Mesmerising mirror neurons

NeuroImage

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 789-791

  Heyes, Cecilia ^a  

^a ALL SOULS COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PARAPSYCHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING;

EID: 77951974201     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.034     Document Type: Note

References (40)

1. 2O PET study in heterosexual men. NeuroImage 2001, 14:105-117.
2. Calvo-Merino B., Grezes J., Glaser D.E., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1905-1910.
3. Caggiano V., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G., Their P., Casile A. Mirror neurons differentially encode the peripersonal and extrapersonal space of monkeys. Science 2009, 324:403-406.
4. Catmur C., Walsh V., Heyes C. Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1527-1531.
5. Catmur C., Gillmeister H., Bird G., Liepelt R., Brass M., Heyes C. Through the looking glass: counter-mirror activation following incompatible sensorimotor learning. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:1208-1215.
6. Catmur C., Walsh V., Heyes C.M. Associative sequence learning: The role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:2369-2380.
7. Cook, R., Press, C., Dickinson, A., Heyes, C.M., in press. The acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
8. D'Ausilio A., Altenmuller E., Olivetti B.M., Lotze M. Cross-modal plasticity of the motor cortex while listening to a rehearsed musical piece. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 24:955-958.
9. Dennett D.C. Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting 1984, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 1992, 91:176-180.
11. Emery N., Clayton N., Frith C. Social Intelligence: From brain to culture 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Ferrari P.F., Gallese V., Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L. Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2003, 17:1703-1714.
13. Ferrari P.F., Rozzi S., Fogassi L. Mirror neuron responding to observation of actions made with tools in monkey ventral premotor cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:212-226.
14. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 1996, 119:593-609.
15. Haslinger B., et al. Transmodal sensorimotor networks during action observation in professional pianists. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:282-293.
16. Heyes C.M. Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2001, 5:245-261.
17. Heyes C.M. Imitation by association. Perspectives on Imitation: From Mirror Neurons to Memes 2005, MIT Press. S. Hurley, N. Chater (Eds.).
18. Heyes C.M. Where do mirror neurons come from?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:575-583.
19. Hickok G. Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21:1229-1243.
20. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. 1962, 160:106-154.
21. Iacoboni, M. The mirror neuron revolution: Explaining what makes humans social. Scientific American July 1 (2008). http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-mirror-neuron-revolut.
22. Iacoboni M. Mirroring people: The new science of how we connect with others 2008, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York.
23. Keysers C., et al. Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 153:628-636.
24. Keysers C., Perrett D.I. Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:501-507.
25. Mahon B.Z. Action recognition: Is it a motor process?. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1068-1069.
26. Newman-Norlund R.D., van Schie H.T., van Zuijlen A., Bekkering H. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:817-818.
27. O'Keefe J., Dostrovsky J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat. Brain Res. 1971, 34:171-175.
28. Orofino G. Divination with mirrors. Tibetan Studies 1994, 2:612-628. Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture, Oslo. P. Kavaerne (Ed.).
29. Pobric G., Hamilton A. Action understanding requires left inferior frontal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:524-529.
30. Ramachandran, V.S. Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind the 'great leap forward' in human evolution. Edge, October 15 (2008). http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran/ramachandran_p1.html.
31. Ray, E.B., Heyes, C.M., in press. Imitation in infancy: the wealth of the stimulus. Dev. Sci.
32. Rizzolatti G., Arbib M.A. Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21:188-194.
33. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:169-192.
34. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. Mirrors in the Brain 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. Schultz W., Dickinson A. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 23:473-500.
36. Scott S.K., McGettigan C., Eisner F. A little more conversation, a little less action - candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:295-302.
37. Stein B.E., Magalhaes-Castro B., Kruger L. Relationship between visual and tactile representations in cat superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 1976, 39:401-419.
38. Tiedens L.Z., Fragale A.R. Power moves: complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84:558-568.
39. Turkeltaub P.E., Gareau L., Flowers D.L., Zeffiro T. Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:767-773.
40. Van Schie H.T., van Waterschoot B.M., Bekkering H. Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34:1493-1500.