Implementation of dispersion models in the split-field-finite-difference- time-domain algorithm for the study of metallic periodic structures at oblique incidence

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2010, Pages

  Belkhir, A ^a   Arar, O ^b   Benabbes, S S ^b   Lamrous, O ^a   Baida, F I ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ MOULOUD MAMMERI   (Algeria)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL EQUATIONS; ANGLE OF INCIDENCE; DISPERSION MODELS; DISPERSIVE MEDIA; ENHANCED TRANSMISSION; FDTD ALGORITHM; FIELD COMPONENTS; FIELD METHODS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN; LORENTZ DISPERSION MODEL; METAL DISPERSIONS; OBLIQUE INCIDENCE;

DISPERSIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE TIME DOMAIN METHOD;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 77951753084     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046705     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference-Time-Domain Method, 2nd ed. (Artech House, Norwood, MA, 2005).
2. A. Belkhir and F. I. Baida, Phys. Rev. E 77, 056701 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.056701
3. F. I. Baida, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 89, 145 (R) (2007). 10.1007/s00340-007-2787-3
4. F. I. Baida and A. Blekhir, Opt. Lett. 34, 2453 (2009). 10.1364/OL.34.002453
5. I. Valuev, A. Deinega, and S. Belousov, Opt. Lett. 33, 1491 (2008). 10.1364/OL.33.001491
6. The Drude model is given by ε (ω) = 1 - ω p 2 ω (ω + i γ), where ω p is the plasma frequency and γ is associated to the losses.
7. R. M. Joseph, S. C. Hagness, and A. Taflove, Opt. Lett. 16, 1412 (1991). 10.1364/OL.16.001412
8. A. Vial, A.-S. Grimault, D. Macías, D. Barchiesi, and M.-L. de la Chapelle, Phys. Rev. B 71, 085416 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.085416
9. R. J. Blaikie, L. Lin, and R. J. Reeves, Proceedings of the International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICONN 2006), Brisbane, Australia, (IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2006), pp. 458-461.
10. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370 (1972). 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370
11. D. Van Labeke, D. Gérard, B. Guizal, F. I. Baida, and L. Li, Opt. Express 14, 11945 (2006). 10.1364/OE.14.011945
12. For a perfect conductor, this mode is called TEM mode (Eφ and H z are zero). In the case of a real metal, these two components of the guided electromagnetic field can not completely vanish because of the penetration of the field inside the metal.
13. F. I. Baida and D. Van Labeke, Opt. Commun. 209, 17 (2002). 10.1016/S0030-4018(02)01690-5
14. J. Rybczynski, K. Kempa, A. Herczynski, Y. Wang, M. J. Naughton, Z. F. Ren, Z. P. Huang, D. Cai, and M. Giersig, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 021104 (2007). 10.1063/1.2430400
15. T. Thio, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 136 (2007). 10.1038/nnano.2007.53
16. E. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic Press, New York, 1985).