If i were judge

Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodological Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 89-102

  Bringsjord, Selmer ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial Intelligence; Turing Test

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951986193     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6710-5_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J., 1994, Hyperproof, CSLI, Stanford, CA.
2. Bringsjord, S., 1992, What Robots Can and Can't Be, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
3. Bringsjord, S., 1995, Could, how could we tell if, and why should-androids have inner lives? in: Android Epistemology, K. Ford, C. Glymour, and P. Hayes, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 93-122.
4. Bringsjord, S. and Ferrucci, D., 2000, Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the Mind of Brutus, a Storytelling Machine, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Bringsjord, S. and Noel, R., 2002, Real robots and the missing thought experiment in the Chinese room dialectic, in: Views into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence, J. Preston and M. Bishop, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 144-166.
6. Bringsjord, S. and Schimanski, S., 2003, What is Artificial Intelligence? - Psychometric AI as an answer, Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 887-893.
7. Bringsjord, S. and Van Heuveln, B., 2003, The mental eye defense of an infinitized version of Yablo's paradox, Analysis 63(1):61-70.
8. Bringsjord, S. and Zenzen, M., 2003, Superminds: People Harness Hypercomputation, and More, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
9. Bringsjord, S., Ferrucci, D., and Bello, P., 2001, Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (better) Lovelace test, Minds and Machines 11:3-27.
10. Carpenter, P., Just, M., and Shell, P., 1990, What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven progressive matrices test, Psychological Review 97:404-431.
11. Descartes, R., 1911, The Philosophical Works of Descartes, Vol. 1, translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. Dickmann, M. A., 1975, Large Infinitary Languages, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
13. Ebbinghaus, H. D., Flum, J., and Thomas, W., 1984, Mathematical Logic, Springer, New York.
14. Johnson-Laird, P., 1997a, Rules and illusions: a critical study of Rips's, The Psychology of Proof, Minds and Machines 7(3):387-407.
15. Johnson-Laird, P. N., 1997b, An end to the controversy? A reply to Rips, Minds and Machines 7:425-432.
16. Johnson-Laird, P. and Savary, F., 1995, How to make the impossible seem probable, Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 381-384.
17. Kafka, F., 1948, The metamorphosis, in: The Penal Colony, F. Kafka, T. W. Muir, and E. Muir, eds., Schocken Books, New York.
18. Karp, C., 1964, Languages with Expressions of Infinite Length, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
19. Keisler, H., 1971, Model Theory for Infinitary Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
20. Kugel, P., 1990, Is it time to replace Turing's test? Paper presented at Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Science or Dying Art Form?, sponsored by AAAI and the State University of New York's program in Philosophy and Computer and Systems Sciences, the University at Binghamton, New York, June 27.
21. Raven, J. C., 1962, Advanced Progressive Matrices Set II, H. K. Lewis, London. Distributed in the USA by The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
22. Searle, J., 1980, Minds, brains and programs, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:417-424;
23. http://members.aol.com/NeoNoetics/MindsBrainsPrograms.html.
24. Turing, A., 1950, Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind 59(236):433-460.
25. Yablo, S., 1993, Paradox without self-reference, Analysis 53:251-252.