Commentary on Smolkowski et al. (2010): Why is it important to assume that non-responders in tobacco cessation trials have relapsed?

Addiction

Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1016-1017

  Hajek, Peter ^a,b   West, Robert ^c  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Smoking cessation outcomes; Smoking status imputation; Tobacco research methodology

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; RECURRENT DISEASE; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT DROPOUTS; RECURRENCE; TOBACCO USE CESSATION;

EID: 77951996195     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02964.x     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Smolkowski K., Danaher B. G., Seeley J. R., Kosty D. B., Severson H. H. Modeling missing binary outcome data in a successful web-based smokeless tobacco cessation program. Addiction 2010 105 : 1005 1015.
2. Foulds J., Stapleton J., Hayward M., Russell M. A., Feyerabend C., Fleming T., Costello J. Transdermal nicotine patches with low-intensity support to aid smoking cessation in outpatients in a general hospital. A placebo-controlled trial. Arch Fam Med 1993 2 : 417 423.
3. West R., Hajek P., Stead L., Stapleton J. Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: the need for a common standard. Addiction 2005 100 : 299 303. (Pubitemid 40363436)