Doubled haploids in commercial maize breeding: One-stage and two-stage phenotypic selection versus marker-assisted recurrent selection 1

Maydica

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 439-448

  Mayor, P J ^a   Bernardo, R ^b  

^a JEALOTT S HILL RESEARCH STATION   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Doubled haploids; Marker assisted recurrent selection; Molecular markers

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77951933967     PISSN: 00256153     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BERNARDO R., 2002 Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, Minnesota, USA.
2. BERNARDO R., 2008 Molecular markers and selection for complex traits: Learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 48: 1649-1664.
3. BERNARDO R., J. Yu, 2007 Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47: 1082-1090. (Pubitemid 47309157)
4. 1 family recurrent selection for testcross performance in a maize population. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 1063-1072.
5. CHOO T.M., L.W. KANNENBERG, 1988 Selection response and efficiency of doubled-haploid recurrent selection in a cross-fertilized species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 410-414.
6. DUVICK D.N., K.G. CASSMAN, 1999 Post-Green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the Northcentral United States. Crop Sci. 39: 1622-1630.
7. EATHINGTON S.R., T.M CROSBIE, M.D. EDWARDS, R.S. REITER, J.K. BULL, 2007 Molecular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 47: S154-S163.
8. EDWARDS M., L. JOHNSON, 1994 RFLPs for rapid recurrent selection, pp. 33-40. In: Analysis of molecular marker data. Joint Plant Breeding Symp. Ser., Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 5-6 August 1994, Corvallis, Oregon. Crop Sei. Soc. Am., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
9. FEDERER W.T., 1961 Augmented designs with one-way elimination of heterogeneity. Biometrics 17: 447-473.
10. GALLAIS A., 1988 A method of line development using doubled haploids: the single doubled haploid descent recurrent selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 330-332.
11. GALLAIS A., 1990 Quantitative genetics of doubled haploid populations and application to the theory of line development. Genetics 124: 199-206.
12. GALLAIS A., J. BORDES, 2007 The use of doubled haploids in recurrent selection and hybrid development in maize. Crop Sei. 47: S190-S201.
13. GRIFFING B., 1975 Efficiency changes due to use of doubled haploids in recurrent selection methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 46: 367-386.
14. GORDILLO A., H.H. GEIGER, 2008 Alternative recurrent selection strategies using doubled haploids lines in hybrid maize breeding. Crop Sci. 48: 911-922.
15. GORDILLO G.A., H.H. GEIGER, 2008 Optimization of DH-line based recurrent selection procedures in maize under a restricted annual loss of genetic variance. Euphytica 161: 141-154.
16. HYNE V, M.J. KEARSEY, D.J. PIKE, J.W. SNAPE, 1995 QTL analysis: unreliability and bias in estimation procedures. Mol. Breed. 1: 273-282
17. th Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf., 5-7 Dec 2001, Chicago, Illinois. Am. Seed Trade Assoc., Washington, DC.
18. JOHNSON R., 2004 Marker-assisted selection. Plant Breed. Rev. 24: 293-309.
19. KAO C.-H., Z.-B. ZENG, R.D. TEASDALE, 1999 Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 152: 1203-1216. (Pubitemid 29330915)
20. KEMPTHORNE O., A.W. NORDSKOG, 1959 Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 15: 10-19.
21. LANDE R., R. THOMPSON, 1990 Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124: 743-756. (Pubitemid 20106345)
22. LONGLN C.F.H., H.F. UTZ, J.C. REIF, W. SCHIPPRACK, A.E. MELCHINGER, 2006 Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: I. One-stage versus two-stage selection for testcross performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 903-912.
23. LONGIN C.F.H., H.F. UTZ, J.C. REIF, T. WEGENAST, W. SCHIPPRACK, A.E. MELCHINGER, 2007 Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: III. Efficiency of early testing prior to doubled haploid production in two-stage selection for testcross performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115: 519-527.
24. 2 populations. Crop Sci. 49: 1719-1725.
25. NANDA D.K., S.S. CHASE, 1966 An embryo marker for detecting monoploids of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 6: 213-215.
26. PEŠEK J., R.J. BAKER, 1969 Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49: 803-804.
27. RAGOT M., G. GAY, R. FISCH, D. WILLE, D. LESPINASSE, M. LHERMINE, O. ARGIUJER, 2008 Process for selecting individuals and designing a breeding program, Patent application: G06F19/00; A01H1/04.
28. SAS INSTITUTE, 2004 SAS STAT 9.1 user's guide. Vol.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
29. st Annu. Illinois Corn Breeders School. 78 Mar 2005. Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
30. WANG S., C.J. BASTEN, Z.-B. ZENG, 2007 Windows QTL Cartographer 2.0. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
31. WEGENAST T., CRH. LONGIN, H.F. UTZ, A.E. MELCHINGER, H.P. MAURER, J.C. REIF, 2008 Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids. IV. Number versus size of crosses and importance of parental selection in two-stage selection for testcross performance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117: 251-260.
32. WILLIAMS J.S., 1962 The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18: 375-393.
33. YOUSEF G.G., J.A. JUVIK, 2001 Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn. Crop Sci. 41: 645-655.
34. ZENG Z.-B., 1994 Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457-1468. (Pubitemid 24097872)