Digital fluoroscopic video assessment of glenohumeral migration: Static vs. Dynamic conditions

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1380-1385

  Teyhen, Deydre S ^a   Christ, Tansy R ^b   Ballas, Elissa R ^c   Hoppes, Carrie W ^d   Walters, Joshua D ^e   Christie, Douglas S ^a   Dreitzler, Gail ^f   Kane, Edward J ^g  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Seymour Johnson Air Force Base   (United States)

^d WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Bassett Army Community Hospital   (United States)

^f Headquarters   (United States)

^g University of St Augustine   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Fluoroscopy; Glenohumeral joint; Rotator cuff; Subacromial space

Indexed keywords

ARM ANGLE; ARM ELEVATION; DYNAMIC CONDITION; GLENOHUMERAL JOINT; GLENOID FOSSA; INTERACTION EFFECT; MAIN EFFECT; ROTATOR CUFF; STATIC AND DYNAMIC; STATIC IMAGING; T-TESTS; VIDEO ASSESSMENT;

BIOMECHANICS; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; ROTATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMERUS HEAD; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MUSCLE ISOTONIC CONTRACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; ROTATOR CUFF; SHOULDER;

ADULT; ARM; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; HUMERUS; MALE; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; SHOULDER JOINT; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 77951978190     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.026     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bang M.D., Deyle G.D. Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2000, 30(3):126-137.
2. Baratelli M., Cabitza P., et al. Role of computerized tomography in the evaluation of the stability of the glenohumeral articulation. Radiol. Med. (Torino) 1984, 70(10):714-717.
3. Birtane M., Calis M., et al. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Yonsei Med. J. 2001, 42(4):418-424.
4. Bourke, P., 1988. From . http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/geometry/pointline/.
5. Carmack D.B., Moed B.R., et al. Accuracy of detecting screw penetration of the acetabulum with intraoperative fluoroscopy and computed tomography. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2001, 83-A(9):1370-1375.
6. Chen S.K., Simonian P.T., et al. Radiographic evaluation of glenohumeral kinematics: a muscle fatigue model. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999, 8(1):49-52.
7. Collins R.A., Gristina A.G., et al. Ultrasonography of the shoulder. Static and dynamic imaging. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1987, 18(3):351-360.
8. Deutsch A., Altchek D.W., et al. Radiologic measurement of superior displacement of the humeral head in the impingement syndrome. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996, 5(3):186-193.
9. Ebraheim N.A., Mekhail A.O., et al. Axillary view of the glenoid articular surface. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000, 9(2):115-119.
10. Flatow E.L., Soslowsky L.J., et al. Excursion of the rotator cuff under the acromion. Patterns of subacromial contact. Am. J. Sports Med. 1994, 22(6):779-788.
11. Graichen H., Bonel H., et al. Sex-specific differences of subacromial space width during abduction, with and without muscular activity, and correlation with anthropometric variables. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001, 10(2):129-135.
12. Graichen H., Bonel H., et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the width of the subacromial space in healthy subjects and patients with impingement syndrome. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1999, 172(4):1081-1086.
13. Graichen H., Stammberger T., et al. Magnetic resonance-based motion analysis of the shoulder during elevation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2000, 370:154-163.
14. Hermann K.G., Backhaus M., et al. Rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder joint: comparison of conventional radiography, ultrasound, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2003, 48(12):3338-3349.
15. Hinterwimmer S., Von Eisenhart-Rothe R., et al. Influence of adducting and abducting muscle forces on the subacromial space width. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise 2003, 35(12):2055-2059.
16. Kido T., Itoi E., et al. The depressor function of biceps on the head of the humerus in shoulders with tears of the rotator cuff. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000, 82(3):416-419.
17. Ludewig P.M., Cook T.M. Translations of the humerus in persons with shoulder impingement symptoms. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2002, 32(6):248-259.
18. Mandalidis D.G., Mc Glone B.S., et al. Digital fluoroscopic assessment of the scapulohumeral rhythm. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1999, 21(4):241-246.
19. Newhouse K.E., el-Khoury G.Y., et al. The shoulder impingement view: a fluoroscopic technique for the detection of subacromial spurs. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1988, 151(3):539-541.
20. Papilion J.A., Shall L.M. Fluoroscopic evaluation for subtle shoulder instability [comment]. Am. J. Sports Med. 1992, 20(5):548-552.
21. Pfirrmann C.W., Huser M., et al. Evaluation of complex joint motion with computer-based analysis of fluoroscopic sequences. Invest. Radiol. 2002, 37(2):73-76.
22. Poppen N.K., Walker P.S. Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1976, 58(2):195-201.
23. Portney L.G., Watkins M.P. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice 2000, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 505-528. 2nd ed.
24. Roberts C.S., Davila J.N., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the subacromial space in the impingement sign positions. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002, 11(6):595-599.
25. Royer P.J., Kane E.J., et al. Fluoroscopic assessment of rotator cuff fatigue on glenohumeral kinematics in subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009, 18(6):968-975.
26. Talkhani I.S., Kelly C.P. Movement analysis of asymptomatic normal shoulders: a preliminary study. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001, 10(6):580-584.
27. Teyhen D.S., Miller J.M., et al. Rotator cuff fatigue and glenohumeral kinematics in participants without shoulder dysfunction. J. Athl. Train. 2008, 43(4):352-358.
28. Tillander B., Norlin R. Intraoperative measurements of the subacromial distance. Arthroscopy 2002, 18(4):347-352.
29. Tokuda O., Kunihiro Y., et al. Kinematic MRI of the normal shoulder using a specially designed positioning device. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2002, 26(5):849-854.
30. Yamaguchi K., Sher J.S., et al. Glenohumeral motion in patients with rotator cuff tears: a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000, 9(1):6-11.