From crude law to civil relations: The dynamics and potential resolution of intractable conflict

Peace and Conflict

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 189-209

  Nowak, Andrzej ^a   Deutsch, Morton ^b   Bartkowski, WiesŁaw ^c   Solomon, Sorin ^d  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c SWPS UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES   (Poland)

^d HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CRUDE OIL; MODEL; SIMULATION;

EID: 77951884330     PISSN: 10781919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10781911003691617     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Azar, E. E. (1986). Management of protracted social conflict in the third world. Ethnic Studies Report, 4(2).
2. Azar, E. E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict: Theory and cases. Hampshire, UK: Dartmouth.
3. Burton, J. (1987). Resolving deep-rooted conflict: A handbook. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
4. Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework-I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1-37.
5. Coleman, P. T. (2004). Paradigmatic framing of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework-II. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 197-235.
6. Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Approaching protracted conflicts as dynamical systems: Guidelines and methods for intervention. In A. Schneider & C. Honeyman (Eds.), The negotiator's fieldbook (pp. 61-74). Chicago: American Bar Association Books.
7. Coleman, P. T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2007). Intractable conflict as an attractor: Presenting a dynamical model of conflict, escalation, and intractability. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1454-1475.
8. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-151.
9. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Fife, P. C. (1979). Mathematical aspects of reacting and diffusing systems. New York: Springer.
11. Gilbert, G. N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the Social Scientist. Buckingham: Open University Press.
12. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1993). Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 147-171.
13. Kriesberg, L. (1999). Intractable conflict. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332-342). New York: Continuum.
14. Kriesberg, L. (2005). Nature, dynamics, and phases of intractability. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict (pp. 65-98). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
15. Louzoun, Y., Shnerb, N. M., & Solomon, S. (2007). Microscopic noise, adaptation and survival in hostile environments. European Physics Journal, 56, 141-148.
16. Nowak, A. (2004). Dynamical minimalism: Why less is more in psychology? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 183-193.
17. Nowak, A., & Lewenstein, M. (1994). Dynamical systems: A tool for social psychology? In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 17-53). San Diego: Academic.
18. Nowak, A., & Solomon, S. (2006, October). Alphabet Model of social processes. Paper presented at the conference on Complexity Models of Social and Economic Processes, Torino, Italy.
19. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford.
20. Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. R., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., & Coleman, P. T. (2006). Attracted to conflict: A dynamical perspective on malignant social relations. In A. Golec & K. Skarzynska (Eds.), Understanding social change: Political psychology in Poland (pp. 33-49). Hauppague, NY: Nova Science.
21. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Pruitt, D., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Shnerb, N. M., Louzoun, Y., Bettelheim, E., & Solomon, S. (2000). The importance of being discrete; life always wins on the surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 10322-10324.
24. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (Eds.). (1994). Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.
25. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2007). Dynamical social psychology: Finding order in the flow of human experience. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 734-758). New York: Guilford.
26. Volkan, V. D. (1998). The tree model: Psychopolitical dialogues and the promotion of coexistence. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 343-358). New York: Continuum.