Improbable predictions at capital sentencing: Contrasting prison violence outcomes

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-72

  Cunningham, Mark D ^a   Sorensen, Jon R ^a  

^a Prairie View AandM University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EXPERT WITNESS; FORECASTING; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONER; PUNISHMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

ADULT; CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; EXPERT TESTIMONY; FORECASTING; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; PRISONERS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VIOLENCE;

EID: 77951815562     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)
2. Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976)
3. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. Art. 37.071(b) (1975-1976)
4. Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1 (1986)
5. Blume JH, Garvey SP, Johnson SL: Future dangerousness in capital cases: always "at issue." Cornell Law Rev 86:387-399, 2001
6. Appelbaum PS: Hypotheticals, psychiatric testimony, and the death sentence. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 12:169-177, 1984
7. Davis P: Texas capital sentencing procedures: the role of the jury and the restraining hand of the expert. J Crim Law Criminol 69: 300-310, 1978
8. Dix GE: Expert prediction testimony in capital sentencing: evidentiary and constitutional considerations. Am Crim Law Rev 19: 1-48, 1981
9. Ewing CP: "Dr. Death" and the case for an ethical ban on psychiatric and psychological predictions of dangerousness in capital sentencing proceedings. Am J Law Med 8: 408-428, 1983
10. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS: Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence. Law Hum Behav 16: 621-633, 1992
11. Leong GB, Weinstock R, Silva JA, et al: Psychiatry and the death penalty: the past decade. Psychiatr Ann 23: 41-47, 1993
12. Worrell CM: Psychiatric prediction of dangerousness in capital sentencing: the quest for innocent authority. Behav Sci Law 5:433-446, 1987
13. Wyda J, Black B: Psychiatric predictions and the death penalty: an unconstitutional sword for the prosecution but a constitutional shield for the defense. Behav Sci Law 7:505-519, 1989 (Pubitemid 20004682)
14. Cunningham MD: Dangerousness and death: a nexus in search of science and reason. Am Psychol 61: 828-839, 2006
15. Cunningham MD: Informed consent in capital sentencing evaluations: targets and content. J Prof Psychol Res Pract 37: 452-459, 2006
16. Cunningham MD, Goldstein AM: Sentencing determinations in death penalty cases, in Handbook of Psychology: Forensic Psychology (vol 11). Edited by Goldstein A. Series edited by Weiner I. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003, pp 407-436
17. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ: Integrating base rate data in violence risk assessments at capital sentencing. Behav Sci Law 16: 71-95, 1998
18. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ: Don't confuse me with the facts: common errors in violence risk assessment at capital sentencing. Crim Just Behav 26: 20-43, 1999
19. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ: A matter of life or death: special considerations and heightened practice standards in capital sentencing evaluations. Behav Sci Law 19: 473-490, 2001
20. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ: Violence risk assessment at federal capital sentencing: individualization, generalization, relevance, and scientific standards. Crim Just Behav 29: 512-537, 2002
21. Edens JF, Buffington-Vollum JK, Keilen A, et al: Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: is it time to "disinvent the wheel." Law Hum Behav 29:55-86, 2005
22. Sorensen JR, Pilgrim RL: An actuarial risk assessment of violence posed by capital murder defendants. J Crim Law Criminol 90: 1251-70, 2000
23. American Psychiatric Association: Brief for American Psychiatric Association as amicus curiae in Barefoot v. Estelle, in the United States Supreme Court, 1983
24. Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 (1983)
25. U.S. Department of Justice: Suicide and homicide in state prisons and local jails. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. NCJ 210036. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, August, 2005
26. Cunningham MD: Institutional misconduct among capital murderers, in Violent Offenders: Theory, Research, Public Policy, and Practice. Edited by DeLisi M, Conis PJ. Boston: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2008, pp 237-253
27. Marquart JW, Ekland-Olson S, Sorensen JR: Gazing into the crystal ball: can jurors accurately predict dangerousness in capital cases? Law Soc Rev 23:449-468, 1989
28. Marquart JW, Sorensen JR: A national study of the Furmancommuted inmates: assessing the threat to society from capital offenders. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev 23: 5-28, 1989
29. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ, Sorensen JR: Assertions of "future dangerousness" at federal capital sentencing: rates and correlates of subsequent prison misconduct and violence. Law Hum Behav 32: 46-63, 2008
30. Sorensen JR, Cunningham MD: Conviction offense and prison violence: a comparative study of murderers and other offenders. Crime Delinq 56: 103-25, 2010
31. Harer M: Assaults on BOP staff and inmates-where and when they occur. Research Forum, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 2: 1-19, 1992
32. Texas Department of Criminal Justice: Emergency Action Center select statistics: May 2008. Huntsville, TX: Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 2008
33. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ, Sorensen JR: Is death row obsolete?-a decade of mainstreaming death-sentenced inmates in Missouri. Behav Sei Law 23: 307-320, 2005
34. Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR: Capital offenders in Texas prisons: rates, correlates, and an actuarial analysis of violent misconduct. Law Hum Behav31: 553-571, 2007
35. 35. Reidy TJ, Cunningham MD, Sorensen J: From death to life: prison behavior of former death row inmates in Indiana. Crim Just Behav 28: 62-82, 2001 (Pubitemid 33223347)
36. 36. Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR, Reidy TJ: An actuarial model for assessment of prison violence risk among maximum security inmates. Assessment 12: 40-49, 2005 (Pubitemid 40900461)
37. 37. Sorensen J, Wrinkle RD: No hope for parole: disciplinary infractions among death-sentenced and life-without-parole inmates. Crim Jusr Behav 23: 542-552, 1996 (Pubitemid 126318230)
38. Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR: Nothing to lose?-a comparative examination of prison misconduct rates among life-withoutparole and other long-term high security inmates. Crim Just Behav 33: 683-705, 2006
39. Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR: Actuarial models for assessment of prison violence risk: revisions and extensions of the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison (RASP). Assessment 13: 253-265, 2006
40. Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ: Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: diagnostic dilemmas in classifying patterns of antisocial behavior in sentencing evaluations. Behav Sci Law 16: 331-51, 1998
41. Edens JF, Petrila J, Buffington-Vollum JK: Psychopathy and the death penalty: can the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised identify offenders who represent "a continuing threat to society?" J Psychiatry Law 29: 433-81, 2001
42. Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE: Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243: 1668-1674, 1989
43. Monahan J: Predicting violent behavior: an assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981
44. Morris N, Miller M: Predictions of dangerousness, in Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research (vol 6). Edited by Tonry M, Morris N. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985, pp 1-50
45. Shah S: Dangerousness: a paradigm for exploring some issues in law and psychology. Am Psychol 33: 224-238, 1978
46. American Psychological Association: Brief of Amicus Curiae American Psychological Association in support of defendantappellant, United States v. Sherman Lamont Fields in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2005
47. Texas Psychological Association Brief of the Amici Curiae Texas Psychological Association and Texas Appleseed in support of appellant, Noah Espada v. The State of Texas in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas at Austin, 2007
48. 48. Krauss DA, Sales BD: The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychol Public Policy Law 7: 267-310, 2001 (Pubitemid 33295207)
49. Slobogin C: Capital punishment and dangerousness, in Mental Disorder and Criminal Law. Responsibility, Punishment, and Competence. Edited by Schopp R. New York: Springer Press, 2009, pp 119-134
50. Cunningham MD, Vigen MP: Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature. Behav Sci Law 20:191-210, 2002
51. Marquart JW, Ekland-Olson S, Sorensen JR: The Rope, the Chair, & the Needle: Capital Punishment in Texas, 1923-1990. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994
52. Cunningham MD: Capital violence risk assessment [case report], in Forensic Assessment of Violence Risk: A Guide for Risk Assessment and Risk Management. Edited by Conroy MA, Murrie D. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007, pp 287-290
53. Flanagan TJ: Time served and institutional misconduct: patterns of involvement in disciplinary infractions among long-term and short-term inmates. J Crim Just 8:357-367, 1980
54. Gendreau P, Goggin CE, Law MA: Predicting prison misconducts. Crim Just Behav 24: 414-431, 1997
55. Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR: Predictive factors for violent misconduct in close custody. Prison J 87: 241-253, 2007
56. Kuanliang A, Sorensen JR, Cunningham MD: Juvenile offenders in an adult prison system: a comparative examination of rates and correlares of misconduct. Crim Just Behav 35: 1186-1201, 2008
57. Harer MD, Langan NP: Gender differences in predictors of prison violence: assessing the predictive validity of a risk classification system. Crime Delinq 47: 513-536, 2001 (Pubitemid 33333561)
58. State of Texas v. Jack Wade Clark, 364th District Court of Lubbock County, 1991
59. Sorensen JR, Cunningham MD: Operationalizing risk: the influence of measurement choice on the prevalence and correlates of violence among incarcerated murderers. J Crim Just 35: 546-555, 2007