메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 131-138

Principles of Evidence-Based Medicine

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; Evidence based medicine; Orthopedics; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK REDUCTION; SURGEON; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

EID: 77951885427     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.001     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (16)

References (30)
  • 2
    • 60549083985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based medicine: why bother?
    • Bhandari M. Evidence-based medicine: why bother?. Arthroscopy 2009, 25(3):296-297.
    • (2009) Arthroscopy , vol.25 , Issue.3 , pp. 296-297
    • Bhandari, M.1
  • 3
    • 0028842519 scopus 로고
    • Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
    • Guyatt G.H., Sackett D.L., Sinclair J.C., et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995, 274(22):1800-1804.
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.274 , Issue.22 , pp. 1800-1804
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Sackett, D.L.2    Sinclair, J.C.3
  • 4
    • 0030027092 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
    • Sackett D.L., Rosenberg W.M., Gray J.A., et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996, 312(7023):71-72.
    • (1996) BMJ , vol.312 , Issue.7023 , pp. 71-72
    • Sackett, D.L.1    Rosenberg, W.M.2    Gray, J.A.3
  • 5
    • 84879547725 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Office of Evidence-Based Surgery charts course for improved system of care
    • Jones R.S., Richards K. Office of Evidence-Based Surgery charts course for improved system of care. Bull Am Coll Surg 2003, 88(4):11-21.
    • (2003) Bull Am Coll Surg , vol.88 , Issue.4 , pp. 11-21
    • Jones, R.S.1    Richards, K.2
  • 6
    • 33749599746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review
    • Panesar S.S., Thakrar R., Athanasiou T., et al. Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review. J R Soc Med 2006, 99(9):470-472.
    • (2006) J R Soc Med , vol.99 , Issue.9 , pp. 470-472
    • Panesar, S.S.1    Thakrar, R.2    Athanasiou, T.3
  • 7
    • 0027379794 scopus 로고
    • Where's the meat in clinical journals?
    • Haynes R.B. Where's the meat in clinical journals?. ACP J Club 1993, 119:A23-A24.
    • (1993) ACP J Club , vol.119
    • Haynes, R.B.1
  • 8
    • 46749131798 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
    • Weiser T.G., Regenbogen S.E., Thompson K., et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008, 372(9633):139-144.
    • (2008) Lancet , vol.372 , Issue.9633 , pp. 139-144
    • Weiser, T.G.1    Regenbogen, S.E.2    Thompson, K.3
  • 9
    • 63249095044 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Getting there from here: how should Obama reform health care?
    • Gawande A. Getting there from here: how should Obama reform health care?. New Yorker 2009, 1:26-33.
    • (2009) New Yorker , vol.1 , pp. 26-33
    • Gawande, A.1
  • 10
    • 40149088788 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials
    • Sung J., Siegel J., Tornetta P., et al. The orthopaedic trauma literature: an evaluation of statistically significant findings in orthopaedic trauma randomized trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008, 9:14.
    • (2008) BMC Musculoskelet Disord , vol.9 , pp. 14
    • Sung, J.1    Siegel, J.2    Tornetta, P.3
  • 11
    • 35448970592 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies
    • Chan S., Bhandari M. The quality of reporting of orthopaedic randomized trials with use of a checklist for nonpharmacological therapies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89(9):1970-1978.
    • (2007) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.89 , Issue.9 , pp. 1970-1978
    • Chan, S.1    Bhandari, M.2
  • 12
    • 77951898986 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Available at:, Accessed August 5, 2009
    • Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Available at:, Accessed August 5, 2009. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025.
  • 13
    • 63849290421 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions
    • Brozek J.L., Akl E.A., Alonso-Coello P., et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions. Allergy 2009, 64(5):669-677.
    • (2009) Allergy , vol.64 , Issue.5 , pp. 669-677
    • Brozek, J.L.1    Akl, E.A.2    Alonso-Coello, P.3
  • 14
    • 34147160158 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Misconceptions about practicing evidence-based orthopedic surgery
    • Poolman R.W., Petrisor B.A., Marti R.K., et al. Misconceptions about practicing evidence-based orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop 2007, 78(1):2-11.
    • (2007) Acta Orthop , vol.78 , Issue.1 , pp. 2-11
    • Poolman, R.W.1    Petrisor, B.A.2    Marti, R.K.3
  • 15
    • 0037097838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions
    • McCulloch P., Taylor I., Sasako M., et al. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. BMJ 2002, 324(7351):1448-1451.
    • (2002) BMJ , vol.324 , Issue.7351 , pp. 1448-1451
    • McCulloch, P.1    Taylor, I.2    Sasako, M.3
  • 16
    • 19944425951 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials
    • Devereaux P.J., Bhandari M., Clarke M., et al. Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005, 330:88.
    • (2005) BMJ , vol.330 , pp. 88
    • Devereaux, P.J.1    Bhandari, M.2    Clarke, M.3
  • 17
    • 45849098778 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials
    • Bednarska E., Bryant D., Devereaux P.J., et al. Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(7):1734-1744.
    • (2008) Clin Orthop Relat Res , vol.466 , Issue.7 , pp. 1734-1744
    • Bednarska, E.1    Bryant, D.2    Devereaux, P.J.3
  • 18
    • 66349125934 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Multicenter collaboration in observational research: improving generalizability and efficiency
    • Sprague S., Matta J.M., Bhandari M. Multicenter collaboration in observational research: improving generalizability and efficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(Suppl 3):80-86.
    • (2009) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.91 , Issue.3 SUPPL , pp. 80-86
    • Sprague, S.1    Matta, J.M.2    Bhandari, M.3
  • 19
    • 36849065071 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
    • von Elm E., Altman D.G., Egger M., et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007, 370(9596):1453-1457.
    • (2007) Lancet , vol.370 , Issue.9596 , pp. 1453-1457
    • von Elm, E.1    Altman, D.G.2    Egger, M.3
  • 20
    • 77951913286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measures of relative effect: the risk ratio and odds ratio. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available at: Accessed January 22, 2010.
    • Measures of relative effect: the risk ratio and odds ratio. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available at: Accessed January 22, 2010. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
    • (2009)
  • 21
    • 1442331577 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for orthopaedic surgeons
    • Kocher M.S., Zurakowski D. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86(3):607-620.
    • (2004) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.86 , Issue.3 , pp. 607-620
    • Kocher, M.S.1    Zurakowski, D.2
  • 22
    • 0025794172 scopus 로고
    • Publication bias in clinical research
    • Easterbrook P.J., Berlin J.A., Gopalan R., et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991, 337(8746):867-872.
    • (1991) Lancet , vol.337 , Issue.8746 , pp. 867-872
    • Easterbrook, P.J.1    Berlin, J.A.2    Gopalan, R.3
  • 23
    • 40349109012 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)
    • Okike K., Kocher M.S., Mehlman C.T., et al. Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(3):595-601.
    • (2008) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.90 , Issue.3 , pp. 595-601
    • Okike, K.1    Kocher, M.S.2    Mehlman, C.T.3
  • 24
    • 34247599269 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature: tips for critical appraisal
    • Poolman R.W., Kerkhoffs G.M., Struijs P.A., et al. Don't be misled by the orthopedic literature: tips for critical appraisal. Acta Orthop 2007, 78(2):162-171.
    • (2007) Acta Orthop , vol.78 , Issue.2 , pp. 162-171
    • Poolman, R.W.1    Kerkhoffs, G.M.2    Struijs, P.A.3
  • 25
    • 1342326075 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures
    • Bhandari M., Tornetta P., Ellis T., et al. Hierarchy of evidence: differences in results between non-randomized studies and randomized trials in patients with femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004, 124(1):10-16.
    • (2004) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg , vol.124 , Issue.1 , pp. 10-16
    • Bhandari, M.1    Tornetta, P.2    Ellis, T.3
  • 26
    • 14644444526 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sicily statement on evidence based practice
    • Dawes M., Summerskill W., Glasziou P., et al. Sicily statement on evidence based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005, 5(1):1.
    • (2005) BMC Med Educ , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 1
    • Dawes, M.1    Summerskill, W.2    Glasziou, P.3
  • 27
    • 77951892893 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United Stated National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Available at:, Accessed January 22, 2010
    • What is the difference between PubMed and MEDLINE? United Stated National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Available at:, Accessed January 22, 2010. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html.
    • What is the difference between PubMed and MEDLINE?
  • 28
    • 0035011977 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • User's guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy
    • Bhandari M., Guyatt G.H., Swiontkowski M.F. User's guide to the orthopaedic literature: how to use an article about a surgical therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83(6):916-926.
    • (2001) J Bone Joint Surg Am , vol.83 , Issue.6 , pp. 916-926
    • Bhandari, M.1    Guyatt, G.H.2    Swiontkowski, M.F.3
  • 30
    • 0003876134 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Available at:, Accessed January 22, 2010
    • Principles for best practice in clinical audit National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), Available at:, Accessed January 22, 2010. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/796/23/BestPracticeClinicalAudit.pdf.
    • Principles for best practice in clinical audit


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.