A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients

Cornea

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 510-515

  Kim, Eun Chul ^a   Kim, Man Soo ^a  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endothelial cell loss; Normal corneas; Phacoemulsification; Transplanted corneas

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CELL LOSS; CONGENITAL CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEA OPACITY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EYE BURN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATITIS; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPATHY; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CELL COUNT; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 77951768715     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c11e0e     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Martin TP, Reed JW, Legault C, et al. Cataract formation and cataract extraction after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1994;101: 113-119.
2. Nagra PK, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PL, et al. Cataract extraction following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2004;23:377-379.
3. Ohguro N, Matsuda M, Kinoshita S. Effects of posterior chamber lens implantation on the endothelium of transplanted corneas. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81:1056-1059.
4. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38: 779-782.
5. Bourne WM, Nelson LR, Hodge DO. Continued endothelial cell loss ten years after lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1014-1023.
6. Bourne WM, Hodge DO, Nelson LR. Corneal endothelium five years after transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:185-196.
7. Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, et al. Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1855-1865.
8. Hayashi K, Hayashi H. Simultaneous versus sequential penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery. Cornea. 2006;25:1020-1025.
9. Davis EA, Stark WJ. The triple procedure-is it the best approach for the patient? The triple procedure may be superior to sequential surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:414-415.
10. Hamill MB. Sequential surgery may be the best approach for the patient. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:415-417.
11. Malbran ES, Malbran E Jr, Malbran J. In favor of the triple procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1223-1224.
12. Bourne WM. Cellular changes in transplanted human corneas. Cornea. 2001;20:560-569.
13. Hsiao CH, Chen JJ, Chen PY, et al. Intraocular lens implantation after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2001;20:580-585.
14. Ohrloff C, Zubcov AA. Comparison of phacoemulsification and planned extracapsular extraction. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211:8-12.
15. Shimmura S, Ohashi Y, Shiroma H, et al. Corneal opacity and cataract: triple procedure versus secondary approach. Cornea. 2003;22:234-238.
16. Bertelmann E, Pleyer U, Rieck P. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:766-770.