Approximation of bayesian inverse problems for PDES

SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 322-345

  Cotter, S L ^a   Dashti, M ^a   Stuart, A M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Data assimilation; Inverse problem; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Stokes flow

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; DATA ASSIMILATION; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO; STOKES FLOWS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DATA PROCESSING; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; STABILITY;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 77951852928     PISSN: 00361429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/090770734     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Apte, C. K. R. T. Jones, A. M. Stuart, and J. Voss, Data assimilation: Mathematical and statistical perspectives, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 56 (2008), pp. 1033-1046.
2. S. R. Arridge, J. P. Kaipio, V. Kolehmainen, M. Schweiger, E. Somersalo, and T. Tarvainen, Approximation errors and model reduction with an application to optical diffusion tomography, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), pp. 175-195.
3. V. I. Bogachev, Gaussian Measures, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.
4. D. Calvetti and E. Somersalo, Introduction to bayesian scientific computing, Surveys and Tutorials in the Applied Mathematical Sciences 2, Springer, New York, 2007.
5. S. L. Cotter, M. Dashti, J. C. Robinson, and A. M. Stuart, Bayesian inverse problems for functions and applications to fluid mechanics, Inverse Problems, 25 (2010), p. 115008.
6. S. L. Cotter, M. Dashti, J. C. Robinson, and A. M. Stuart, MCMC Methods on Function Space and Applications to Fluid Mechanics, in preparation, 2010.
7. M. Dashti and J. C. Robinson, A simple proof of uniqueness of the particle trajectories for solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations, Nonlinearity, 22 (2009), pp. 735-746.
8. H. K. Engl, M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer, Regularization of inverse problems, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 1996.
9. J. N. Franklin, Well-posed stochastic extensions of ill posed linear problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 31 (1970), pp. 682-716.
10. A. Hofinger and H. K. Pikkarainen, Convergence rates for the Bayesian approach to linear inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 23 (2007), pp. 2469-2484.
11. K. Ide, M. Courier, M. Ghil, and A. Lorenc, Unified notation for assimilation: Operational, sequential and variational, J. Met. Soc. Japan, 75 (1997), pp. 181-189. (Pubitemid 127712495)
12. J. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and computational inverse problems, Applied Mathematical Sciences 160, Springer, New York, 2005.
13. J. P. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Approximation errors in nonstationary inverse problems, Inverse Prob. Imag., 1 (2007), pp. 77-93.
14. J. P. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical inverse problems: Discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 198 (2007), pp. 493-504.
15. A. Kirsch, An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Inverse Problems, Springer, New York, 1996.
16. M. S. Lehtinen, L. Paivarinta, and E. Somersalo, Linear inverse problems for generalized random variables, Inverse Problems, 5 (1989), pp. 599-612.
17. J. Liu, Monte Carlo strategies in scientific computing, Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, New York, 2001.
18. A. Neubauer and H. K. Pikkarainen, Convergence results for the Bayesian inversion theory, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 16 (2008), pp. 601-613.
19. N. K. Nichols, Data assimilation: Aims and basic concepts, Data Assimilation for the Earth System, R. Swinbank, V. Shutyaev, and W. A. Lahoz, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2003, pp. 9-20.
20. A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 1983.
21. H. K. Pikkarainen, State estimation approach to nonstationary inverse problems: Discretization error and filtering problem, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), pp. 365-379.
22. G. Da Prato and J. Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 44, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
23. C. Schwab and R. A. Todor, Karhunen-Loeve approximation of random fields in domains by generalized fast multipole methods, J. Comput. Phys., 217 (2006), pp. 100-122.
24. I. Sloan and H. Wozniakowski, When are quasi-Monte Carlo algorithms efficient for highdimensional integrals? J. Complexity, 14 (1998), pp. 1-33
25. P. D. Spanos and R. Ghanem, Stochastic finite element expansion for random media, J. Eng. Mech., 115 (1989), pp. 1035-1053.
26. P. D. Spanos and R. Ghanem, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, Dover, New York, 2003.
27. A. M. Stuart, Inverse problems: A Bayesian approach, Acta Numer., 19 (2010), to appear.
28. A. Tarantola, Inverse Problem Theory. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2005.
29. R. Temam, Navier-Stokes equations and nonlinear functional analysis, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 66, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1995.
30. R. Temam, Navier-Stokes equations. AMS Chelsea, Providence, RI, 2001.
31. R. A. Todor and C. Schwab, Convergence rates for sparse chaos approximations of elliptic problems with stochastic coefficients, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 27 (2007), pp. 232-261.
32. C. R. Vogel, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2002.
33. L. W. White, A study of uniqueness for the initialiazation problem for burgers' equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 172 (1993), pp. 412-431.