Grouping based feature attribution in metacontrast masking

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 107-109

  Otto, Thomas ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Attention; Feature attribution; Feature integration; Metacontrast masking; Motion grouping

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952001965     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/v10053-008-0018-z     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ögmen, H., Otto, T. U., & Herzog, M. H. (2006). Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision. Vision Research, 46, 3234-3242. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=16750550 [PubMed]
2. Otto, T. U., Ögmen, H., & Herzog, M. H. (2006). The flight path of the phoenix-the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision. Journal of Vision, 6, 1079-1086. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=17132079 [PubMed]
3. Scharlau, I. (2007). Temporal processes in prime-mask interaction: Assessing perceptual consequences of masked information. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 241-255. http://www.ac-psych.org/index.php?id=2&rok= 2007&issue=1-2#article-52
4. Stewart, A. L., & Purcell, D. G. (1970). U-shaped masking functions in visual backward masking - effects of target configuration and retinal position. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 253-256.
5. Stigler, R. (1910). Chronophotische Studien über den Umgebungskontrast. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie, 134, 365-435.
6. Stoper, A. E., & Banffy, S. (1977). Relation of split apparent motion to metacontrast. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 258-277. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=864398 [PubMed]
7. Toch, H. H. (1956). The perceptual elaboration of stroboscopic presentations. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 345-358. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 13354796 [PubMed]
8. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids= 7053925 [PubMed]
9. Werner, H. (1935). Studies on contour: I. Qualitative analyses. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 40-64.
10. Alpern, M. (1953). Metacontrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 648-657.
11. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ögmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices through conscious and unconscious vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Burr, D. C. (1984). Summation of target and mask metacontrast stimuli. Perception, 13, 183-192. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd= Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=6504678 [PubMed]
13. Hamker, F. E. (2007). The mechanisms of feature inheritance as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention and decision making. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 111-123. http://www.ac-psych.org/index.php?id= 2&rok=2007&issue=1-2#article-43
14. Herzog, M. H., & Koch, C. (2001). Seeing properties of an invisible object: feature inheritance and shine-through. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 4271-4275. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt= Abstract&list-uids=11274451 [PubMed]
15. Hogben, J. H., & Di Lollo, V. (1984). Practice reduces suppression in metacontrast and in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 441-445. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db= pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list-uids=6462870 [PubMed]