The use of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescent in situ hybridization in postmortem pathology investigation of congenital malformations

Pediatric and Developmental Pathology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 85-94

  Goemaere, Natascha ^a   Douben, Hannie ^a   Van Opstal, Diane ^a   Wouters, Cokkie ^a   Tibboel, Dick ^a   De Krijger, Ronald ^a   De Klein, Annelies ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Autopsy; CGH; Congenital malformation; FISH

Indexed keywords

PARAFFIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOPSY; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DIGEORGE SYNDROME; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE DELETION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KARYOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; AUTOPSY; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; PARAFFIN EMBEDDING;

EID: 77951947266     PISSN: 10935266     EISSN: 16155742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2350/09-02-0612-OA.1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Schaeffer AJ, Chung J, Heretis K, Wong A, Ledbetter DH, Lese Martin C. Comparative genomic hybridization-array analysis enhances the detection of aneuploidies and submicroscopic imbalances in spontaneous miscarriages. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:1168-1174. (Pubitemid 38669315)
2. Tabet AC, Aboura A, Dauge MC, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of trophoblasts by comparative genomic hybridization in embryo-fetal development anomalies. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:613-618. (Pubitemid 32843914)
3. Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:1516-1521. (Pubitemid 30463070)
4. Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, et al. Cytogenetic analyses of culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)-re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 2001;9:539-547. (Pubitemid 32750495)
5. Forozan F, Karhu R, Kononen J, Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP. Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization. Trends Genet 1997;13:405-409. (Pubitemid 27431762)
6. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, Karger S. ISCN 2005: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger, 2005.
7. Lapierre JM, Tachdjian G. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities by comparative genomic hybridization. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:171-177. (Pubitemid 40432740)
8. Hopman AH, Ramaekers FC, Raap AK, et al. In situ hybridization as a tool to study numerical chromosome aberrations in solid bladder tumors. Histochemistry 1988;89:307-316.
9. Isaksen CV, Ytterhus B, Skarsvag S. Detection of trisomy 18 on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded material by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2000;3:249-255. (Pubitemid 30232850)
10. Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF. Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:137. (Pubitemid 38117460)
11. Calabrese G, Mingarelli R, Francalanci P, et al. Diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome in nuclei released from archival autoptic heart specimens using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet 1996;97:414-417. (Pubitemid 26081040)
12. Daniely M, Aviram-Goldring A, Barkai G, Goldman B. Detection of chromosomal aberration in fetuses arising from recurrent spontaneous abortion by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod 1998;13:805-809. (Pubitemid 28239178)