Is high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia still a risk factor for adenocarcinoma in the era of extended biopsy sampling?

Pathology

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 325-329

  Merrimen, Jennifer L ^a   Jones, Glenn ^b   Srigley, John R ^b,c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma; Extended biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; Risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952004130     PISSN: 00313025     EISSN: 14653931     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00313021003767306     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2008. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada, 2008.
2. Epstein JI, Herawi M. Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 2006;175:820-34.
3. Bostwick DG, Qian J. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2004;17:360-79.
4. Bostwick DG, Norlen BJ, Denis L. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: the preinvasive stage of prostate cancer. Overview of the prostate committee report. Scan J Urol Nephrol Suppl 2000;205:1-2.
5. Merrimen JL, Jones GJ, Walker D, et al. Multifocal high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a significant risk factor for prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol 2009;182:485-90.
6. Presti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systemic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies. Results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000;163:163-7.
7. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston DA, et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol 1997;158:2168-75.
8. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B, et al. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000;164:393-6.
9. Amin MM, Jeyaganth S, Fahmy N, et al. Subsequent prostate cancer detection in patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation. Can Urol Assoc J 2007;1:245-9.
10. Ploussard G, Plennevaux G, Allory Y, et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical small acinar proliferation on initial 21-core extended biopsy scheme: incidence and implications for patient care and surveillance. World J Urol 2009;27:587-92.
11. Campos-Fernandes J.-L., Bastien L, Nicolaiew N, et al. Prostate cancer detection in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy. Eur Urol 2009;55:600-9.
12. Herawi M, Kahane H, Cavallo C, Epstein JI. Risk of prostate cancer on first re-biopsy within 1 year following a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is related to the number of cores sampled. J Urol 2006;175:121-4.
13. De Nunzio C, Trucchi A, Miano R, et al. The number of cores positive for high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial biopsy is associated with prostate cancer on second biopsy. J Urol 2009;181:1069-75.
14. Roscigno M, Scattoni V, Freschi M, et al. Monofocal and plurifocal high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended prostate biopsies: Factors predicting cancer detection on extended repeat biopsy. Urology 2004;63:1105-10.
15. Akhavan A, Keith JD, Bastacky SI, et al. The proportion of cores with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on extended-pattern needle biopsy is significantly associated with prostate cancer on site-directed repeat biopsy. BJU Int 2007;99:765-9.
16. Netto GJ, Epstein JI. Widespread high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasiaonprostatic needle biopsy: A significant likelihood of subsequent diagnosed adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1184-8.