Risk of reintervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 657-663

  Karthikesalingam, A ^a   Holt, P J E ^a   Hinchliffe, R J ^a   Nordon, I M ^a   Loftus, I M ^a   Thompson, M M ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MORTALITY; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; STENT;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 77951776838     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6991     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:2179-2186. (Pubitemid 40853910)
2. Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2398-2405. (Pubitemid 40958436)
3. Black SA, Carrell TW, Bell RE, Waltham M, Reidy J, Taylor P. Long-term surveillance with computed tomography after endovascular aneurysm repair may not be justified. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1280-1283.
4. Sternbergh WC III, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Tonnessen BH; Zenith Investigators. Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vase Surg 2008; 48: 278-284.
5. Biasi L, Ali T, Ratnam LA, Morgan R, Loftus I, Thompson M. Intra-operative DynaCT identifies technical problems undiagnosed by uniplanar angiography during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vase Surg 2009; 49: 288-295.
6. Adam DJ, Fitridge RA, Raptis S. Late reintervention for aortic graft-related events and new aortoiliac disease after open abdominal aortic aneurysm, repair in an Australian population.J Vasc Surg 2006; 43: 701-705.
7. Allen RC, Schneider J, Longnecker L, Smith RB III, Lumsden AB. Paraanastomotic aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. J Vase Surg 1993; 18: 424-431.
8. Biancari F, Ylönen F, Anttila V, Juvonen J, Romsi P, Satta J et al. Durability of open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 15-year follow-up study. J Vase Surg 2002; 35: 87-93. (Pubitemid 44725776)
9. Curl GR, Faggioli GL, Stella A, D'Addato M, Ricotta JJ. Aneurysmal change at or above the proximal anastomosis after infrarenal aortic grafting. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16: 855-859. (Pubitemid 23001551)
10. Mills JL Sr, Duong ST, Leon LRJr, Goshima KR, Ihnat DM, Wendel CS et al. Comparison of the effects of open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair on long-term renal function using chronic kidney disease staging based on glomerular filtration rate. J Vase Surg 2008; 47: 1141-1149.
11. Boyle JR. Long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 447-448.
12. Chaer RA, Gushchin A, Rhee R, Marone L, Cho JS, Leers S et al. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 845-849.
13. Walsh SR, Tang TY, Boyle JR. Renal consequences of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovas Ther 2008; 15: 73-82. (Pubitemid 351252235)
14. Michaels JA, Drury D, Thomas SM. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 960-967. (Pubitemid 41160785)
15. Weerakkody RA, Walsh SR, Cousins C, Goldstone KE, Gaunt ME. Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 699-702.
16. Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, Prins TR, Zeebregts CJ, van Andringa de Kempenaer MG, Cinà CS et al. Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 357-364. (Pubitemid 39207084)
17. Nordon IM, Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vase Surg [Epub ahead of print 2 3 November 2009].
18. Dias NV, Riva L, Ivancev K, Resch T, Sonesson B, Malina M. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 425-430.
19. Schlösser FJ, Gusberg RJ, Dardik A, Lin PH, Verhagen HJ, Moll FL et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted? Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg 2009; 37:15-22.
20. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vase Surg 2002; 35: 1048-1060. (Pubitemid 46098517)
21. Patterson BO, Holt PJ, Hinchliffe R, Loftus FM, Thompson MM. Predicting risk in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review of current evidence. Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg 2008; 36: 637-645.
22. Sun Z, Mwipatayi BP, Semmens JB, Lawrence-Brown MM. Short to midterm outcomes of fenestrated endovascular grafts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 747-753. (Pubitemid 44907638)
23. Oranen BI, Bos WT, Verhoeven EL, Tielliu IF, Zeebregts CJ, Prins TR et al. Is emergency endovascular aneurysm repair associated with higher secondary intervention risk at mid-term follow-up? J Vase Surg 2006; 44:1156-1161