Values of stakeholders in the net neutrality debate: Applying content analysis to telecommunications policy

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Cheng, An Shou ^a   Fleischmann, Kenneth R ^a   Wang, Ping ^a   Ishita, Emi ^b   Oard, Douglas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SURUGADAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION ACCESS; POLICY DEBATES; PUBLIC HEARINGS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIFIC VALUES; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY;

INNOVATION; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77951747543     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.434     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Alliance for Public Technology, The Network Neutrality Debate: Critical Issues that Should be Addressed by Congress, 2006, http://www.apt.org/ publications/reports-studies/Net-Neutrality-June06.pdf
2. J.M. Bauer, "Dynamic Effects of Net Neutrality", International Journal of Communication, 1, 2007, pp. 531-547.
3. B.L. Berg, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
4. V. Cerf, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Feb 7 2006, http://commerce.senate.gov/ pdf/cerf-020706.pdf
5. K. Chen, J.C. Mathes, K. Jarboe, and J. Wolfe, "Value Oriented Social Decision Analysis: Enhancing Mutual Understanding to Resolve Public Policy Issues", IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 9(9), 1979, pp. 567-580.
6. B.A. Cherry, "Analyzing the Net Neutrality Debate Through Awareness of Agenda Denial", International Journal of Communication, 1, 2007, pp. 580-594.
7. J. Citron, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 2006 http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/ citron-020706.pdf
8. nd Ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000.
9. Federal Communication Commission, Broadband Network Management Practices Public Hearing, Palo Alto, Apr. 17, 2008.
10. F. Fischer, Politics, Values, and Public Policy, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1980.
11. G.S. Ford, Testimony on Broadband Network Management Practices before the Federal Communications Commission, 2008, http://www.fcc.gov/broadband-network- management/041708/ford.pdf
12. A.A. Gilroy, "Net Neutrality: Background and Issues", CRS Report RS22444, 2007, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS22444.pdf
13. B. Glass, Testimony on Broadband Network Management Practices before the Federal Communications Commission, 2008, http://www.fcc.gov/broadband-network- management/041708/glass-stmt.pdf
14. J.R. Landis and G.G. Koch, "The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data", Biometrics, 33, 1977, pp. 159-174.
15. L. Lessig, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 2006, http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/ lessig-020706.pdf
16. K. Martin, "Keynote Remarks of Chairman Kevin Martin of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission", In Network Neutrality Conference - Implications for Innovation and Business Online, 2008, http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/ edocs-public/attachmatch/DOC-285830A1.pdf
17. W.B. McCormick, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 2006, http://commerce.senate. gov/pdf/mccormick-020706.pdf
18. K. McSlarrow, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 2006, http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/ mcslarrow-020706.pdf
19. R. Morris, "Computerized Content Analysis in Management Research: A Demonstration of Advantages and Limitations", Journal of Management, 20(4), 1994, pp. 903-931.
20. K.G. Mumford, and J.B. Callicott, "Computer-aided Qualitative Content Analysis: A Useful Approach for the Study of Values", In D.N. Bengston (Ed.), Applications of Computer-Aided Text Analysis in Natural Resources, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 2000, pp. 43-47.
21. J.M. Peha, "Benefits and Risks of Mandating Net Neutrality, and Quest for a Balanced Policy", International Journal of Communication, 1, 2007, pp. 644-668.
22. G.L. Rosston, Testimony on Broadband Network Management Practices before the Federal Communications Commission, 2008, http://www.fcc.gov/broadband- network-management/041708/rosston.pdf
23. S.H. Schwartz, "Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, NY, 1992.
24. S.H. Schwartz, "Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values?", Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 1994, pp. 19-45.
25. S.H. Schwartz, "Value Orientations: Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences Across Nations", In J. Rogers, et al (Eds.), Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey, Sage, London, 2007, pp. 169-203.
26. J.G. Sidak, "A Consumer-Welfare Approach to Network neutrality Regulation of the Internet", Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2(3), 2006, pp. 349-474.
27. J.G. Sidak, Testimony on Network Neutrality before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 2006, http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/ sidak-020706.pdf
28. U.S. Senate, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation Hearing on Network Neutrality, Washington, DC, Feb. 7, 2006.
29. R.P. Weber, Basic Content Analysis, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.
30. E. Woodrum, "Mainstreaming Content Analysis in Social Science: Methodological Advantages, Obstacles, and Solutions", Social Science Research, 13, 1984, pp. 1-19.
31. T. Wu, "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination", Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 2, 2003, pp. 141-178.
32. C.S. Yoo, "Beyond Network Neutrality", Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 19(1), 2005, pp. 1-77.