Interactive open access publishing and public peer review: The effectiveness of transparency and self-regulation in scientific quality assurance

IFLA Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 40-46

  Pöschl, Ulrich ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaborative peer review; Open peer commentary; Open peer review; Scientific evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951839545     PISSN: 03400352     EISSN: 17452651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0340035209359573     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Pöschl, U. Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance. Learned Publishing, 17, 105-113, 2004.
2. Bodenschatz, E., and Pöschl U. Open access and quality assurance. In: Open access challenges and perspectives - a handbook. European Commission and German Commission for UNESCO, 2008.
3. Pöschl, U. and Koop, T. Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance. Information Services & Use, 28 (Special issue APE 2008: Academic Publishing in Europe, Quality and Publishing, IOS Press), 105-107, 2008.
4. Pöschl, U. Interactive open access peer review: the Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics model. Against the Grain, submitted, 2009.
5. Müller, U. Peer-Review-Verfahren zur Qualitätssicherung von Open-Access-Zeitschriften - Systematische Klassifikation und empirische Untersuchung. PhD thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin, 2008.
6. Schultz, D.M. Rejection rates for journals publishing atmospheric science. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, submitted, 2009.
7. David, P.A. and Uhlir, P.F. Creating the information commons for e-science: Toward institutional policies and guidelines for action. Workshop Proceedings, UNESCO, Paris, 2005.
8. References 1-4 are freely available on the Internet: http://www.atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net/general_information/public_relations.html.