Positive family relationships and religious affiliation as mediators between negative environment and illicit drug symptoms in American Indian adolescents

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 694-699

  Yu, ManSoo ^a   Stiffman, Arlene R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescence; American Indians; Family relationships; Illicit drugs; Path analysis; Religion

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PEER GROUP; RELIGION; SCHOOL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; VIOLENCE;

ADOLESCENT; CULTURE; FAMILY; FAMILY RELATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RELIGION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951940412     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ackard D.M., Neumark-Sztainer D., Story M., Perry C. Parent-child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2006, 30(1):59-66.
2. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51(6):1173-1182.
3. Beauvais F. Characteristics of Indian youth and drug use. American Indian Alaska Native Mental Health Research 1992, 5(1):51-67.
4. Bennett J.A. Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: Conceptual and statistical differences. Research in Nursing and Health 2000, 23(5):415-420.
5. Bentler P.M. EQS structural equation program 1989, BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles.
6. Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 88:588-606.
7. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development 1979, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. U.S.Census Bureau Overview of race and Hispanic origin (Census 2000 Brief No.C2KBR/01-1) 2001, Author, Washington, DC.
9. Choi Y., Harachi T.W., Gillmore M.R., Catalano R.F. Applicability of the social development model to urban ethnic minority youth: Examining the relationship between external constraints, family socialization, and problem behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence 2005, 15(4):505-534.
10. Cliff N. Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1983, 18(1):115-126.
11. Cross T.L. Drawing on cultural tradition in Indian child welfare practice. Social Casework 1986, 67(5):283-289.
12. Farrington D.P. Juvenile delinquency. The school years 1992, 123-163. Routledge, London. 2nd ed. J.C. Coleman (Ed.).
13. Hadley-Ives E., Stiffman A.R., Elze D., Johnson S.D., Dore P. Measuring neighborhood and school environments: Perceptual and aggregate approaches. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 2000, 3(1):1-28.
14. Hanson R.F., Self-Brown S., Fricker-Elhai A.E., Kilpatrick D.G., Saunders B.E., Resnick H.S. The relations between family environment and violence exposure among youth: Findings from the national survey of adolescents. Child Maltreatment. Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children 2006, 11(1):3-15.
15. Hatcher L. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling 1994, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
16. Hawkins J.D., Weis J.G. The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention 1985, 6(2):73-97.
17. Herrenkohl T.I., Tajima E.A., Whitney S.D., Huang B. Protection against antisocial behavior in children exposed to physically abusive discipline. Journal of Adolescent Health 2005, 36(6):457-465.
18. Hudson W. The clinical measurement package: A field manual 1982, Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.
19. Hurdle D.E., Okamoto S.K., Miles B. Family influences on alcohol and drug use by American Indian youth: Implications for prevention. Journal of Family Social Work 2003, 7(1):53-68.
20. Johnston L.D., O'Malley P.M., Bachman J.G. National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future study, 1975-2000. Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 2000) 2001, Vol. I. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD.
21. Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications 1989, SPSS, Chicago.
22. O'Nell T.D., Mitchell C.M. Alcohol use among American Indian adolescents: The role of culture in pathological drinking. Social Science & Medicine 1996, 42(4):565-578.
23. Oetting E.R., Edwards R.W., Kelly K., Beauvais F. Risk and protective factors for drug use among rural American youth. NIDA Research Monograph 1997, 168:90-130.
24. Regnerus M.D., Burdette A. Religious change and adolescent family dynamics. Sociological Quarterly 2006, 47(1):175-194.
25. Reid R.J., Peterson N.A., Hughey J., Garcia-Reid P. School climate and adolescent drug use: Mediating effects of violence victimization in the urban high school context. Journal of Primary Prevention 2006, 27(3):281-292.
26. Robins L.N., Helzer J.E. The half-life of a structured interview: The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). Special Issue: A ten-year retrospective on the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Program. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 1994, 4(2):95-102.
27. Rutter M. School influences on children's behavior and development: The 1979 Kenneth Blackfan lecture. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry & Child Development 1981, 170-197. Children's Hospital Medical Center, Boston.
28. Ryan J.P., Testa M.F. Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency: Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review 2005, 27(3):227-249.
29. SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS 9.1.3 procedures guide, Second Edition, Volumes 1,2,3, and 4 2006, Author, Cary, NC.
30. Senate Report 108-075 To authorize the integration and consolidation of alcohol and substance abuse programs and services provided by Indian tribal governments, and for other purposes. No.143 2003.
31. Steiger J.H. A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling 1998, 5:411-419.
32. Stiffman A.R. Physical and sexual abuse in runaway youths. Child Abuse & Neglect 1989, 13(3):417-426.
33. Stiffman A.R., Hadley-Ives E., Elze D., Johnson S., Dore P. Impact of environment on adolescent mental health and behavior: Structural equation modeling. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1999, 69(1):73-86.
34. Stiffman A.R., Striley C.W., Brown E., Limb G., Ostmann E. American Indian youth: Southwestern urban and reservation youth's need for services and whom they turn to for help. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2003, 69(12):319-333.
35. Stiffman A.R., Freedenthal S., Brown E., Ostmann E., Hibbeler P. Field research with underserved minorities: The ideal and the real. Journal of Urban Health 2005, 82(2):iii56-iii66.
36. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (No. NSDUH Series H-34) 2008, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD.
37. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services [USDHHS] Risk and protective factors for adolescent drug use: Findings from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. No. Analytic series: A-12. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 01-3499 2001, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, MD.
38. Yu M., Stiffman A.R. Culture and environment as predictors of alcohol abuse/dependence symptoms in American Indian youths. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(10):2253-2259.
39. Yu M., Stiffman A.R., Freedenthal S. Factors affecting American Indian adolescent tobacco use. Addictive Behaviors 2005, 30(5):889-904.