Anatomical structures and fiber morphology of new kenaf varieties

Asian Journal of Scientific Research

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 161-166

  H'ng, P S ^a   Khor, B N ^a   Tadashi, N ^a   Aini, A S N ^a   Paridah, M T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Anatomical structure; Fiber morphology; Kenaf varieties

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952005789     PISSN: 19921454     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2009.161.166     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aini, N.A.S., M.B. Hamzah, A.H. Hazandy, S. Ghizan and M.M.N. Fadzhel, 2000. Growth and phenology of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) varieties. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci., 32: 29-33.
2. Akgul M. and A. Tozluoglu T. 2009. Some chemical and morphological properties of juvenile woods from beech (Fagus orientalis L.) and pine (Pinus nigra A.) plantations. Trends Applied Sci. Res., 4: 116-125.
3. Alexopoulou, E., M. Christou, M. Mardikis and A. Chatziathanassiou, 2000. Growth and yields of kenaf varieties in central greece., Ind. Crops Prod., 11: 163-172.
4. Amaducci, S., M.T. Amaducci, R. Benati and G. Venturi. 2000. Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy. Ind. Crops Prod., 11: 179-186.
5. Ates, S, Y.H. Ni, M. Akgul and A. Tozluoglu, 2008, Characterization and evaluation of Paulownia elongota as a raw material for paper production. African J. Biotechnol., 7:4153-4158.
6. Haarer, A.E., 1952. Some observations on the cultivation of kenaf. Econ. Botany, 6: 18-22.
7. Hazandy, A.H., M.Y, Hazimy. N.A.S, Aini, Z. Baharom and M.M. Hanafi, 2009. Effects of different fertilizer application level on growth and physiology of Hibiscus cannabinus L. (Kenaf) planted on BRIS soil. J. Agric. Sci., 1: 121-131.
8. Ilic, J., 2002. Woods of eucalyplus-part 2: Distinguishing species from the stringybark group (E. baxteri, E. globoidea, E. muelleriana, E. macrorhyncha, E, consideniana and E. sieberi). IAWA J., 23: 305-318.
9. Petrini, C., R. Bazzocchi and P. Montalti, 1994. Yield potential and adaptation of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in north-central Italy. Ind. Crops Prod., 3: 11-15.
10. Smook, G,A., 2003, Handbook for Pulp and Paper Technologists. 3rd Edn., Angus Wilde Publications, Vancouver, B.C., ISBN-13; 978-0969462859.
11. Tsoumis, G., 1991. Science and Technology of Wood: Structure, Properties, Utilization. Chapman and Hall, London, New York, ISBN-10: 0442239858.
12. Voulgaridis, E., C. Passialis and A. Grigoriou, 2000. Anatomical characteristics and properties of kenaf stems (Hibiscus Cannabinus). IAWA J., 21: 435-442.
13. Webber, C.L., and R.E., Bledsoe, 1993, Kenaf: Production, Harvesting, Processing and Products, In: New Crops, Janick.J. and J.E. Simon (Eds). Wiley, New York, ISBN: 0-471-59374-5, pp: 416-421
14. Webberr C.L. III and V.K. Bledsoe, 2002. Plant maturity and kenaf yield components. Ind. Crops Prod., 16: 81-88.
15. Yu, H. and C. YU, 2007. Study on microbe retting of kenaf fiber. Ind. Crops Prod., 40: 1806-1809.