Fitness epistasis among 6 biosynthetic loci in the budding yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages

  Hall, David W ^a   Agan, Matthew ^a   Pope, Sara C ^a  

^a University of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

Dominance by dominance epistasis; Evolution of sex; Fitness; Synergistic epistasis; Yeast

Indexed keywords

BUDDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIPLOIDY; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOIDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOSYNTHESIS; EPISTASIS; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MUTATION; PLOIDY; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SEX;

BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PLOIDIES; REPRODUCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEX; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 77952007724     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esq007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Barton NH. 1995. A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet Res. 65:123-144.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 57:289-300.
3. Brachmann CB, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, Boeke JD. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 14:115-132.
4. Burke D, Dawson D, Stearns T. 2000. Methods in yeast genetics. A cold spring harbor laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
5. Codón AC, Gasent-Ramírez JM, Benítez T. 1995. Factors which affect the frequency of sporulation and tetrad formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker's yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 61:630-638.
6. Crow JF, Kimura M. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
7. deVisser J A G M, Elena SF. 2007. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat Rev Genet. 8:139-149.
8. deVisser J A G M, Hoekstra RF, van den Ende H. 1997. Test of interaction between genetic markers that affect fitness in Aspergillus niger. Evolution. 101 (s1): 75-84.
9. deVisser J A G M, Park S, Krug J. 2009. Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes. Am Nat. 174: S15-S30.
10. Falconer DS, Mackay T F C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4 ed. Harlow, Essex (UK): Longmans Green.
11. Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q. 2003. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100:2574-2579.
12. Jasnos LK, Korona R. 2007. Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat Genet. 39:550-554.
13. Johnson LJ, Koufopanou V, Goddard MR, Hetherington R, Schafer SM, Burt A. 2004. Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics. 166:43-52.
14. Joseph SJ, Hall DW. 2004. Spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: more beneficial than expected. Genetics. 168:1817-1825.
15. Kondrashov AS. 1984. Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. I. The advantage of recombination. Genet Res. 44:199-217.
16. Kondrashov AS. 1988. Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature. 336:435-440.
17. Kouyos RD, Silander OK, Bonhoeffer S. 2007. Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination. Trends Ecol Evol. 22:308-315.
18. Misevic D, Kouyos RD, BonHoeffer S. 2009. Predicting the evolution of sex on complex fitness landscapes. PloS Comput Biol. 5: e1000510.
19. Mortimer RK. 2000. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 10:403-409.
20. Otto SP, Feldman MW. 1997. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 51:134-147.
21. Otto SP, Lenormand T. 2002. Resolving the paradox of sex and recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 3:252-261.
22. Reuter M, Bell G, Greig D. 2007. Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr Biol. 17: R81-R83.
23. Roze D. 2009. Diploidy, Population structure, and the evolution of recombination. Am Nat. 174: S79-S94.
24. Roze D, Lenormand T. 2005. Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination. Genetics. 170:841-857.
25. Sanjuán R, Elena SF. 2006. Epistasis correlates with genome complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:14402-14405.
26. Szafraniec K, Wloch D, Sliwa P, Borts R, Korona R. 2003. Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Res. 82:19-31.
27. Szathmary E. 1993. Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. Genetics. 133:127-132.
28. Weinreich DM, Chao L. 2005. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature. Evolution. 59:1175-1182.
29. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L. 2005. Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution. 59:1165-1174.
30. Whitlock MC, Bourget D. 2000. Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components. Evolution. 54:1654-1660.
31. Wilfert L, Gadau J, Schmid-Hempel P. 2007. Variation in genomic recombination rates among animal taxa and the case of social insects. Heredity. 98:189-197.
32. Wloch DM, Szafraniec K, Borts RH, Korona R. 2001. Epistatic interactions of spontaneous mutations in haploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Exp Biol. 14:310-316.