Benign prostate glands at the bladder neck margin in robotic vs open radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 105, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1446-1449

  Loeb, Stacy ^a   Epstein, Jonathan I ^a   Ross, Ashley E ^a   Schultz, Luciana ^a   Humphreys, Elizabeth B ^a   Jarow, Jonathan P ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Benign glands; Bladder neck; Open prostatectomy; Positive margin; Robotic

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTIC ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; ROBOTICS; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 77951733969     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09336.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2008 26 : 2278 2284
2. Jurczok A, Zacharias M, Wagner S, Hamza A, Fornara P. Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2007 99 : 1461 1466
3. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006 67 : 360 363
4. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 177 : 929 931
5. Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. J Urol 2005 174 : 912 914
6. Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2006 49 : 866 871
7. Kohl SK, Balaji KC, Smith LM et al. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 2007 69 : 1112 1116
8. Latiff A. Preservation of bladder neck fibers in radical prostatectomy. Urology 1993 41 : 566 567
9. Gomez CA, Soloway MS, Civantos F, Hachiya T. Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Urology 1993 42 : 689 693
10. Smith JA Jr., Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 178 : 2385 2389
11. Chuang AY, Nielsen ME, Hernandez DJ, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007 178 : 1306 1310
12. Ravery V. The significance of recurrent PSA after radical prostatectomy: benign versus malignant sources. Semin Urol Oncol 1999 17 : 127 129