Using a P300 brain-computer interface in an immersive virtual environment

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 12-24

  Donnerer, Michael ^a   Steed, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951753129     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.19.1.12     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bayliss, J. (2003). Use of the evoked potential P3 component for control in a virtual apartment. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 11(2), 113-116.
2. Bayliss, J., & Ballard, D. (1999). Single trial P300 recognition in a virtual environment. Computational Intelligence: Methods & Applications Proceedings, Soft Computing in Biomedicine.
3. Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., et al. (1999). A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature, 398(6725), 297-298.
4. Cinel, C., Poli, R., & Citi, L. (2004). Possible sources of perceptual errors in P300-based speller paradigm. Biomedizinische Technik, 49, 39-40.
5. Edlinger, G., Holzner, C., Groenegress, C., Guger, C., & Slater, M. (2009). Goal-oriented control with brain-computer interface. Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, LNCS, 732-740. Berlin: Springer.
6. Farwell, L., & Donchin, E. (1988). Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 70(6), 510-523.
7. Guan, C., Thulasidas, M., & Wu, J. (2004). High performance P300 speller for brain-computer interface. In 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.
8. Hillyard, S., Squires, K., Bauer, J., & Lindsay, P. (1971). Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science, 172(3990), 1357-1360.
9. Hoffmann, U., Vesin, J., Ebrahimi, T., & Diserens, K. (2008). An efficient P300-based brain-computer interface for disabled subjects. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 167(1), 115-125.
10. Jasper, H. (1958). The 10-20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
11. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197(4305), 792-795.
12. Lalor, E. (2005). Steady-state VEP-based brain-computer interface control in an immersive 3D gaming environment. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2005(19), 3156-3164.
13. Leeb, R., Keinrath, C., Friedman, D., Guger, C., Scherer, R., Neuper, C., et al. (2006). Walking by thinking: The brainwaves are crucial, not the muscles! Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(5), 500-514.
14. Lotte, F., Renard, Y., & Lécuyer, A. (2008). Self-paced brain-computer interaction with virtual worlds: A quantitative and qualitative study out of the lab. In Proceedings of the 4th International Brain-Computer Interface Workshop and Training Course, 373-378.
15. Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (2001). Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89(7), 1123-1134.
16. Piccione, F., Giorgi, F., Tonin, P., Priftis, K., Giove, S., Silvoni, S., et al. (2006). P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(3), 531-537.
17. Piccione, F., Priftis, K., Tonin, P., Vidale, D., Furlan, R., Cavinato, M. (2008). Task and stimulation paradigm effects in a P300 brain computer interface exploitable in a virtual environment: A pilot study. Psychnology Journal, 6(1), 99-108.
18. Picton, T. (1992). The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 9(4), 456.
19. Sellers, E., & Donchin, E. (2006). A P300-based brain-computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(3), 538-548.
20. Serby, H., Yom-Tov, E., & Inbar, G. (2005). An improved P300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 13(1), 89-98.
21. Squires, K., Hillyard, S., & Lindsay, P. (1973). Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 265-272.
22. Steed, A. (2008). A simple method for estimating the latency of interactive, real-time graphics simulations. In VRST '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, 123-129.
23. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150(3700),1187-1188.
24. Touyama, H., Aotsuka, M., & Hirose, M. (2008). A pilot study on virtual camera control via steady-state VEP in immersing virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Third IASTED International Conference (Vol. 611, p. 43).
25. Vidal, J. (1973). Toward direct brain-computer communication. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 2(1), 157-180.
26. Wolpaw, J., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 767-791.