A comparison of the influence of social factors and technological factors on adoption and usage of knowledge management systems

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Hester, Andrea J ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INNOVATION DIFFUSION THEORY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; POTENTIAL PROBLEMS; RE-EVALUATION; SOCIAL FACTOR; TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS; TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTION; TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION;

INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 77951736704     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. King, W., Keynote paper: Knowledge Management: A Systems Perspective. International Journal of Business Systems and Research, 2007. 1(1).
2. Wagner, C. and N. Bolloju, Supporting Knowledge Management in Organizations with Conversational Technologies: Discussion forums, Weblogs and Wikis. Journal of Database Management, 2005. 16(2): p. Editorial Preface.
3. Frappaolo, C. and L.T. Wilson (2003) After the Gold Rush: Harvesting Corporate Knowledge Resources. intelligentKM.
4. Wagner, C., Breaking the Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck Through Conversational Management. Information Resources Management Journal, 2006. 19(1): p. 70-83.
5. Moore, G.C. and I. Benbasat, Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 1991. 2(3): p. 192-222.
6. Reich, B.H. and I. Benbasat, Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 2000. 24(1): p. 81-113.
7. Joshi, K.D., S. Sarker, and S. Sarker, Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes. Decision Support Systems, 2007. 43: p. 322-335.
8. Mohtashami, M., et al., Risk Management for Collaborative Software Development. Information Systems Management, 2006: p. 20-30.
9. Kankanhalli, A., B.C.Y. Tan, and K.-K. Wei, Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2005. 29(1): p. 113-143.
10. Butler, T., From Data to Knowledge and Back Again: Understanding the Limitations of KMS. Knowledge and Process Management, 2003. 10(3): p. 144-155.
11. Lyytinen, K. and G.M. Rose, The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2003. 27(4): p. 557-595.
12. Compeau, D.R., D.B. Meister, and C.A. Higgins, From Prediction to Explanation: Reconceptualizing and Extending the Perceived Characteristics of Innovating. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2007. 8(8): p. 409-439.
13. Straub, D.W. and A. Burton-Jones, Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2007. 8(4): p. 223-229.
14. Davis, F., Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1989. 13(3): p. 319-339.
15. Davis, F., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 1989. 35(8): p. 982-1003.
16. Straub, D.W., M. Limayem, and E. Karahanna, Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing. Management Science, 1995. 41(8): p. 1328-1342.
17. Venkatesh, V., et al., Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2008. 32(3): p. 483-501.
18. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. 1995, New York: The Free Press.
19. Igbaria, M., F. Pavri, and S. Huff, Microcomputer Applications: An Empirical Look at Usage. Information & Management, 1989. 16: p. 187-196.
20. Karahanna, E., D.W. Straub Jr., and N.L. Chervany, Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1999. 23(2): p. 183-213.
21. Bandyopadhyay, K. and K.A. Fraccastoro, The Effect of Culture on User Acceptance of Information Technology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2007. 19: p. 522-543.
22. Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad, The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies. Decision Sciences, 1997. 28(3): p. 557-582.
23. Compeau, D.R. and C.A. Higgins, Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Information Systems Research, 1995. 6(2): p. 118-143.
24. Venkatesh, V. and M.G. Morris, Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2000. 24(1): p. 115-139.
25. Venkatesh, V., et al., User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2003. 27(3): p. 425-478.
26. Bock, G.-W., et al., Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces and Organizational Climate. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2005. 29(1): p. 87-111.
27. Wasko, M.M. and S. Faraj, Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2005. 29(1): p. 35-57.
28. Lee, Y., K.A. Kozar, and K.R.T. Larsen, The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2003. 12: p. 752-780.
29. Bajaj, A., A Study of Senior Information Systems Managers' Decision Models in Adopting New Computing Architectures. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2000. 1(1es).
30. Dedrick, J. and J. West. An Exploratory Study into Open Source Platform Adoption. in 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2004. Hawaii: IEEE.
31. Chin, W.W., B.L. Marcolin, and P.R. Newsted, A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation, Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study. Information Systems Research, 2003. 14(2): p. 189-217.
32. Ringle, C.M., S. Wende, and A. Will, SmartPLS. 2005: Hamburg.
33. Comrey, A.L., A First Course in Factor Analysis. 1973, New York, NY: Academic Press.
34. Fornell, C. and D. Larcker, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981. 18(1): p. 399-450
35. Chin, W.W., The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling, in Modern Methods for Business Research, L.E. Associates, Editor. 1998: Mahwah, NJ. p. 295-336.
36. Riemenschneider, C.K., B.C. Hardgrave, and F. Davis, Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2002. 28(12): p. 1135-1145.
37. Sun, H. and P. Zhang, Causal Relationships between Perceived Enjoyment and Perceived Ease of Use: An Alternative Approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2006. 7(9): p. 618-645.
38. Pavlou, P.A. and M. Fygenson, Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2006. 30(1): p. 115-143.
39. Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., A. Rai, and M. Keil, Understanding Digital Inequality: Comparing Continued Use Behavioral Models of the Socio-Economically Advantaged and Disadvantaged. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2008. 32(1): p. 97-126.